Au$tin
Diamond Member
Pop Culture Guru
Grrrrrrrrrr. Fuckity fuck why don't you watch my film before you judge it? FURY.
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 54,624
My Charts
Pronouns: He/his/him
|
Post by Au$tin on May 18, 2017 17:36:09 GMT -5
That article only fortified my point tbh, 29,000 sales in "less than a day" of tracking? 29,000 sales in 12 hours? To some simple calculation: Last week Despacito (remix) got 80-90k sales and in 12 hours it can get 6-7k sales. In order for Malibu to sell 29k in 12 hours or whatever less than a day, then it's gonna looking to get Despacito (remix) yanked down percentage wise to 0.25 or at least stabilizing at 0.3-0.4. But no, for the first "less than a day", according to kworb that's what it looks like: 0.7 3.2 5.6 7.5 9.6 1 Miley Cyrus - Malibu 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9409 0.1493 2 Luis Fonsi & Daddy Yankee - Despacito (feat. Justin Bieber) [Remix] 0.5564 0.5956 0.7075 1.0000 1.0000 it spent 3 hours getting to Despacito, and the rest 7 hours it got it down to 0.55-0.6. That's 6-8k sales at most. Now how do you guys think that 29k is even close to 6-8k? Billboard gummed up High By the Beach's number and then was conscious of the mistake because people pointed it out. You don't know what the "third parties" are. It could make mistake from time to time. Did you completely neglect the other posters telling you that Malibu is new and won't sell consistently over the week like other songs? New releases from big artists are always, 100%, front loaded. They sell more in the first few hours than they will over the week. For an amazing example of this, look at Harry Styles's Sign of the Times. It brought the #2 song on iTunes down to less than 10%. Over the full week, though, it didn't sell that much at all. Miley has a massive fanbase. Most of her sales for the week definitely came within the first day or two, especially in those first 12 hours. Her fans rushed to download the song as soon as they could. It's not an anomaly, it's not a conspiracy, it's not a mistake. It's just what happened.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2017 17:39:00 GMT -5
But the third party is your evidence, silly. kworb predicted 34k sales after looking at all of the data for the week, it's still up as of this writing. I am not silly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > kworb didn't even publish the prediction of this week's sales! It probably hides its face in shame after giving such a far-off prediction.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2017 17:41:13 GMT -5
That article only fortified my point tbh, 29,000 sales in "less than a day" of tracking? 29,000 sales in 12 hours? To some simple calculation: Last week Despacito (remix) got 80-90k sales and in 12 hours it can get 6-7k sales. In order for Malibu to sell 29k in 12 hours or whatever less than a day, then it's gonna looking to get Despacito (remix) yanked down percentage wise to 0.25 or at least stabilizing at 0.3-0.4. But no, for the first "less than a day", according to kworb that's what it looks like: 0.7 3.2 5.6 7.5 9.6 1 Miley Cyrus - Malibu 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9409 0.1493 2 Luis Fonsi & Daddy Yankee - Despacito (feat. Justin Bieber) [Remix] 0.5564 0.5956 0.7075 1.0000 1.0000 it spent 3 hours getting to Despacito, and the rest 7 hours it got it down to 0.55-0.6. That's 6-8k sales at most. Now how do you guys think that 29k is even close to 6-8k? Billboard gummed up High By the Beach's number and then was conscious of the mistake because people pointed it out. You don't know what the "third parties" are. It could make mistake from time to time. Did you completely neglect the other posters telling you that Malibu is new and won't sell consistently over the week like other songs? New releases from big artists are always, 100%, front loaded. They sell more in the first few hours than they will over the week. For an amazing example of this, look at Harry Styles's Sign of the Times. It brought the #2 song on iTunes down to less than 10%. Over the full week, though, it didn't sell that much at all. Miley has a massive fanbase. Most of her sales for the week definitely came within the first day or two, especially in those first 12 hours. Her fans rushed to download the song as soon as they could. It's not an anomaly, it's not a conspiracy, it's not a mistake. It's just what happened. Did you also completely neglect what I JUST posted? iTunes pop bar showed that Sign of the Times indeed yanked no.2 down to 0.100 But I JUST posted that according to the same iTunes bar Malibu's first 12 hours only yanked Despacito down to 0.500-0.600. Facts.
|
|
Au$tin
Diamond Member
Pop Culture Guru
Grrrrrrrrrr. Fuckity fuck why don't you watch my film before you judge it? FURY.
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 54,624
My Charts
Pronouns: He/his/him
|
Post by Au$tin on May 18, 2017 17:46:10 GMT -5
Not to mention the iTunes chart is a rolling chart over several hours. Of course it took a bit to catch up to Despacito. It's literally like this:
Hour 1 Despacito: 5 Malibu: Not released
Hour 2 Despacito: 7 Malibu: Not released
Hour 3 Despacito: 6 Malibu: Not released
Hour 4 Despacito: 6 Malibu: Not released
Say the chart is then based off of the past four hours. At the period Malibu is released, it has 0 and Despacito has 24 units.
Hour 5 Despacito: 7 Malibu: 9 So here, Malibu actually outsold Despacito, but due to the rolling chart being over a 4 hour period, Despacito still comes out on top since it has a four hour total of 26 units to Malibu's 9.
Hour 6 Despacito: 6 Malibu: 13 As of now, Despacito has 25 units to Malibu's 22. Despacito is still on top in the rolling chart however, if we just count over the past two hours, Malibu is the clear winner with 22 units to Despacito's 13.
This is how Malibu is able to sell much more than what it looks like. The iTunes chart is not how much a song sold since the last update. If it were, it would be all over the place with no consistency.
|
|
rimetm
2x Platinum Member
Just a Good Ol' Chart Shmuck
|
Post by rimetm on May 18, 2017 17:48:00 GMT -5
But the third party is your evidence, silly. kworb predicted 34k sales after looking at all of the data for the week, it's still up as of this writing. I am not silly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > kworb didn't even publish the prediction of this week's sales! It probably hides its face in shame after giving such a far-off prediction. Yes, he did:
|
|
Au$tin
Diamond Member
Pop Culture Guru
Grrrrrrrrrr. Fuckity fuck why don't you watch my film before you judge it? FURY.
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 54,624
My Charts
Pronouns: He/his/him
|
Post by Au$tin on May 18, 2017 17:49:21 GMT -5
But the third party is your evidence, silly. kworb predicted 34k sales after looking at all of the data for the week, it's still up as of this writing. I am not silly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > kworb didn't even publish the prediction of this week's sales! It probably hides its face in shame after giving such a far-off prediction. What are you talking about? They're right here: kworb.net/cc/It hasn't updated yet because his site has been having a bug the last few days with the current popularity bars.
|
|
Au$tin
Diamond Member
Pop Culture Guru
Grrrrrrrrrr. Fuckity fuck why don't you watch my film before you judge it? FURY.
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 54,624
My Charts
Pronouns: He/his/him
|
Post by Au$tin on May 18, 2017 17:50:07 GMT -5
Did you completely neglect the other posters telling you that Malibu is new and won't sell consistently over the week like other songs? New releases from big artists are always, 100%, front loaded. They sell more in the first few hours than they will over the week. For an amazing example of this, look at Harry Styles's Sign of the Times. It brought the #2 song on iTunes down to less than 10%. Over the full week, though, it didn't sell that much at all. Miley has a massive fanbase. Most of her sales for the week definitely came within the first day or two, especially in those first 12 hours. Her fans rushed to download the song as soon as they could. It's not an anomaly, it's not a conspiracy, it's not a mistake. It's just what happened. Did you also completely neglect what I JUST posted? iTunes pop bar showed that Sign of the Times indeed yanked no.2 down to 0.100 But I JUST posted that according to the same iTunes bar Malibu's first 12 hours only yanked Despacito down to 0.500-0.600. Facts. Yes, and that actually means nothing since the chart is rolling.
|
|
Au$tin
Diamond Member
Pop Culture Guru
Grrrrrrrrrr. Fuckity fuck why don't you watch my film before you judge it? FURY.
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 54,624
My Charts
Pronouns: He/his/him
|
Post by Au$tin on May 18, 2017 17:54:12 GMT -5
Not to mention the iTunes chart is a rolling chart over several hours. Of course it took a bit to catch up to Despacito. It's literally like this: Hour 1 Despacito: 5 Malibu: Not released Hour 2 Despacito: 7 Malibu: Not released Hour 3 Despacito: 6 Malibu: Not released Hour 4 Despacito: 6 Malibu: Not released Say the chart is then based off of the past four hours. At the period Malibu is released, it has 0 and Despacito has 24 units. Hour 5 Despacito: 7 Malibu: 9 So here, Malibu actually outsold Despacito, but due to the rolling chart being over a 4 hour period, Despacito still comes out on top since it has a four hour total of 26 units to Malibu's 9. Hour 6 Despacito: 6 Malibu: 13 As of now, Despacito has 25 units to Malibu's 22. Despacito is still on top in the rolling chart however, if we just count over the past two hours, Malibu is the clear winner with 22 units to Despacito's 13. This is how Malibu is able to sell much more than what it looks like. The iTunes chart is not how much a song sold since the last update. If it were, it would be all over the place with no consistency. If you would like to see these as percentages, or popularity bars, instead of units, they would look like this: Hour 1 Despacito: 1.000 Malibu: 0.000 Hour 2 Despacito: 1.000 Malibu: 0.000 Hour 3 Despacito: 1.000 Malibu: 0.000 Hour 4 Despacito: 1.000 Malibu: 0.000 Hour 5 Despacito: 1.000 Malibu: 0.346 Hour 6 Despacito: 1.000 Malibu: 0.880 Going by this, it doesn't look like Malibu has sold that much, but in reality, it outsold Despacito since its release.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2017 18:02:01 GMT -5
That article only fortified my point tbh, 29,000 sales in "less than a day" of tracking? 29,000 sales in 12 hours? To some simple calculation: Last week Despacito (remix) got 80-90k sales and in 12 hours it can get 6-7k sales. In order for Malibu to sell 29k in 12 hours or whatever less than a day, then it's gonna looking to get Despacito (remix) yanked down percentage wise to 0.25 or at least stabilizing at 0.3-0.4. But no, for the first "less than a day", according to kworb that's what it looks like: 0.7 3.2 5.6 7.5 9.6 1 Miley Cyrus - Malibu 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9409 0.1493 2 Luis Fonsi & Daddy Yankee - Despacito (feat. Justin Bieber) [Remix] 0.5564 0.5956 0.7075 1.0000 1.0000 it spent 3 hours getting to Despacito, and the rest 7 hours it got it down to 0.55-0.6. That's 6-8k sales at most. Now how do you guys think that 29k is even close to 6-8k? Billboard gummed up High By the Beach's number and then was conscious of the mistake because people pointed it out. You don't know what the "third parties" are. It could make mistake from time to time. Ok Ride. I will admit you are right if Malibu rockets to number one, only for billboard to announce that they have made a mistake. Until then, however, I would recommend putting down the tin-foil hat. Yes, the sales are a bit excessive but kworb literally predicted HIGHER
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2017 18:18:43 GMT -5
Not to mention the iTunes chart is a rolling chart over several hours. Of course it took a bit to catch up to Despacito. It's literally like this: Hour 1 Despacito: 5 Malibu: Not released Hour 2 Despacito: 7 Malibu: Not released Hour 3 Despacito: 6 Malibu: Not released Hour 4 Despacito: 6 Malibu: Not released Say the chart is then based off of the past four hours. At the period Malibu is released, it has 0 and Despacito has 24 units. Hour 5 Despacito: 7 Malibu: 9 So here, Malibu actually outsold Despacito, but due to the rolling chart being over a 4 hour period, Despacito still comes out on top since it has a four hour total of 26 units to Malibu's 9. Hour 6 Despacito: 6 Malibu: 13 As of now, Despacito has 25 units to Malibu's 22. Despacito is still on top in the rolling chart however, if we just count over the past two hours, Malibu is the clear winner with 22 units to Despacito's 13. This is how Malibu is able to sell much more than what it looks like. The iTunes chart is not how much a song sold since the last update. If it were, it would be all over the place with no consistency. If you would like to see these as percentages, or popularity bars, instead of units, they would look like this: Hour 1 Despacito: 1.000 Malibu: 0.000 Hour 2 Despacito: 1.000 Malibu: 0.000 Hour 3 Despacito: 1.000 Malibu: 0.000 Hour 4 Despacito: 1.000 Malibu: 0.000 Hour 5 Despacito: 1.000 Malibu: 0.346 Hour 6 Despacito: 1.000 Malibu: 0.880 Going by this, it doesn't look like Malibu has sold that much, but in reality, it outsold Despacito since its release. I understand the concept of rolling charts, like airplay charts. But even if it's what you said, my roughly estimate for Malibu's first 10 hours is like: 0.3, 0.7, 0.4 (which doesn't make that much sense huh), 1, 0.9, 0.9, 0.9, 0.9... stuff like that. 10-12 hours gonna yield 7-10k sales. Still not nearly enough for that 29k figure. (And by the way, do you have evidence that kworb digital sales/iTunes top 100 are rolling charts. If so, how many hours rolling? Because I checked all over kworb and I don't think he mentioned anything about it. Just curious where do you get the idea.) If it's a 4-hour rolling chart, then doesn't it mean that Sign of the Times got no.2 down to 0.025 in its first hour or something like that? Sorry about my tone. Sometimes I just wish there are more accurate updates and calculation.
|
|
|
Post by Baby Yoda Hot100Fan on May 18, 2017 23:04:39 GMT -5
^Closest thing there is digitalsalesdata.com which tries to guess what the actual sale numbers are from those decimals. I'm not sure if kworb uses the data from there to get their weekly estimates.
|
|
jayhawk1117
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2013
Posts: 2,758
|
Post by jayhawk1117 on May 18, 2017 23:18:11 GMT -5
Jesus Katy dropped Bon Appetit for the Taylor Swift diss song as the single SO FAST. It's like Focus all over again, except she's already 3 singles deep. Still waiting for that big start of an era song though....
|
|
DJ General
5x Platinum Member
Dupe
Joined: March 2010
Posts: 5,932
|
Post by DJ General on May 18, 2017 23:29:02 GMT -5
The fact that such big hits only come once or twice a year is a testament of it's hugeness tbh. It might be more common now, but it doesn't take away from the fact that those are massive hits all the same. 2x may be a little exaggerated, but the fact is that many, many songs go past 10 weeks now. It's not that special. Uh, by default there can only be 5 songs a year that make it 10 weeks and you're saying "many, many"... 5 songs per year x 20 years is 100 songs. So SHape of you is easily one of the biggest hits in 20 years. Next
|
|
DistrictTwelve
2x Platinum Member
comfort you can feel
Joined: September 2016
Posts: 2,954
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by DistrictTwelve on May 18, 2017 23:30:01 GMT -5
I actually really liked Chained To The Rhythm and Bon Appetit but 'Swish Swish' sucks. Also, how high is Selena debuting for the 06/10 chart?
|
|
|
Post by Baby Yoda Hot100Fan on May 19, 2017 3:07:48 GMT -5
Jesus Katy dropped Bon Appetit for the Taylor Swift diss song as the single SO FAST. It's like Focus all over again, except she's already 3 singles deep. Still waiting for that big start of an era song though.... Except that Focus was supposed to be the lead single for her last album and once it became Flopcus, it only made it to the Japanese edition of Dangerous Woman. In Katy Perry's case, I think she released Swish Swish to create more buzz about her upcoming album's release and the 3 songs will actually be on Witness. So not quite the same ...
|
|
Harx
5x Platinum Member
Joined: August 2016
Posts: 5,049
|
Post by Harx on May 19, 2017 6:15:30 GMT -5
Could Black Hole Sun chart on Hot 100? It's at #3 on iTunes and entered top 50 on US Spotify. It was ineligible to chart when it came out because of these 90s physical single release rules.
|
|
Future Captain
4x Platinum Member
hi, i'm the visual representation of untreated mental illnesses
Joined: September 2014
Posts: 4,022
My Charts
|
Post by Future Captain on May 19, 2017 7:00:48 GMT -5
Could Black Hole Sun chart on Hot 100? It's at #3 on iTunes and entered top 50 on US Spotify. It was ineligible to chart when it came out because of these 90s physical single release rules. if it return in top 50, sure.
|
|
renfield75
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 1,644
|
Post by renfield75 on May 19, 2017 9:35:48 GMT -5
Could Black Hole Sun chart on Hot 100? It's at #3 on iTunes and entered top 50 on US Spotify. It was ineligible to chart when it came out because of these 90s physical single release rules. if it return in top 50, sure. I'll be really annoyed with Billboard if "Black Hole Sun" isn't on the Hot 100 next week. They allowed Leonard Cohen's "Hallelujah" to chart (just below the top 50) the week after his death and used the excuse that it had never charted before, so re-entry rules didn't apply. While BHS hit the Airplay top 30, it never appeared on the Hot 100. In fact, Soundgarden never charted on the Hot 100 at all. If they exclude it then they clearly are just playing favorites and making exceptions for individual artists.
|
|
|
Post by areyoureadytojump on May 19, 2017 9:52:53 GMT -5
I actually really liked Chained To The Rhythm and Bon Appetit but 'Swish Swish' sucks. Also, how high is Selena debuting for the 06/10 chart? Tracking for the 6/10 Hot 100 starts today with sales and streaming. Airplay tracking starts Monday.
|
|
|
Post by @DiegoMarcondes_ on May 19, 2017 10:12:51 GMT -5
MEDIABASE - 2 Days Update (05/19)
TOP 20 1. BRUNO MARS - That's What I Like: 225.046 (- 0.265) 2. ED SHEERAN - Shape Of You: 199.020 (- 2.321) 3. THE CHAINSMOKERS & COLDPLAY - Something Just Like This: 178.143 (+ 1.419) 4. JAMES ARTHUR - Say You Won't Let Go: 136.471 (+ 4.197) ▲ 5. KYGO X SELENA GOMEZ - It Ain't Me: 135.613 (+ 1.170) ▼ 6. ZEDD & ALESSIA CARA - Stay: 131.784 (+ 3.559) 7. ALESSIA CARA - Scars To Your Beautiful: 84.775 (- 1.269) 8. JULIA MICHAELS - Issues: 85.174 (+ 0.101) 9. DJ KHALED - I'm The One f/Bieber/Quavo...: 82.588 (+ 5.229) ▲ 10. SAM HUNT - Body Like A Back Road: 81.319 (+ 0.124) ▼ 11. KENDRICK LAMAR - Humble.: 78.704 (+ 2.409) ▲ 12. DRAKE - Passionfruit: 76.811 (+ 0.210) ▼ 13. ED SHEERAN - Castle On The Hill: 73.496 (+ 2.437) ▲ 14. RIHANNA - Love On The Brain: 70.547 (- 0.617) ▲ 15. MAROON 5 - Cold f/Future: 70.043 (- 4.074) ▼ 16. LUKE COMBS - Hurricane: 68.814 (- 0.205) ▲ 17. CLEAN BANDIT & ANNE-MARIE - Rockabye f/Sean Paul: 66.332 (- 3.183) ▼ 18. BRETT YOUNG - In Case You Didn't Know: 65.715 (+ 0.763) ▲ 19. FUTURE - Mask Off: 65.196 (+ 0.234) 20. THE WEEKND - I Feel It Coming f/Daft Punk: 64.471(- 0.541) ▼
Other and curiosities: CALVIN HARRIS - Slide f/Frank Ocean/Migos: 64.151 (+ 1.110) DIERKS BENTLEY - Black: 60.897 (+ 1.185) LUIS FONSI & DADDY YANKEE - Despacito f/Justin Bieber: 57.214 (+ 5.414) HARRY STYLES - Sign Of The Times: 50.426 (+ 1.359) IMAGINE DRAGONS - Believer: 48.337 (+ 2.453) CHILDISH GAMBINO - Redbone: 47.249 (+ 0.352) LINKIN PARK - Heavy f/Kiiara: 42.935 (+ 0.649) SHAWN MENDES - There's Nothing Holdin' Me...: 42.565 (+ 2.157) HALSEY - Now Or Never: 39.047 (+ 0.533) LADY GAGA - The Cure: 26.514 (+ 0.437) LADY GAGA - Million Reasons: 26.128 (+ 0.119) CHARLIE PUTH - Attention: 24.214 (+ 0.981) JASON DERULO - Swalla f/N Minaj/Ty Dolla $ign: 23.546 (+ 0.360) MARTIN GARRIX & DUA LIPA - Scared To Be Lonely: 19.903 (+ 0.209) CHRIS BROWN - Privacy: 19.424 (+ 1.246) NIALL HORAN - Slow Hands: 17.470 (+ 2.140) SELENA GOMEZ - Bad Liar: 14.848 DNCE - Kissing Strangers f/N. Minaj: 13.754 (- 0.196) MILEY CYRUS - Malibu: 13.724 (- 4.159) KATY PERRY - Chained To The Rhythm: 10.867 (- 0.680) CHEAT CODES - No Promises f/Demi Lovato: 9.038 (+ 0.713) THE WEEKND - Reminder: 8.423 (+ 1.535) PARAMORE - Hard Times: 6.575 (- 0.081) KATY PERRY - Bon Appetit f/Migos: 5.123 (- 0.725) MIRANDA LAMBERT - Tin Man: 4.912 (+ 0.292) LOGIC - 1-800-273-8255 f/A.Cara/Khalid: 4.116 (+ 0.878) FOSTER THE PEOPLE - Doing It For The Money: 3.025 (+ 0.207) NOAH CYRUS - Stay Together: 2.075 (+ 0.023) BRUNO MARS - Too Good To Say Goodbye: 1.234 (+ 0.162) TINASHE - Flame: 0.901 (+ 0.072) HAIM - Want You Back: 0.880 (- 0.187) CLEAN BANDIT - Symphony f/Zara Larsson: 0.859 (+ 0.081) BRUNO MARS - Versace On The Floor: 0.201 (+ 0.023)
|
|
scrohr424
Gold Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 756
|
Post by scrohr424 on May 19, 2017 10:18:02 GMT -5
So... I don't suppose Sign of The Times has any chance to re-enter the Top 10 off of the album release? Because it just made its way back into the Top 20 thanks to the video, but how much good will the album do it?
|
|
jayhawk1117
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2013
Posts: 2,758
|
Post by jayhawk1117 on May 19, 2017 10:53:45 GMT -5
Jesus Katy dropped Bon Appetit for the Taylor Swift diss song as the single SO FAST. It's like Focus all over again, except she's already 3 singles deep. Still waiting for that big start of an era song though.... Except that Focus was supposed to be the lead single for her last album and once it became Flopcus, it only made it to the Japanese edition of Dangerous Woman. In Katy Perry's case, I think she released Swish Swish to create more buzz about her upcoming album's release and the 3 songs will actually be on Witness. So not quite the same ... I don't think she or her label let her second single bomb so hard that she has no songs in the top 50 as the album comes out. Swish Swish seems like a much better single to ride until the album comes out.
|
|
Dylan :)
Diamond Member
smth 'bout youu
Joined: October 2014
Posts: 13,033
|
Post by Dylan :) on May 19, 2017 12:17:21 GMT -5
^A freefall is 201, 98, 37, 8, off. 204 to 201 in 2 days is not a freefall. plus is it even possible to go from 201 to 98 in two days? i dont think so... A good example of free falling is Die Young (obviously this was for reasons other than being 'old'). December 13th: #3 - 167.362 (-0.334) December 14th: #3 - 167.327 (-0.035) December 15th: #3 - 163.769 (-3.558) December 16th: #3 - 154.579 (-9.190) December 17th: #3 - 147.934 (-6.645) December 18th: #3 - 140.677 (-7.257) December 19th: #5 - 132.838 (-7.839) December 20th: #5 - 124.748 (-8.090) December 21st: #7 - 115.734 (-9.014)
|
|
|
Post by .It'sGriffin on May 19, 2017 12:48:58 GMT -5
R.i.P. Despacito Computer Boy is coming... I hope.
|
|
|
Post by kcdawg13 on May 19, 2017 13:47:23 GMT -5
I'm guessing Swish Swish will be the big hit from the album, as it has a much better chance being a joint effort from Minaj and having buzz from the Taylor Swift nonsense beef that's yesterday news.
Bon Appetit seems to be done, at least at pop radio, it should get a nice re-enter this week on the Hot 100 due to the video, and may stick around for a bit since YouTube is huge and is not slowing down, plus album release.
Chained To The Rhythm should fall off this week, but will probably get a decent boost from the album release and may catch a second wind. Airplay is slowly picking up again.
|
|
Au$tin
Diamond Member
Pop Culture Guru
Grrrrrrrrrr. Fuckity fuck why don't you watch my film before you judge it? FURY.
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 54,624
My Charts
Pronouns: He/his/him
|
Post by Au$tin on May 19, 2017 13:54:12 GMT -5
Swish Swish isn't an official single yet. It just came with the pre-order. That doesn't mean it won't be, but as of right now, Bon Appétit is still the current single. (Though, they definitely need to move on ASAP. Outside of video views, it's doing nothing.)
|
|
GPMB
Gold Member
Joined: December 2016
Posts: 618
|
Post by GPMB on May 19, 2017 14:14:18 GMT -5
plus is it even possible to go from 201 to 98 in two days? i dont think so... A good example of free falling is Die Young (obviously this was for reasons other than being 'old'). December 13th: #3 - 167.362 (-0.334) December 14th: #3 - 167.327 (-0.035) December 15th: #3 - 163.769 (-3.558) December 16th: #3 - 154.579 (-9.190) December 17th: #3 - 147.934 (-6.645) December 18th: #3 - 140.677 (-7.257) December 19th: #5 - 132.838 (-7.839) December 20th: #5 - 124.748 (-8.090) December 21st: #7 - 115.734 (-9.014) I remember this...
|
|
Normi
6x Platinum Member
Original Pop Flop Stan
probably high right now
Joined: February 2017
Posts: 6,931
|
Post by Normi on May 19, 2017 14:27:43 GMT -5
R.i.P. Despacito Computer Boy is coming... I hope. Oh, I wish!
|
|
Au$tin
Diamond Member
Pop Culture Guru
Grrrrrrrrrr. Fuckity fuck why don't you watch my film before you judge it? FURY.
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 54,624
My Charts
Pronouns: He/his/him
|
Post by Au$tin on May 19, 2017 14:57:04 GMT -5
Swish Swish isn't an official single yet. It just came with the pre-order. That doesn't mean it won't be, but as of right now, Bon Appétit is still the current single. (Though, they definitely need to move on ASAP. Outside of video views, it's doing nothing.) Oh look they heard me, Swish Swish is now under Cool New Music on AllAccess. Expecting an adds date soon then.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2017 15:03:24 GMT -5
2x may be a little exaggerated, but the fact is that many, many songs go past 10 weeks now. It's not that special. Uh, by default there can only be 5 songs a year that make it 10 weeks and you're saying "many, many"... 5 songs per year x 20 years is 100 songs. So SHape of you is easily one of the biggest hits in 20 years. Next "Massive hit" is very subjective. If around one or 2 songs a year are going 10+ weeks that is not so massive in my opinion, because they are forgettable very soon. Also, by your logic "How do I live" was not a massive hit.
|
|