|
Post by codenut on Jan 13, 2004 10:38:11 GMT -5
I have a Top 50........making a Top 100 would be hell for me (considering the factors I use for my chart )
|
|
Hybrid0NE
Gold Member
Joined: December 2003
Posts: 990
|
Post by Hybrid0NE on Jan 13, 2004 10:42:11 GMT -5
Top 15 but I rounded up to 20 for poll. I could never come up with 30+ songs that I like in a week, maybe I should listen to more music?
|
|
Control
Gold Member
#1: Reik "Que Vida La M?a"
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 807
|
Post by Control on Jan 14, 2004 5:52:01 GMT -5
I started out with a Top 15, then changed to Top 20 in December 2002. I'm pretty sure I'll stick with the Top 20, it works well for me.
|
|
|
Post by reception on Jan 15, 2004 20:38:40 GMT -5
If I had a chart I would make it a Top 50. I would throw in some Hawaiian music in there too.
|
|
Hervard
9x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 9,740
|
Post by Hervard on Apr 21, 2004 9:54:22 GMT -5
The original versions of my charts were Top 40's, from 1986 to 1992, and the others were Top 30s. But when I redid my charts in the late 1990s (I went back to 1975 even though I wasn't keeping any charts then, at three years of age), they were all Top 30s and, for consistency purposes, that's how they'll stay (although I guess I could have started with a Top 40 chart as of the first of 2000, since, for the purposes of decade end charts and millennium charts (if, in fact, I'm lucky enough to live until the year 3000), it's a whole new ballgame, but I just keep it a Top 30, since it's so much easier that way and, on the "rough drafts", I list songs that are potential charters - as "extras". Not all of them make the Top 30, but many of them do.
|
|
Miguelín
Gold Member
Sing like you think no one's listening...
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 960
|
Post by Miguelín on Apr 22, 2004 11:45:22 GMT -5
I begin with a top 20, than a top 40... and right now I have a top 50. If I had to spand it, i would have to include more album cuts, and the songs would spent years on the chart
|
|