|
Post by Daryl the Beryl on Feb 26, 2015 7:08:45 GMT -5
Top 50 on Alternative:
0 48 NATE RUESS Nothing Without Love 186 0 186 1.286
|
|
|
Post by American Idiot on Feb 26, 2015 13:23:46 GMT -5
I finally heard this just before after not being able to find a working video for the last week or so. It's not bad, but I'd rather hear new material from from fun.
|
|
Kyle
New Member
Joined: August 2014
Posts: 215
|
Post by Kyle on Feb 26, 2015 13:38:30 GMT -5
I like it, I mean we still have a full album to hear so I'm not too worried
|
|
Cody
6x Platinum Member
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 6,692
|
Post by Cody on Feb 26, 2015 17:56:46 GMT -5
I finally heard this just before after not being able to find a working video for the last week or so. It's not bad, but I'd rather hear new material from from fun. This.
|
|
Cody
6x Platinum Member
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 6,692
|
Post by Cody on Feb 27, 2015 9:18:56 GMT -5
^ Scratch that Listen #1: What American Idiot said Listen #2: A bit better *went to bed* Listen #3: Wait a minute... Listen #4: This is better than both "We Are Young" AND "Carry On"...damn I love it!
|
|
dm2081
7x Platinum Member
Joined: April 2014
Posts: 7,031
|
Post by dm2081 on Feb 27, 2015 11:46:36 GMT -5
Yeah on first listen I found this to be quite good and catchy. I can definitely see this being pretty big. So far I like fun. when they're doing their side projects better than the actual band themselves lol Bleachers were really strong and now so is this so far.
|
|
|
Post by Daryl the Beryl on Mar 1, 2015 7:07:54 GMT -5
Top 40 on Alternative:
0 36 NATE RUESS Nothing Without Love 354 0 354 2.027
|
|
|
Post by Daryl the Beryl on Mar 5, 2015 7:08:09 GMT -5
Top 30 on Alternative:
48 30 NATE RUESS Nothing Without Love 465 186 279 1.848
|
|
Lordef†ones
6x Platinum Member
Let's drown underneath the stars
Joined: April 2013
Posts: 6,271
|
Post by Lordef†ones on Mar 5, 2015 9:49:38 GMT -5
I don't know how I feel about this yet. I prefer Bleachers to Fun like most everyone.
|
|
Cody
6x Platinum Member
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 6,692
|
Post by Cody on Mar 5, 2015 10:36:38 GMT -5
I don't know how I feel about this yet. I prefer Bleachers to Fun like most everyone. Single-wise I'd say: Some Nights > Rollercoaster > I Wanna Get Better > Nothing Without Love > Carry On > We Are Young
|
|
Lordef†ones
6x Platinum Member
Let's drown underneath the stars
Joined: April 2013
Posts: 6,271
|
Post by Lordef†ones on Mar 5, 2015 11:06:40 GMT -5
I'd have to say Rollercoaster > I Wanna Get Better > Some Nights > We Are Young > Nothing Without Love > Carry On
|
|
pancakes
Platinum Member
Joined: September 2012
Posts: 1,529
|
Post by pancakes on Mar 5, 2015 11:11:33 GMT -5
Some Nights
We Are Young Rollercoaster I Wanna Get Better Carry On
Nothing Without Love
|
|
|
Post by American Idiot on Mar 5, 2015 13:41:12 GMT -5
Carry On Rollercoaster Some Nights We Are Young I Wanna Get Better Nothing Without Love
|
|
dm2081
7x Platinum Member
Joined: April 2014
Posts: 7,031
|
Post by dm2081 on Mar 5, 2015 14:18:41 GMT -5
Rollercoaster > I Wanna Get Better > We Are Young > Nothing Without Love > Some Nights > Carry On
|
|
zjames
Platinum Member
Joined: June 2013
Posts: 1,926
|
Post by zjames on Mar 5, 2015 15:00:40 GMT -5
Rollercoaster > I Wanna Get Better > Some Nights > Carry One > We Are Young > Nothing Without Love
|
|
RickBeatz
New Member
Joined: February 2015
Posts: 153
|
Post by RickBeatz on Mar 5, 2015 16:02:24 GMT -5
Some Nights > We Are Young > Carry On > I Wanna Get Better > Nothing Without Love > Rollercoaster
|
|
|
Post by hopelesslywanderin on Mar 5, 2015 19:52:47 GMT -5
Some Nights > Rollercoaster > Carry On > I Wanna Get Better > We Are Young > Nothing Without Love
|
|
Dreams
9x Platinum Member
We Are Lambily
Joined: November 2011
Posts: 9,271
|
Post by Dreams on Mar 5, 2015 20:36:28 GMT -5
I really, really like this.
|
|
|
Post by Doc Indie Party Rock on Mar 5, 2015 22:23:38 GMT -5
This song isn't bad at all, but why go solo? I would also rather have more FUN material. Here comes a sorta ignorant question and I'll probobly look it up myself later tonight, but is Fun's drummer the lead singer of Bleachers? That would explain Nates Solo project?
|
|
Lordef†ones
6x Platinum Member
Let's drown underneath the stars
Joined: April 2013
Posts: 6,271
|
Post by Lordef†ones on Mar 6, 2015 10:40:58 GMT -5
This song isn't bad at all, but why go solo? I would also rather have more FUN material. Here comes a sorta ignorant question and I'll probobly look it up myself later tonight, but is Fun's drummer the lead singer of Bleachers? That would explain Nates Solo project? The lead singer of Bleachers is the lead guitarist of Fun
|
|
|
Post by Doc Indie Party Rock on Mar 7, 2015 3:26:59 GMT -5
they coulda fooled me. Anyway, this vid was the whole reason I asked to begin with. Jack's a pretty talented guy.
|
|
|
Post by Daryl the Beryl on Mar 15, 2015 20:30:41 GMT -5
Top 50 on AAA:
52 50 NATE RUESS Nothing Without Love 64 62 2 0.179
|
|
Cody
6x Platinum Member
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 6,692
|
Post by Cody on Mar 16, 2015 7:50:23 GMT -5
I thought I'd be sick of this fast like was the case with "We Are Young" and "Carry On" but I'm still really liking it.
The "na na na-hey na na na-woahhh" part really works for me and makes the song stand out in a good way.
|
|
|
Post by Shadows in the Dark on Mar 18, 2015 15:43:40 GMT -5
24 23 NATE RUESS Nothing Without Love 650 617 33 1.759
Seems to have slowed down quite a bit. Guess it won't be flying into the Top 20 as soon as people thought.
This isn't bad, but it's the least I've liked a song from a band member involved with Fun. or Bleachers.
|
|
|
Post by Daryl the Beryl on Mar 22, 2015 20:08:29 GMT -5
Top 20 on Alternative:
24 20 NATE RUESS Nothing Without Love 667 623 44 1.859
|
|
|
Post by Daryl the Beryl on Mar 29, 2015 20:11:34 GMT -5
Top 40 on AAA:
44 38 NATE RUESS Nothing Without Love 89 78 11 0.207
|
|
RickBeatz
New Member
Joined: February 2015
Posts: 153
|
Post by RickBeatz on Apr 2, 2015 14:01:36 GMT -5
Mmm Alt is not jumping on board with Nate Ruess like they did with Bleachers, at least he's doing better on HAC.
|
|
Troy
9x Platinum Member
I have learned I will rise & you'll see me return Being what I am Theres no other Troy For me 2 burn
Joined: January 2015
Posts: 9,725
My Charts
Pronouns: he/him/his
|
Post by Troy on Apr 2, 2015 22:59:49 GMT -5
Rollercoaster is sooooo much better than this. Anybody know if this solo album is a side project for him or is Fun dead? Going solo after 1 hit album seems kinda hubristic. Honestly, Fun or Bleachers, i don't care...Nate is irrelevant to me.
|
|
|
Post by Shadows in the Dark on Apr 3, 2015 0:17:11 GMT -5
Rollercoaster is sooooo much better than this. Anybody know if this solo album is a side project for him or is Fun dead? Going solo after 1 hit album seems kinda hubristic. Honestly, Fun or Bleachers, i don't care...Nate is irrelevant to me. It's a solo album, and Fun. are on hiatus. And I agree that overall, Bleachers is better - Jack Antonoff has a better voice than Nate Ruess IMO. I also agree that it's too early for him to attempt a solo career after only 1 successful album (Probably should've waited for Fun. to have 1 or 2 more successful eras first).
|
|
|
Post by Daryl the Beryl on Apr 7, 2015 6:13:31 GMT -5
Finished?
22 24 NATE RUESS Nothing Without Love 603 668 -65 1.492
Let's see whether pop radio helps this, considering it's exploding there.
|
|