popstop
6x Platinum Member
Pulse's Summer Intern
Advancing the Mountain Time Zone for all mankind
|
Post by popstop on Dec 11, 2013 12:41:30 GMT -5
About time!  |
|
Caviar
Diamond Member
Queen X
Joined: October 2003
Posts: 31,166
My Charts
Pronouns: He/his
|
Post by Caviar on Dec 11, 2013 12:44:15 GMT -5
It's incredible how she's racked up 13 #1 hits and she's not even 30! It's time for IDJ to put out the #1s album and tack on a few extra tracks.
|
|
charismatic
Platinum Member
Banned
"Show the world we are one"
Joined: August 2012
Posts: 1,392 
|
Post by charismatic on Dec 11, 2013 12:45:09 GMT -5
Pitbull did it again! 11 years of a successful career and still getting top 2 on the billboard hot 100 in 2013 as a lead artist. His talent always speaks for itself. Legend in the making!  |
|
Daniel Collins
4x Platinum Member
With every broken bone, I swear I lived
|
Post by Daniel Collins on Dec 11, 2013 12:47:18 GMT -5
Weird how they didn't mention the chart points separating Timber and The Monster.
|
|
C.Ro
4x Platinum Member
If karma ain't a b!tch, well, I am
Joined: July 2009
Posts: 4,409
|
Post by C.Ro on Dec 11, 2013 12:49:06 GMT -5
Finally! Rihanna back on top!!! Love her, love Em and love The Monster... Now hopefully Timber can catch a week at the top too
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2013 12:50:17 GMT -5
Pitbull did it again! 11 years of a successful career and still getting top 2 on the billboard hot 100 in 2013 as a lead artist. His talent always speaks for itself. Legend in the making! Also congrats to Pitbull on his connection to the new #1! Rihanna was supposed to be on "Timber," and now she is #1 on the Hot 100. The power of Pit! |
|
spoonabdul3
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 1,443
|
Post by spoonabdul3 on Dec 11, 2013 12:50:39 GMT -5
not trying to start a fight or stan war .. but nearly all of mariahs number ones are solos. aren't a lot of Rhianna's number ones duets/features? I don't know, so im asking
|
|
colson
Diamond Member
Joined: February 2006
Posts: 17,921 
|
Post by colson on Dec 11, 2013 12:53:29 GMT -5
^Doesn't Jordin Sparks "Battlefield" start off with those lyrics?lol
|
|
colson
Diamond Member
Joined: February 2006
Posts: 17,921
|
Post by colson on Dec 11, 2013 12:58:44 GMT -5
Mariah is prob popping a few extra Xanex pills today! Five more #1s to go RiRi! Just remember those type of 'jokes' can go both ways and far deeper if you get my drift. ;) |
|
mluv
Gold Member
Joined: September 2013
Posts: 540
|
Post by mluv on Dec 11, 2013 12:58:45 GMT -5
Why is every story somehow about Pitbull, lol.
|
|
Daniel Collins
4x Platinum Member
With every broken bone, I swear I lived
|
Post by Daniel Collins on Dec 11, 2013 12:59:05 GMT -5
I don't want to start a war or anything.. but nearly all of mariahs number ones are solos. aren't a lot of Rhianna's number ones duets/features? I don't know so im asking Mariah has 14 solo #1s , 1 duet , 3 collaborations (w/Mariah as the lead) Rihanna has 6 solo #1s, 7 collaborations (4 as lead , 3 as featured) |
|
onebuffalo
Diamond Member
#LiteralLegender
I am One Buffalo.
Joined: June 2009
Posts: 27,106
|
Post by onebuffalo on Dec 11, 2013 13:00:56 GMT -5
It should not matter if a #1 by a certain artist is a solo or a collaboration. It is what it is.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2013 13:02:11 GMT -5
any chance for counting stars to reach a new peak in the future???
|
|
ss8
Gold Member
Dupe
Joined: August 2013
Posts: 851
|
Post by ss8 on Dec 11, 2013 13:02:26 GMT -5
I'd def. say slightly more than "nearly" of Mariah #1s were not solo lol. Like Rihanna, Mimi had at least 3 #1s (I can instantly think of) with other featured singers or groups (I'll Be There duet w/ Trey Lorenz, One Sweet Day duet w/ Boyz II Men, and Thank God I Found You feat. Joe and 98 Degrees) Some may even say/dispute that some of her other songs- esp. the real urban sounding ones had 'tremendous input'(*featured raps* etc..) from other singers who greatly contributed to the hook and success of the song (even if they weren't 'officially' featured or given credit w/ Mariahs name on the single). Nowadays, the way the music biz is, ANY key role one plays in a song almost assures they'll be included as a 'featuring artist' at the minimum.
|
|
spoonabdul3
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 1,443
|
Post by spoonabdul3 on Dec 11, 2013 13:02:48 GMT -5
I don't want to start a war or anything.. but nearly all of mariahs number ones are solos. aren't a lot of Rhianna's number ones duets/features? I don't know so im asking Mariah has 14 solo #1s , 1 duet , 3 collaborations (w/Mariah as the lead) Rihanna has 6 solo #1s, 7 collaborations (4 as lead , 3 as featured) thanks! im not trying to diss Rihanna but she has had a lot of help from collabs/features. really only one of mariahs was a duet. so its looks like according to what billboard "counts and doesn't count" that Rihanna will techinically break the record at some point. but it doesn't feel totally valid to me. |
|
|
|
Post by surreallife on Dec 11, 2013 13:03:18 GMT -5
Although I don't care much for "Monster" it is undoubtedly the most popular song in the USA (I thought it was the most popular song last week, but that is besides the point). Not sure what the record is, but four weeks at #2 before going to #1 must be one of the longer waits in HOT100 history (I think Pitbull and LMFAO had longer waits).
|
|
NeRD
Diamond Member
RIHANNA NAVY
Joined: March 2010
Posts: 15,302
|
Post by NeRD on Dec 11, 2013 13:04:10 GMT -5
:'(
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2013 13:04:17 GMT -5
I'd def. say slightly more than "nearly" of Mariah #1s were not solo lol. Like Rihanna, Mimi had at least 3 #1s (I can instantly think of) with other featured singers or groups (I'll Be There duet w/ Trey Lorenz, One Sweet Day duet w/ Boyz II Men, and Thank God I Found You feat. Joe and 98 Degrees) Some may even say/dispute that some of her other songs- esp. the real urban sounding ones had 'tremendous input'(*featured raps* etc..) from other singers who greatly contributed to the hook and success of the song (even if they weren't 'officially' featured or given credit w/ Mariah names on the single). Which are these? She has 1 #1 with a featured rapper ("Heartbreaker"), and I'd hardly say Jay-Z greatly contributed to its hook. Pop stations were even playing a no rap edit. |
|
spoonabdul3
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 1,443
|
Post by spoonabdul3 on Dec 11, 2013 13:04:24 GMT -5
It should not matter if a #1 by a certain artist is a solo or a collaboration. It is what it is. according to Billboard I guess it doesn't matter.. but most of Mariahs number ones were sent to number one by Mariah alone. I think there is a difference when you have another fanbase helping a song's performance. its still impressive but it just isn't AS impressive as Mariahs run. only my opinion though |
|
Tea-why
3x Platinum Member
Joined: March 2008
Posts: 3,643
|
Post by Tea-why on Dec 11, 2013 13:06:19 GMT -5
Why is there so much hoopla over the possibility of Rihanna beating Mariah's record of solo and/or female #1's but no one mentions that she could also possibly beat The Beatles - who actually have the overall record?
I feel like The Beatles' record for most #1's gets overlooked.
|
|
spoonabdul3
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 1,443
|
Post by spoonabdul3 on Dec 11, 2013 13:08:00 GMT -5
the beatles and Mariah.
both took all (or almost) their number ones to the very top on their own!
now with all the collabs and features... it makes some people's totals less impressive.
its the same way with iTunes now, people have so many more charting hits.
|
|
onebuffalo
Diamond Member
#LiteralLegender
I am One Buffalo.
Joined: June 2009
Posts: 27,106
|
Post by onebuffalo on Dec 11, 2013 13:09:58 GMT -5
Why is there so much hoopla over the possibility of Rihanna beating Mariah's record of solo and/or female #1's but no one mentions that she could also possibly beat The Beatles - who actually have the overall record? I feel like The Beatles' record for most #1's gets overlooked. Because it is more fun to make it a Mariah vs. you know who. The Beatles would not add this kind of excitement (or fanwars, etc.). |
|
Daniel Collins
4x Platinum Member
With every broken bone, I swear I lived
|
Post by Daniel Collins on Dec 11, 2013 13:10:10 GMT -5
Mariah has 14 solo #1s , 1 duet , 3 collaborations (w/Mariah as the lead) Rihanna has 6 solo #1s, 7 collaborations (4 as lead , 3 as featured) thanks! im not trying to diss Rihanna but she has had a lot of help from collabs/features. really only one of mariahs was a duet. so its looks like according to what billboard "counts and doesn't count" that Rihanna will techinically break the record at some point. but it doesn't feel totally valid to me. Oops! I'll Be There (w/ Trey Lorenz) is a duet I think. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2013 13:11:58 GMT -5
Why is there so much hoopla over the possibility of Rihanna beating Mariah's record of solo and/or female #1's but no one mentions that she could also possibly beat The Beatles - who actually have the overall record? I feel like The Beatles' record for most #1's gets overlooked. Because it is more fun to make it a Mariah vs. you know who. The Beatles would not add this kind of excitement (or fanwars, etc.). ...and if we're ignoring the actual chart credits and just who was on the actual track, Paul McCartney is WAY ahead of everyone. |
|
ss8
Gold Member
Dupe
Joined: August 2013
Posts: 851
|
Post by ss8 on Dec 11, 2013 13:12:27 GMT -5
Although I don't care much for "Monster" it is undoubtedly the most popular song in the USA (I thought it was the most popular song last week, but that is besides the point). Not sure what the record is, but four weeks at #2 before going to #1 must be one of the longer waits in HOT100 history (I think Pitbull and LMFAO had longer waits). I thought they debuted at #3 then waited at #2 for just 3 weeks. More than 50% sure that's the case. I really like The Monster and def. prefer it over LTWYL. Its way more fun, prefer the melody, production etc..I don't get the comparisons at all to LTWYL- only 'similarity' is it's another Em and Rihanna duet lol. MJ and Paul Mac. did 2 huge duets in the 80s and they also sounded nothing alike. Back to what's certainly going to be a continued heated debate as Rihanna gets closer to Mimi, if it was a man people def. wouldnt be discussing it 1/2 as much. Thats why the Beatles are barely being mentioned. It's just the fact that both are women who have very similar strong/loon fan-bases and whose personalities can be polarizing to certain people. Also, both obviously are still alive lol (unlike Elvis, Beatles, MJ and Whitney etc.) Whether they admit it or not, people and fan bases love to see these kind of things (two attractive, relevant/powerful women competing..simple as that lol). It's almost like a boxing match. If Rihanna main competition were artists who passed away or someone like Garth Brooks lol most people would hardly even be talking about it. |
|
spoonabdul3
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 1,443
|
Post by spoonabdul3 on Dec 11, 2013 13:12:41 GMT -5
I really doubt that Trey Lorenz's name helped that song top the charts. lol
but technically very true
|
|
|
|
Post by Love Plastic Love on Dec 11, 2013 13:13:35 GMT -5
I don't think it demeans Rihanna's success at all, but I do find it more impressive when an artist can get solo #1s as opposed to "just" being a feature. I think this way of everyone though. I know they count, but in my head I always have a little footnote.
|
|
onebuffalo
Diamond Member
#LiteralLegender
I am One Buffalo.
Joined: June 2009
Posts: 27,106
|
Post by onebuffalo on Dec 11, 2013 13:15:49 GMT -5
Because it is more fun to make it a Mariah vs. you know who. The Beatles would not add this kind of excitement (or fanwars, etc.). ...and if we're ignoring the actual chart credits and just who was on the actual track, Paul McCartney is WAY ahead of everyone. You're right. Paul McCartney would be ahead of everyone when you compile his #1s with the Beatles and Wings, plus his solo career. |
|
colson
Diamond Member
Joined: February 2006
Posts: 17,921
|
Post by colson on Dec 11, 2013 13:17:44 GMT -5
Because it is more fun to make it a Mariah vs. you know who. The Beatles would not add this kind of excitement (or fanwars, etc.). ...and if we're ignoring the actual chart credits and just who was on the actual track, Paul McCartney is WAY ahead of everyone. I've been saying this for years. Why not count everything? Paul McCartney would have like 29 #1s and Diana Ross/Mariah Carey would be tied with 18. I think the entirety of person's career, whether it's solo, group, or duet should be included to the #1 total just like counting features. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2013 13:28:43 GMT -5
You can cout whatever you want. The list with the Beatles at 20 and Mariah at 18 is just one way of looking at it
|
|
