Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2015 1:23:20 GMT -5
Wait.
What if they won't let her perform at the Super Bowl with her Vegas contract so she's terminating it.
WAIT.
|
|
|
Post by It's me, bitch. on Aug 18, 2015 1:50:39 GMT -5
Wait. What if they won't let her perform at the Super Bowl with her Vegas contract so she's terminating it. WAIT.Superbowl or Vegas. Superbowl would really launch her back into public eye and she can almost just redo vegas numbers. I would pick superbowl. Release an album a few months after then world tour it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2015 15:34:13 GMT -5
could you maybe, like, downsize the image a hair please? Anyway, it's been common knowledge that we can't have both because of the stipulations of her Vegas contract. The reason she couldn't perform at the BBMAs and had to pre-record it at Planet Hollywood, for example-- she's not allowed to perform outside of the venue so long as she's under contract. Vegas kind of "owns" her, in that sense; which was fine for a while, but now that she's revving up for a new album (and potentially the Super Bowl), those restrictions are going to cause a lot of problems that she may not be able to negotiate her way out of.
|
|
KissMyAxe
Platinum Member
Dupe
.
Joined: February 2015
Posts: 1,239
|
Post by KissMyAxe on Aug 18, 2015 15:36:41 GMT -5
Yeah especially after the Mega Flop Myah Jeans when she didn't promote it at all due to the stupid Vegas contract
I'm very positive and optimistic for the next Britney era, i want it to be a Circus type of album commercial wise
|
|
upsidedown
Diamond Member
#LiteralLegender
Joined: August 2012
Posts: 10,621
|
Post by upsidedown on Aug 18, 2015 15:40:56 GMT -5
could you maybe, like, downsize the image a hair please? Anyway, it's been common knowledge that we can't have both because of the stipulations of her Vegas contract. The reason she couldn't perform at the BBMAs and had to pre-record it at Planet Hollywood, for example-- she's not allowed to perform outside of the venue so long as she's under contract. Vegas kind of "owns" her, in that sense; which was fine for a while, but now that she's revving up for a new album (and potentially the Super Bowl), those restrictions are going to cause a lot of problems that she may not be able to negotiate her way out of. This claim has never been proven though. And I HIGHLY doubt any Vegas residency contract would forbid an awards show performance. That would make no sense, considering a great TV performance could bump up ticket sales. If the claim is true, I'm sure it only deals with actual touring.
|
|
getonthebus
2x Platinum Member
Joined: November 2011
Posts: 2,501
|
Post by getonthebus on Aug 18, 2015 15:57:02 GMT -5
could you maybe, like, downsize the image a hair please? Anyway, it's been common knowledge that we can't have both because of the stipulations of her Vegas contract. The reason she couldn't perform at the BBMAs and had to pre-record it at Planet Hollywood, for example-- she's not allowed to perform outside of the venue so long as she's under contract. Vegas kind of "owns" her, in that sense; which was fine for a while, but now that she's revving up for a new album (and potentially the Super Bowl), those restrictions are going to cause a lot of problems that she may not be able to negotiate her way out of. This claim has never been proven though. And I HIGHLY doubt any Vegas residency contract would forbid an awards show performance. That would make no sense, considering a great TV performance could bump up ticket sales. If the claim is true, I'm sure it only deals with actual touring. In the case of the BBMAs, I think it's much more likely that the contract forbids a performance anywhere else in Las Vegas, especially another casino. BBMAs were at the MGM Grand, Brit's at Planet Hollywood.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2015 16:03:44 GMT -5
could you maybe, like, downsize the image a hair please? Anyway, it's been common knowledge that we can't have both because of the stipulations of her Vegas contract. The reason she couldn't perform at the BBMAs and had to pre-record it at Planet Hollywood, for example-- she's not allowed to perform outside of the venue so long as she's under contract. Vegas kind of "owns" her, in that sense; which was fine for a while, but now that she's revving up for a new album (and potentially the Super Bowl), those restrictions are going to cause a lot of problems that she may not be able to negotiate her way out of. This claim has never been proven though. And I HIGHLY doubt any Vegas residency contract would forbid an awards show performance. That would make no sense, considering a great TV performance could bump up ticket sales. If the claim is true, I'm sure it only deals with actual touring. We've had no evidence to suggest otherwise (short of a few people saying "I don't believe that!!") and quite a few claims that it is the case. Britney was unable to promote 'Pretty Girls' outside of Planet Hollywood in any capacity, or it seemed that way at least-- I mean she literally performed it once and didn't make an effort to do so anywhere else; and this is the first time she's been genuinely excited about a single in years. There's also the fact that she had confirmed herself up until recently that the residency was extended until 2017 only to backtrack on that statement. That sounds like a conflict of interest, likely because of the performance restrictions. If you want to get really technical, her contract forbidding her from performing live at the BBMAs doesn't make a lot of sense either-- a live, on-site performance would've been better promo than the pre-recorded performance. I agree with you that it doesn't make a lot of sense, but it's been reported enough that I'm inclined to believe there's some truth to it.
|
|
Eqbk
3x Platinum Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,266
|
Post by Eqbk on Aug 18, 2015 21:52:28 GMT -5
|
|
SHOOTER
Diamond Member
3x Poster Of The Year!!!
Proud internet hater > real-life narcissist. #FreePalestine
Joined: April 2006
Posts: 76,057
|
Post by SHOOTER on Aug 18, 2015 23:01:05 GMT -5
If leaving Vegas means we get another classic album from her and a fully promoted era, I'm all for it. She's only one hit away.
|
|
|
Post by It's me, bitch. on Aug 20, 2015 14:42:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by It's me, bitch. on Aug 20, 2015 14:47:28 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2015 1:39:09 GMT -5
Yeah especially after the Mega Flop Myah Jeans when she didn't promote it at all due to the stupid Vegas contract Considering she didn't act a fool that era and make a spectacle of herself, i think she did a wonderful job throwing a mediocre album and still maintaining her dignity and self respect. I just hate when older acts act desperate. I love Britney for always being Britney. On top or the bottom she is always on top and always still herself. No shenanigans or stunt shows round here, ya here.
|
|
HolidayGuy
Diamond Member
Joined: December 2003
Posts: 33,900
|
Post by HolidayGuy on Aug 22, 2015 11:34:57 GMT -5
Acclaimed Music has had its annual update. Britney is ranked No. 537 on the artists list.
Here are her all-time rankings (top 3,000 albums and 6,000 songs):
Albums- Bubbling Under Blackout
Songs 297. Toxic 765. ...Baby One More Time 5,552. Oops!...I Did It Again 4,826. Till the World Ends
Songs- Bubbling Under I'm a Slave 4 U Piece of Me Womanizer
|
|
KissMyAxe
Platinum Member
Dupe
.
Joined: February 2015
Posts: 1,239
|
Post by KissMyAxe on Aug 22, 2015 19:13:42 GMT -5
You know that ranking is shit when In The Zone isn't even on it lol
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2015 17:54:55 GMT -5
To me Britney Spears was born to me on Oct, 25, 2007.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2015 23:59:57 GMT -5
To me Britney Spears was born to me on Oct, 25, 2007. stop lying.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2015 0:12:14 GMT -5
To me Britney Spears was born to me on Oct, 25, 2007. stop lying.In The Zone was when she stuck her head out the pussy and said hi Coco, sup girl! But the bish arrived on that glorious day
|
|
think pink.
Diamond Member
👑 💅🏻
Joined: April 2011
Posts: 24,333
|
Post by think pink. on Aug 24, 2015 23:47:26 GMT -5
|
|
popbox
3x Platinum Member
Dupe
Joined: January 2013
Posts: 3,493
|
Post by popbox on Aug 25, 2015 0:16:18 GMT -5
Acclaimed Music has had its annual update. Britney is ranked No. 537 on the artists list. Here are her all-time rankings (top 3,000 albums and 6,000 songs): Albums- Bubbling UnderBlackout Songs297. Toxic 765. ...Baby One More Time 5,552. Oops!...I Did It Again 4,826. Till the World Ends Songs- Bubbling UnderI'm a Slave 4 U Piece of Me Womanizer I can't at Gimme More nowhere to be found. #IRRELEVANTLIST
|
|
HolidayGuy
Diamond Member
Joined: December 2003
Posts: 33,900
|
Post by HolidayGuy on Aug 25, 2015 7:32:17 GMT -5
Outside of the two high-ranked singles, Britney's music has not fared all that well on best-of lists. The power of those two singles help her rank as high as she does.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2015 8:51:48 GMT -5
Outside of the two high-ranked singles, Britney's music has not fared all that well on best-of lists. The power of those two singles help her rank as high as she does. What exactly does critical acclaim mean to this industry, though? Relatively little-- Spears is easily one of the most successful solo acts of all time and is still capitalizing on her brand almost 20 years later regardless. Where she ranked on a website that has an Alexa rank so low as 757,913 and declining means nothing.
|
|
HolidayGuy
Diamond Member
Joined: December 2003
Posts: 33,900
|
Post by HolidayGuy on Aug 25, 2015 9:24:08 GMT -5
Of course- she's a huge star and has been hugely successful. However, the AM site could have an Alexa ranking of 10 billion- that doesn't mean it doesn't give a good idea of how acts are regarded in terms of the quality of their work. That's not to say that there aren't some good acts who don't receive loads of acclaim. Even some acts who have been inducted into the R&R Hall of Fame weren't huge critically acclaimed acts (granted, some of those that would fall into that category waited a while for induction and at the same time, some acts who have enjoyed a lot of acclaim have yet to be inducted).
It's just one aspect of an act's repertoire, just like commercial success is.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2015 10:16:19 GMT -5
My point-- that it isn't a very important part of her repotoire-- still stands.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2015 12:09:11 GMT -5
Hey Brit bot basics or whatever you call yourselves let's start a petition with the lambs. I wanna see a urban uptempo with Britney and Mariah. I know diva duets of the past have kinda turned out lame and into a dud but these two funny,quirky trolls could cook up lots of excitement
|
|
BDGeek
2x Platinum Member
Joined: October 2013
Posts: 2,603
|
Post by BDGeek on Aug 26, 2015 22:26:15 GMT -5
To me Britney Spears was born to me on Oct, 25, 2007. And then she crawled back into the womb and has been incubating ever since.
|
|
Eqbk
3x Platinum Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,266
|
Post by Eqbk on Aug 27, 2015 17:49:45 GMT -5
|
|
Ginger Spice
5x Platinum Member
candy coated heart shapes
Joined: November 2013
Posts: 5,018
|
Post by Ginger Spice on Aug 27, 2015 19:21:23 GMT -5
I'm so mad because she's doing all this promo but I know when she actually has an album out she won't be doing shit.
|
|
Marooned@Midnight
6x Platinum Member
It’s me…HI!…I’m the problem, it’s me
Joined: September 2007
Posts: 6,765
|
Post by Marooned@Midnight on Aug 27, 2015 20:14:08 GMT -5
#Primeney will be gracing the VMA's. I can't wait! But as soon as she's done presenting that award I'm changing the channel.
|
|
BOBO
Platinum Member
Joined: November 2005
Posts: 1,511
|
Post by BOBO on Aug 27, 2015 20:31:23 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2015 22:48:01 GMT -5
idc about the promo but god DAMN does she look good???
|
|