Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2011 10:36:03 GMT -5
LFN? That's her next single? Never gonna make it.. There'll be big new releases by then and it's not even as good as these four. #personalopinion big releases by who? Gaga? Britney? lol. Avrils 2nd single :( |
|
colson
Diamond Member
Joined: February 2006
Posts: 17,921 
|
Post by colson on Mar 23, 2011 10:36:38 GMT -5
Yes, colson- I have that in common with a lot of others, apparently- in the musical and non-musical worlds. :) Some apparently don't understand the U.S. ageism at radio- which is fine- hence, the reminder. If everyone understood it, it would not warrant mention. Yet they are making millions off of it and you, well, you are just a poster here. ;) |
|
SPRΞΞ
Diamond Member
Joined: July 2009
Posts: 22,307
|
Post by SPRΞΞ on Mar 23, 2011 10:37:27 GMT -5
#personalopinion big releases by who? Gaga? Britney? lol. Avrils 2nd single :( aww :( |
|
JayBoozer
7x Platinum Member
Joined: December 2003
Posts: 7,697
|
Post by JayBoozer on Mar 23, 2011 10:40:22 GMT -5
I wonder if its possible that GaGa sold over 30K of the physical single of BTW. I doubt it, but I'm just wondering what the highest physical single sales are these days.
|
|
Enigma.
Diamond Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 14,176
|
Post by Enigma. on Mar 23, 2011 10:54:46 GMT -5
LFN? That's her next single? Never gonna make it.. There'll be big new releases by then and it's not even as good as these four. #personalopinion Very. I was thinking about Gaga. |
|
|
|
Post by Living Legend on Mar 23, 2011 11:23:50 GMT -5
Lady Gaga sold 24,000 physical singles.
|
|
bibliotheque
2x Platinum Member
Joined: April 2009
Posts: 2,705
|
Post by bibliotheque on Mar 23, 2011 11:24:31 GMT -5
Lady Gaga sold 24,000 physical singles. Source? |
|
SPRΞΞ
Diamond Member
Joined: July 2009
Posts: 22,307
|
Post by SPRΞΞ on Mar 23, 2011 11:26:53 GMT -5
wow, that's so uber close.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2011 11:29:35 GMT -5
Lady Gaga sold 24,000 physical singles. YAY Katy is #1  |
|
SPRΞΞ
Diamond Member
Joined: July 2009
Posts: 22,307
|
Post by SPRΞΞ on Mar 23, 2011 11:34:46 GMT -5
there is streaming, too, lol. Oh god...
|
|
bibliotheque
2x Platinum Member
Joined: April 2009
Posts: 2,705
|
Post by bibliotheque on Mar 23, 2011 11:38:08 GMT -5
there is streaming, too, lol. Oh god... & any differences in the BDS airplay  If Gaga did sell 24k physically then there's <6 points in it when using the mediabase stats. 261 + 60.055 = 321.055 206 + 109.573 = 315.573 |
|
HolidayGuy
Diamond Member
Joined: December 2003
Posts: 33,923
|
Post by HolidayGuy on Mar 23, 2011 11:41:09 GMT -5
24K would be a hefty sum for a CD single at this point.
|
|
Enigma.
Diamond Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 14,176
|
Post by Enigma. on Mar 23, 2011 11:43:41 GMT -5
there is streaming, too, lol. Oh god... & any differences in the BDS airplay If Gaga did sell 24k physically then there's <6 points in it when using the mediabase stats. 261 + 60.055 = 321.055 206 + 109.573 = 315.573 Also 261 can be anything between 260.5 and 261.5 |
|
bibliotheque
2x Platinum Member
Joined: April 2009
Posts: 2,705
|
Post by bibliotheque on Mar 23, 2011 11:46:10 GMT -5
& any differences in the BDS airplay If Gaga did sell 24k physically then there's <6 points in it when using the mediabase stats. 261 + 60.055 = 321.055 206 + 109.573 = 315.573 Also 261 can be anything between 260.5 and 261.5 260.5 +60.055 = 320.555 182.5 + 24.5 + 109.573 = 316.573 |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2011 11:47:10 GMT -5
I thought that only counted for 1-2 points though? :(
Gaga better not ruin this >:(
|
|
Enigma.
Diamond Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 14,176
|
Post by Enigma. on Mar 23, 2011 11:48:25 GMT -5
Really? So 900 singles sold might not make a difference?
|
|
Black Jesus
6x Platinum Member
Joined: November 2005
Posts: 6,075
|
Post by Black Jesus on Mar 23, 2011 11:58:31 GMT -5
Very close for both ladies!
|
|
SPRΞΞ
Diamond Member
Joined: July 2009
Posts: 22,307
|
Post by SPRΞΞ on Mar 23, 2011 12:03:10 GMT -5
this is Teenage Dream/Love The Way You Lie fiasco all over again.
|
|
d.t.m
6x Platinum Member
D.T.M.
Joined: March 2006
Posts: 6,437
|
Post by d.t.m on Mar 23, 2011 12:03:11 GMT -5
OK Katy, but Rihanna better be next.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adonis the DemiGod! on Mar 23, 2011 12:06:04 GMT -5
Gaga had 5 weeks at #1 that's more than enough. Go Katy!!!
|
|
Black Jesus
6x Platinum Member
Joined: November 2005
Posts: 6,075
|
Post by Black Jesus on Mar 23, 2011 12:10:04 GMT -5
I'd like to see GaGa hold on for just this last week because it looks like she will take over #1 on Pop radio for next week's chart :)
|
|
SPRΞΞ
Diamond Member
Joined: July 2009
Posts: 22,307
|
Post by SPRΞΞ on Mar 23, 2011 12:13:46 GMT -5
i would expect a huge write-up though, as it's not just any #1, but a record-breaking #1. So maybe it will be late, lol.
|
|
d.t.m
6x Platinum Member
D.T.M.
Joined: March 2006
Posts: 6,437
|
Post by d.t.m on Mar 23, 2011 12:16:40 GMT -5
Gaga had enough. Let these other girls get it in.
Katy's record label will do anything in their power to get that 5th #1 just watch. Her era shows no signs of slowing down.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adonis the DemiGod! on Mar 23, 2011 12:21:22 GMT -5
4 back to back #1 singles from one album. GO TEAM KATY!~~
|
|
worldwide
2x Platinum Member
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 2,145
|
Post by worldwide on Mar 23, 2011 12:28:52 GMT -5
Oh, dear, the day someone like Katy reaches 4 #1's in the row says a lot about the time we live in.
|
|
Black Jesus
6x Platinum Member
Joined: November 2005
Posts: 6,075
|
Post by Black Jesus on Mar 23, 2011 12:31:01 GMT -5
Oh, dear, the day someone like Katy reaches 4 #1's in the row says a lot about the time we live in. Normally I would agree but I actually kind of liked Katy's songs. If it were Rihanna's from this era then I would agree with you. |
|
worldwide
2x Platinum Member
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 2,145
|
Post by worldwide on Mar 23, 2011 12:33:57 GMT -5
Oh, dear, the day someone like Katy reaches 4 #1's in the row says a lot about the time we live in. Normally I would agree but I actually kind of liked Katy's songs. If it were Rihanna's from this era then I would agree with you. her songs are made for masses. so stupid and meaningles but catchy. I also like most of her songs but I'm well aware they're pure trash. |
|
David
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2009
Posts: 16,804
|
Post by David on Mar 23, 2011 12:35:07 GMT -5
LFN? That's her next single? Never gonna make it.. There'll be big new releases by then and it's not even as good as these four. #personalopinion big releases by who? Gaga? Britney? lol. Yeah its not so much about what or who is out, but the timing. All hyped or huge singles have to rise and fall at some point. If E.T had been released earlier it may have lost out to S&M or something else. |
|
Enigma.
Diamond Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 14,176
|
Post by Enigma. on Mar 23, 2011 12:46:18 GMT -5
True. But also the further the era goes the less there's the hype behind it.
|
|
Hefty Hanna
Diamond Member
a prettier jesus
Joined: August 2007
Posts: 20,487 
|
Post by Hefty Hanna on Mar 23, 2011 12:49:55 GMT -5
So a #1 for Katy isn't even confirmed yet? This is so confusing. Normally I would agree but I actually kind of liked Katy's songs. If it were Rihanna's from this era then I would agree with you. her songs are made for masses. so stupid and meaningles but catchy. I also like most of her songs but I'm well aware they're pure trash. Her songs are made for the masses, hence 4 #1s in a row. Just because you don't like them doesn't make her or her songs any less worthy of this feat. The general public loves the songs so she obviously deserves to be at the top. Any song that goes #1, whether I like the song or not, deserves to be #1. |
|
