Blake Shelton - "Sangria"

[Ten Pound Hammer]

It uses a lot of minor chords despite being in a major key, which gives it that melancholy feel you speak of. The melody is actually very simple but it has a flow to it.

[Deleted]

Jun 16, 2015 13:55:34 GMT -5 dm2081 said:

I really hope Blake doesn't play nice with Carrie and her label once this reaches #1. I'm sick of the revolving door at #1, and this has been a much bigger hit than Carrie's. I really hope they push for a minimum of 2 weeks, but I'm doubtful that will happen. This is easily one of my favorite Blake songs ever, right up there with "Honey Bee".

I wish Blake wouldn't play nice here, too, but like you said it's highly unlikely Warner won't pull this after only one week at #1. I haven't seen Warner Music Group get remotely competitive with any label other than Broken Bow since Blake's Red River Blue era. I think the logic is, if Warner plays nice with other labels when they've got the upper hand in a chart battle, then the other labels will return the favor when Warner needs it, like Capitol Nashville did back when "Hope You Get Lonely Tonight" came up against "Roller Coaster." The only problem is, Sony, the #1 beneficiary of Warner's "niceness," has never had even one opportunity to return the favor to Warner.

I really don't feel like I "have a stake" in any of this competition since I don't like anything currently bulleted in the top 8 right now besides "Love Me Like You Mean It," so simply going by the numbers I guess I'll root for Blake to get two weeks, although I don't think I've been so apathetic about who gets to #1 since the battle between "Homegrown Honey" and "Homegrown" last March, lol. It does seem a bit unfair, though, if Carrie Underwood gets the same accomplishment, one week at #1 on both Mediabase and Billboard, as Blake when clearly Carrie's song has been not as well received by radio. I know I've said before LTG feels like a #1, but after seven straight days of weak audience gains I'm just not so sure it deserves to go all the way to #1.

[.indulgecountry]

Carrie hasn't been able to get a #1 on BB with her last three singles and has now gone almost three years without one. I'm sure Blake will live with a one-week #1 that will still extend his streak of chart-toppers to fifteen. I agree that this should probably get a second week on top based on its impact, but I really hope that Carrie & co. push hard to get her to the top after he gets his week. If they feel the need to get it another week, then maybe they can hang around long enough to get a second week after Carrie. It's not like he's being potentially robbed of a second week by someone like Eric Paslay or something.

[Carriefan1190]

Multi week #1's, even for Blake are rare nowadays. I think this will spend a week then fall to let Carrie have her week. Example of this would be Cole Swindells "Ain't Worth The Whiskey". It surged and was acting like a multi week #1 but only got a week. The norm is now to let songs take turns to get a lot of songs to #1

[trebor]

It's officially #1 at Canadian Country Radio as it moves to #1 at Billboard nielsen BDS Canada Country National Airplay! [Issue 06/27/15]  :)

[samsager3]

Jun 17, 2015 12:15:17 GMT -5 Carriefan1190 said:

Multi week #1's, even for Blake are rare nowadays. I think this will spend a week then fall to let Carrie have her week. Example of this would be Cole Swindells "Ain't Worth The Whiskey". It surged and was acting like a multi week #1 but only got a week. The norm is now to let songs take turns to get a lot of songs to #1

I really hope your wrong Carrie does not deserve a week at #1 when she puts out quality material sure but not with something like little toy guns too many songs peak at number 1 now I would love to see something like little toy guns peak at number 2 not really anything agains Carrie I just think if certain artists weren't always number 1 it might make them want to work harder at finding quality material

[Carriefan1190]

Jun 18, 2015 9:26:50 GMT -5 samsager3 said:

Jun 17, 2015 12:15:17 GMT -5 Carriefan1190 said:

Multi week #1's, even for Blake are rare nowadays. I think this will spend a week then fall to let Carrie have her week. Example of this would be Cole Swindells "Ain't Worth The Whiskey". It surged and was acting like a multi week #1 but only got a week. The norm is now to let songs take turns to get a lot of songs to #1

I really hope your wrong Carrie does not deserve a week at #1 when she puts out quality material sure but not with something like little toy guns too many songs peak at number 1 now I would love to see something like little toy guns peak at number 2 not really anything agains Carrie I just think if certain artists weren't always number 1 it might make them want to work harder at finding quality material

Actually Carrie usually takes minimum of 2 years gathering songs and writing to put out the best product. Blown Away was her best CD by miles. She doesn't just pump out albums with no quality. LTG goes where country music rarely goes anymore. It tackles an important issue in families and isn't like most bro country generic garbage about girls and drinking etc.

But this is a thread about Blake's song, so let's not get off topic too much.

[Deleted]

I think any of these big time songs are more than capable of multiple-week number ones.

The thing is, if Blake's team can choose to get 4 singles to each have a 4-week stay at #1 or 5 singles to have a 1-week stay at #1, I think they go with the latter option.

[onebuffalo]

Jun 18, 2015 10:09:08 GMT -5 @nickv1025 said:

I think any of these big time songs are more than capable of multiple-week number ones.

The thing is, if Blake's team can choose to get 4 singles to each have a 4-week stay at #1 or 5 singles to have a 1-week stay at #1, I think they go with the latter option.

It doesn't matter. Both examples give Blake Shelton #1s.

[Deleted]

Jun 18, 2015 10:27:18 GMT -5 onebuffalo said:

Jun 18, 2015 10:09:08 GMT -5 @nickv1025 said:

I think any of these big time songs are more than capable of multiple-week number ones.

The thing is, if Blake's team can choose to get 4 singles to each have a 4-week stay at #1 or 5 singles to have a 1-week stay at #1, I think they go with the latter option.

It doesn't matter. Both examples give Blake Shelton #1s.

But you don't think the label would prefer to say Blake had five #1s from Bringing Back the Sunshine? As opposed to only four? To me, that's a surefire way to both increase album sales and momentum going into the next album.

On the other hand, while four multi-week #1s would increase single sales for each of the respective songs, it may fatigue listeners to the artist. That's just my opinion.

While I agree that "it doesn't matter" because "both examples give Blake #1s" ... I do think it indeed does matter.

[onebuffalo]

Jun 18, 2015 11:18:06 GMT -5 @nickv1025 said:

Jun 18, 2015 10:27:18 GMT -5 onebuffalo said:

It doesn't matter. Both examples give Blake Shelton #1s.

But you don't think the label would prefer to say Blake had five #1s from Bringing Back the Sunshine? As opposed to only four? To me, that's a surefire way to both increase album sales and momentum going into the next album.

On the other hand, while four multi-week #1s would increase single sales for each of the respective songs, it may fatigue listeners to the artist. That's just my opinion.

While I agree that "it doesn't matter" because "both examples give Blake #1s" ... I do think it indeed does matter.

A comparison of three Blake Shelton CDs:

1. Red River Blue-4 #1s-1.3 million in sales
2. Based On A True Story-5 #1s-1.5 million
3. Bringing Back The Sunshine-let's just say 3 #1s-377,000 in sales

Just to get that extra #1 from BOATS versus RRB, Shelton was only able to gain another 200,000 in sales. With the fourth release from BBTS, Shelton would be lucky to see that CD go gold.

[Deleted]

Jun 18, 2015 11:25:58 GMT -5 onebuffalo said:

Jun 18, 2015 11:18:06 GMT -5 @nickv1025 said:

But you don't think the label would prefer to say Blake had five #1s from Bringing Back the Sunshine? As opposed to only four? To me, that's a surefire way to both increase album sales and momentum going into the next album.

On the other hand, while four multi-week #1s would increase single sales for each of the respective songs, it may fatigue listeners to the artist. That's just my opinion.

While I agree that "it doesn't matter" because "both examples give Blake #1s" ... I do think it indeed does matter.

A comparison of three Blake Shelton CDs:

1. Red River Blue-4 #1s-1.3 million in sales
2. Based On A True Story-5 #1s-1.5 million
3. Bringing Back The Sunshine-let's just say 3 #1s-377,000 in sales

Just to get that extra #1 from BOATS versus RRB, Shelton was only able to gain another 200,000 in sales. With the fourth release from BBTS, Shelton would be lucky to see that CD go gold.

With all due respect (I love numbers just as much as you), I don't see how that helps your point. Based on a True Story had one more #1 and sold 200,000 more copies. That being said, I highly doubt the correlation equals causality, as Blake was red hot through the latter era.

For Bringing Back the Sunshine, I don't see any indication that he gets anything less than five #1s here. If we are getting some of this garbage to the top from other artists, then one of the format's biggest male superstars can get there too. Also, sales have been down around the board.

I can't say that I'm not surprised at how low the album sales are for this one (I'm very surprised). I just don't see how that data provides any conclusive evidence for either of our arguments. There may not be any.

[onebuffalo]

Jun 18, 2015 11:36:38 GMT -5 @nickv1025 said:

Jun 18, 2015 11:25:58 GMT -5 onebuffalo said:

A comparison of three Blake Shelton CDs:

1. Red River Blue-4 #1s-1.3 million in sales
2. Based On A True Story-5 #1s-1.5 million
3. Bringing Back The Sunshine-let's just say 3 #1s-377,000 in sales

Just to get that extra #1 from BOATS versus RRB, Shelton was only able to gain another 200,000 in sales. With the fourth release from BBTS, Shelton would be lucky to see that CD go gold.

With all due respect (I love numbers just as much as you), I don't see how that helps your point. Based on a True Story had one more #1 and sold 200,000 more copies. That being said, I highly doubt the correlation equals causality, as Blake was red hot through the latter era.

For Bringing Back the Sunshine, I don't see any indication that he gets anything less than five #1s here. If we are getting some of this garbage to the top from other artists, then one of the format's biggest male superstars can get there too. Also, sales have been down around the board.

I can't say that I'm not surprised at how low the album sales are for this one (I'm very surprised). I just don't see how that data provides any conclusive evidence for either of our arguments. There may not be any.

But just because Blake Shelton takes a song to #1, it doesn't guarantee higher sales for the CD. Even if Sangria manages to be the last #1 of 2015, I am certainly won't be going, 'Sangria is #1, so I'll buy a copy of Brining Back The Sunshine.' If Neon Light or Lonely Tonight did not make me buy the CD, I highly doubt Sangria will. Shelton is hot at radio right now. That should translate into higher sales for BBTS. I think that CD should have been released this year.

[Deleted]

Jun 18, 2015 11:43:08 GMT -5 onebuffalo said:

But just because Blake Shelton takes a song to #1, it doesn't guarantee higher sales for the CD. Even if Sangria manages to be the last #1 of 2015, I am certainly won't be going, 'Sangria is #1, so I'll buy a copy of Brining Back The Sunshine.' If Neon Light or Lonely Tonight did not make me buy the CD, I highly doubt Sangria will. Shelton is hot at radio right now. That should translate into higher sales for BBTS. I think that CD should have been released this year.

And I'd have to agree. Blake probably should have waited a little before he released "Neon Light" but that's neither here nor there.

I think we may overall agree on this, but we are just walking around different details. The only way I can, to address your point, see how "Sangria" going #1 would make me buy the album is through iTunes' complete my album feature. If I've already bought the first three singles, it's gonna be pretty cheap just to buy the rest of the dang album.

[sabre14]

Jun 18, 2015 9:26:50 GMT -5 samsager3 said:

Jun 17, 2015 12:15:17 GMT -5 Carriefan1190 said:

Multi week #1's, even for Blake are rare nowadays. I think this will spend a week then fall to let Carrie have her week. Example of this would be Cole Swindells "Ain't Worth The Whiskey". It surged and was acting like a multi week #1 but only got a week. The norm is now to let songs take turns to get a lot of songs to #1

I really hope your wrong Carrie does not deserve a week at #1 when she puts out quality material sure but not with something like little toy guns too many songs peak at number 1 now I would love to see something like little toy guns peak at number 2 not really anything agains Carrie I just think if certain artists weren't always number 1 it might make them want to work harder at finding quality material

Wow. Two things.

1) This is your "opinion" that "Little Toy Guns" isn't 'quality' material. Some songs are deserving of being #1 on whether you or really anyone else likes them or not. It's how they perform on the charts. I despise "Take Your Time" but that song deserved to be a #1 single. I also find it interesting you would love for Carrie to peak at #2 but are totally against her peaking at #1...

2) She didn't 'find' "Little Toy Guns", she co-wrote the song with Chris DeStefano and Hillary Lindsey. Also, artists don't conspire to settle on sub-par material based on the fact so many singles hit #1.

---

Anyway, "Sangria" could very well get one week atop the charts since Sony wisely halted Carrie's push for June 29th through the first few days of July. Carrie very well could still only be a MB only #1, if a #1 at all but at least she has a shot now planning her push this way.

If "Sangria" was released 10 years ago, it would most certainly get at least 3 weeks at #1. Unfortunately in 2015, labels have #1 pushes down to a science and labels usually play nice. One week #1's is the norm with the majority of singles. I would love to see the days of 4-5-6 week #1's back, but those days are over.

[Fanofctrymusic]

Jenee Fleenor
‏@jeneemusic

???? AHH! My 1st #goldrecord for the song I cowrote #justgettinstarted on @blakeshelton's record! ????

(Singer/Songwriter/Fiddlist - touring with Blake Shelton )

[samsager3]

Jun 18, 2015 12:36:44 GMT -5 sabre14 said:

Jun 18, 2015 9:26:50 GMT -5 samsager3 said:

I really hope your wrong Carrie does not deserve a week at #1 when she puts out quality material sure but not with something like little toy guns too many songs peak at number 1 now I would love to see something like little toy guns peak at number 2 not really anything agains Carrie I just think if certain artists weren't always number 1 it might make them want to work harder at finding quality material

Wow. Two things.

1) This is your "opinion" that "Little Toy Guns" isn't 'quality' material. Some songs are deserving of being #1 on whether you or really anyone else likes them or not. It's how they perform on the charts. I despise "Take Your Time" but that song deserved to be a #1 single. I also find it interesting you would love for Carrie to peak at #2 but are totally against her peaking at #1...

2) She didn't 'find' "Little Toy Guns", she co-wrote the song with Chris DeStefano and Hillary Lindsey. Also, artists don't conspire to settle on sub-par material based on the fact so many singles hit #1.

---

Anyway, "Sangria" could very well get one week atop the charts since Sony wisely halted Carrie's push for June 29th through the first few days of July. Carrie very well could still only be a MB only #1, if a #1 at all but at least she has a shot now planning her push this way.

If "Sangria" was released 10 years ago, it would most certainly get at least 3 weeks at #1. Unfortunately in 2015, labels have #1 pushes down to a science and labels usually play nice. One week #1's is the norm with the majority of singles. I would love to see the days of 4-5-6 week #1's back, but those days are over.

Nowhere did I say it wasn't my opinion. I believe song being deserving is a mTter of opinion. Songs might make it to number 1 that I don't feel deserve to be there that's my opinion. I don't recall saying she "found" little toy guns. What I said was I didn't like it as munch as previous material. I also hated the horrendous undo it I liked her last single something in the water but wasn't crazy about. To me she hasn't had an excellent single since so small. And yes I would love for little toy guns to peak at number 2 because I don't like the song and don't want to see it get a number 1 peak because at the end of the day it doesn't matter sales wise but it isn't something I think deserves to boast at being a number 1 in sorry that is my opinion.

[sabre14]

Jun 19, 2015 5:43:05 GMT -5 samsager3 said:

Jun 18, 2015 12:36:44 GMT -5 sabre14 said:

Wow. Two things.

1) This is your "opinion" that "Little Toy Guns" isn't 'quality' material. Some songs are deserving of being #1 on whether you or really anyone else likes them or not. It's how they perform on the charts. I despise "Take Your Time" but that song deserved to be a #1 single. I also find it interesting you would love for Carrie to peak at #2 but are totally against her peaking at #1...

2) She didn't 'find' "Little Toy Guns", she co-wrote the song with Chris DeStefano and Hillary Lindsey. Also, artists don't conspire to settle on sub-par material based on the fact so many singles hit #1.

---

Anyway, "Sangria" could very well get one week atop the charts since Sony wisely halted Carrie's push for June 29th through the first few days of July. Carrie very well could still only be a MB only #1, if a #1 at all but at least she has a shot now planning her push this way.

If "Sangria" was released 10 years ago, it would most certainly get at least 3 weeks at #1. Unfortunately in 2015, labels have #1 pushes down to a science and labels usually play nice. One week #1's is the norm with the majority of singles. I would love to see the days of 4-5-6 week #1's back, but those days are over.

Nowhere did I say it wasn't my opinion. I believe song being deserving is a mTter of opinion. Songs might make it to number 1 that I don't feel deserve to be there that's my opinion. I don't recall saying she "found" little toy guns. What I said was I didn't like it as munch as previous material. I also hated the horrendous undo it I liked her last single something in the water but wasn't crazy about. To me she hasn't had an excellent single since so small. And yes I would love for little toy guns to peak at number 2 because I don't like the song and don't want to see it get a number 1 peak because at the end of the day it doesn't matter sales wise but it isn't something I think deserves to boast at being a number 1 in sorry that is my opinion.

You did not say "IMO" in your original post and it came off to me that you think that if Carrie put out better material she would deserve #1 singles, as a fact, that's all. Also, look back at original post, you said "if so many songs weren't #1 it might make them work harder to find quality material." Yes you did not bring up "Little Toy Guns" in that specific sentence, but your whole post was about that specific song, so I naturally put 2 and 2 together. If you use proper punctuation and paragraph structure, it would separate points and ideas you're trying to make and be less confusing to a reader who is just trying to have a clear conversation.

Songs deserve to be #1 if they have a deserving "chart run", that's my opinion.

[samsager3]

Jun 19, 2015 13:14:18 GMT -5 sabre14 said:

Jun 19, 2015 5:43:05 GMT -5 samsager3 said:

Nowhere did I say it wasn't my opinion. I believe song being deserving is a mTter of opinion. Songs might make it to number 1 that I don't feel deserve to be there that's my opinion. I don't recall saying she "found" little toy guns. What I said was I didn't like it as munch as previous material. I also hated the horrendous undo it I liked her last single something in the water but wasn't crazy about. To me she hasn't had an excellent single since so small. And yes I would love for little toy guns to peak at number 2 because I don't like the song and don't want to see it get a number 1 peak because at the end of the day it doesn't matter sales wise but it isn't something I think deserves to boast at being a number 1 in sorry that is my opinion.

You did not say "IMO" in your original post and it came off to me that you think that if Carrie put out better material she would deserve #1 singles, as a fact, that's all. Also, look back at original post, you said "if so many songs weren't #1 it might make them work harder to find quality material." Yes you did not bring up "Little Toy Guns" in that specific sentence, but your whole post was about that specific song, so I naturally put 2 and 2 together. If you use proper punctuation and paragraph structure, it would separate points and ideas you're trying to make and be less confusing to a reader who is just trying to have a clear conversation.

Songs deserve to be #1 if they have a deserving "chart run", that's my opinion.

I have strived to get better at the grammar part and I don't feel the criticism is needed. Keep the conversation on the music. That being said, what I said was abut little toy guns so yes you were correct to assert that. I didn't say she "found" it just that it is not my cup of tea. And as far as deserving a number 1 me and you have way different definitions of that. Plenty of song have chart runs manipulated by their label it doesn't mean they deserve the number one in my opinion.

[sabre14]

Jun 22, 2015 6:17:22 GMT -5 samsager3 said:

Jun 19, 2015 13:14:18 GMT -5 sabre14 said:

You did not say "IMO" in your original post and it came off to me that you think that if Carrie put out better material she would deserve #1 singles, as a fact, that's all. Also, look back at original post, you said "if so many songs weren't #1 it might make them work harder to find quality material." Yes you did not bring up "Little Toy Guns" in that specific sentence, but your whole post was about that specific song, so I naturally put 2 and 2 together. If you use proper punctuation and paragraph structure, it would separate points and ideas you're trying to make and be less confusing to a reader who is just trying to have a clear conversation.

Songs deserve to be #1 if they have a deserving "chart run", that's my opinion.

I have strived to get better at the grammar part and I don't feel the criticism is needed. Keep the conversation on the music. That being said, what I said was abut little toy guns so yes you were correct to assert that. I didn't say she "found" it just that it is not my cup of tea. And as far as deserving a number 1 me and you have way different definitions of that. Plenty of song have chart runs manipulated by their label it doesn't mean they deserve the number one in my opinion.

Your post made it confusing trying to deconstruct what you were trying to get across, and that's why I brought it up. I said it in a way to not upset you, but that obviously failed.

Songs like "Homegrown" and "Take Your Time" this year, and in previous years like "Drunk On A Plane", "Need You Now", "Don't Blink", "Watching You", "As Good As I Once Was", etc., did not have their chart runs "manipulated" by the label. That only is taken into account when there's a huge last minute push to achieve a #1 single, usually a MB only. Yes labels do a lot of background work to achieve chart success but sometimes they're songs that are just naturally huge hits. Those songs I mentioned flew up the chart naturally and most stayed at #1 for a lengthy period of time - that is what my opinion was based on, that those songs deserve to hit #1, because of their stellar chart runs.

[samsager3]

Jun 22, 2015 10:14:02 GMT -5 sabre14 said:

Jun 22, 2015 6:17:22 GMT -5 samsager3 said:

I have strived to get better at the grammar part and I don't feel the criticism is needed. Keep the conversation on the music. That being said, what I said was abut little toy guns so yes you were correct to assert that. I didn't say she "found" it just that it is not my cup of tea. And as far as deserving a number 1 me and you have way different definitions of that. Plenty of song have chart runs manipulated by their label it doesn't mean they deserve the number one in my opinion.

Your post made it confusing trying to deconstruct what you were trying to get across, and that's why I brought it up. I said it in a way to not upset you, but that obviously failed.

Songs like "Homegrown" and "Take Your Time" this year, and in previous years like "Drunk On A Plane", "Need You Now", "Don't Blink", "Watching You", "As Good As I Once Was", etc., did not have their chart runs "manipulated" by the label. That only is taken into account when there's a huge last minute push to achieve a #1 single, usually a MB only. Yes labels do a lot of background work to achieve chart success but sometimes they're songs that are just naturally huge hits. Those songs I mentioned flew up the chart naturally and most stayed at #1 for a lengthy period of time - that is what my opinion was based on, that those songs deserve to hit #1, because of their stellar chart runs.

I'll agree with you on that point I guess I just don't see little toy guns or anything Carrie has put out lately being a massive hit, again just my opinion but I feel her stuff probably had high burnout rates.and I'm sorry I'm trying to do better with grammar.

[Fanofctrymusic]

Country
No.1 Blake Shelton Sangria
+420 Cam Burning House

[Deleted]

Climbs to a new peak of #39 on the Hot 100 in its 10th week.

[fearlessarrow]

It's looking like Blake could have 3 weeks at #1 on BB with "Sangria". Based on today's MB update, Carrie went up ahead of Blake, but over on BB, "Little Toy Guns" won't be able to catch "Sangria", so that would be its first week at #1. Depending on how "Diamond Rings And Old Barstools" performs over the next 2 weeks, Blake might be able to eek out 2 more weeks on BB, while Tim and Blake each take a week on MB.

[someguy]

Jun 26, 2015 12:01:31 GMT -5 fearlessarrow said:

It's looking like Blake could have 3 weeks at #1 on BB with "Sangria". Based on today's MB update, Carrie went up ahead of Blake, but over on BB, "Little Toy Guns" won't be able to catch "Sangria", so that would be its first week at #1. Depending on how "Diamond Rings And Old Barstools" performs over the next 2 weeks, Blake might be able to eek out 2 more weeks on BB, while Tim and Blake each take a week on MB.

I doubt Tim reaches #1 on MB, but I could see Blake ending up with 3 BB weeks, too. He and Carrie will split the #1 this week (Carrie MB, Blake BB), then Blake should get both the following week. After that, it totally depends on who's ready. I expect both Tim and Easton to have collapsed by then. I guess it all comes down to whether or not Jason is at #1 level airplay by then or not.

[minha2cp]

Blake will be performing 'Bringing Back the Sunshine for NBC Sports’ NASCAR Sprint Cup Opening Theme on July 4

www.catchfence.com/2015/sprintcup/06/29/country-music-superstar-blake-shelton-performs-bringing-back-the-sunshine-for-nbc-sports-nascar-sprint-cup-opening-theme/


so will Bring back the sunshine be the next single?

[rsmatto]

Jun 29, 2015 12:41:07 GMT -5 minha2cp said:

Blake will be performing 'Bringing Back the Sunshine for NBC Sports’ NASCAR Sprint Cup Opening Theme on July 4

www.catchfence.com/2015/sprintcup/06/29/country-music-superstar-blake-shelton-performs-bringing-back-the-sunshine-for-nbc-sports-nascar-sprint-cup-opening-theme/


so will Bring back the sunshine be the next single?

Would make sense but I can see "Good Country Song," "Anyone Else," and "Buzzin'" being released too. There are plenty of options left.

[Deleted]

Not Buzzing. Anything else. Really I would take South Of Heaven or Bringing Back The Sunshine. Just please not Buzzin

[rsmatto]

Jun 29, 2015 14:24:19 GMT -5 raylatch98 said:

Not Buzzing. Anything else. Really I would take South Of Heaven or Bringing Back The Sunshine. Just please not Buzzin

It'd be nice, honestly if they released something like "Just South Of Heaven" (it's mid tempo) but he could release a song like "Real Country Song" too. Both showcase his vocal chops quite nicely. "A Girl" is nice too.

[slowmo]

I'm team anything but Buzzin'. I think I'd actually like it if it was Bringing Back the Sunshine.