|
|
Post by tico on Mar 8, 2005 0:51:26 GMT -5
I think both videos will be remembered but "Dirrty" was more of a video that people took a look at and where just like "whoa". They weren't expecting that from Christina at all. I think "Dirrty" got a lot more pub because it wasn't something we expected from Christina. If it were Britney, it would've been viewed as just another Britney video because of her track record of being as close to naked as possible.. |
|
|
|
Post by britneyrocks18 on Mar 8, 2005 18:08:04 GMT -5
Britney's video was sensual and sexy. Christina's was just slutty. Christina copied Britney's Slave. Christina is a ho. She says that the dirrty era was the real her, and then she said the marilyn phase was her, and now she's saying the jazz/blues thing is her. Now that jazz and the blues are getting bigger she all of a sudden wants to do this type of music. Just like on stripped the rnb hip hop thing she did was big at that time. She's a copier who has no originality whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
Post by myday2005 on Mar 8, 2005 20:05:21 GMT -5
Britney's video was sensual and sexy. Christina's was just slutty. Christina copied Britney's Slave. Christina is a ho. She says that the dirrty era was the real her, and then she said the marilyn phase was her, and now she's saying the jazz/blues thing is her. Now that jazz and the blues are getting bigger she all of a sudden wants to do this type of music. Just like on stripped the rnb hip hop thing she did was big at that time. She's a copier who has no originality whatsoever. X didn't copy Slave. Look at the videos. How are they the same? Also, she ALWAYS HAS SAID that blues, jazz, etc has influenced her and has always been her favorite so I have NO idea what u are talking about. She never said that M phase was her. Only that she has inspired her. Where did u get that? And don't go there with "no originality whatsoever."  |
|
gbaby
2x Platinum Member
Joined: April 2007
Posts: 2,489
|
Post by gbaby on Mar 8, 2005 20:35:41 GMT -5
Britney's video was sensual and sexy. Christina's was just slutty. Christina copied Britney's Slave. Christina is a ho. She says that the dirrty era was the real her, and then she said the marilyn phase was her, and now she's saying the jazz/blues thing is her. Now that jazz and the blues are getting bigger she all of a sudden wants to do this type of music. Just like on stripped the rnb hip hop thing she did was big at that time. She's a copier who has no originality whatsoever. lmao. I love when Britney's diehards try to degrade Christina.  I would clear up a few of the ignorant statements, but I'm not even going to bother. Eh... |
|
|
|
Post by kellydicted on Mar 9, 2005 4:11:20 GMT -5
I would clear up a few of the ignorant statements, but I'm not even going to bother. |
|
msanoja
New Member
Joined: February 2012
Posts: 0
|
Post by msanoja on Mar 9, 2005 6:28:23 GMT -5
While I don't agree with britneyrocks18's comments, I do feel that Christina is one of the music industry's biggest phonies. Ever.
That said, I like her music. I love her strengths, and absolutely abhor, loathe, detest her weaknesses.
|
|
Luckie Starchild
Diamond Member
Has a special title
2020 PMA Lifetime Achievement Award, 2011 PMA winner and 8X nominee!
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 14,525
|
Post by Luckie Starchild on Mar 9, 2005 9:48:07 GMT -5
People today seem to have a pretty warped idea of celebrity. I suppose the Osbournes and Nick and Jessica are considered "real" because they have reality TV shows. I dunno... seems kinda contrived to me. Christina's a private person so it's easy to consider her a "phony" for superficial reasons (because she changes her look, sound, etc.) Personally, I like musicians for their music.  |
|
msanoja
New Member
Joined: February 2012
Posts: 0
|
Post by msanoja on Mar 9, 2005 9:55:15 GMT -5
People today seem to have a pretty warped idea of celebrity. I suppose the Osbournes and Nick and Jessica are considered "real" because they have reality TV shows. I dunno... seems kinda contrived to me. Christina's a private person so it's easy to consider her a "phony" for superficial reasons (because she changes her look, sound, etc.) Personally, I like musicians for their music. It has nothing to do with reality tv shows or privacy...I also find Jessica's onscreen antics to be just as pre-meditated. Christina, however, is a different case. Her entire image is totally forced... and I'm surprised most people don't see it. Her Blender article that trashed other singers (not to mention a self comparison to Van Gogh - EEK!), her magazine covers during the Stripped era, her constant referral to her run-of-the-mill pop as "art" -- it all screams phoney, and reeks of taking the pop game too seriously (not to mention herself). And before you bring up Madonna, Luckie... trust and believe that I'm well aware of her situation as well. While she also does take herself a little too seriously, I think that a good look back at what she's accomplished is pretty indicative of some discernable talents. Outside of Christina's huge pipes and wonderful singles, she has yet to impress me on an artistic level...yet she hails herself as this "artist"... I simply don't see it. |
|
Luckie Starchild
Diamond Member
Has a special title
2020 PMA Lifetime Achievement Award, 2011 PMA winner and 8X nominee!
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 14,525
|
Post by Luckie Starchild on Mar 9, 2005 10:36:54 GMT -5
It has nothing to do with reality tv shows or privacy...I also find Jessica's onscreen antics to be just as pre-meditated. Christina, however, is a different case. Her entire image is totally forced... and I'm surprised most people don't see it. Her Blender article that trashed other singers (not to mention a self comparison to Van Gogh - EEK!), her magazine covers during the Stripped era, her constant referral to her run-of-the-mill pop as "art" -- it all screams phoney, and reeks of taking the pop game too seriously (not to mention herself). And before you bring up Madonna, Luckie... trust and believe that I'm well aware of her situation as well. While she also does take herself a little too seriously, I think that a good look back at what she's accomplished is pretty indicative of some discernable talents. Outside of Christina's huge pipes and wonderful singles, she has yet to impress me on an artistic level...yet she hails herself as this "artist"... I simply don't see it. They ALL purport to be these artists. You know I adore you but... maybe you are taking fashion, magazine covers and a Van Gogh reference a little too seriously. :) |
|
msanoja
New Member
Joined: February 2012
Posts: 0
|
Post by msanoja on Mar 9, 2005 10:45:04 GMT -5
They ALL purport to be these artists. You know I adore you but... maybe you are taking fashion, magazine covers and a Van Gogh reference a little too seriously. :) Uhh... how else should I take it? What, was she joking ??? Please, Christina's "artistry" goes about as deep as a kiddie pool  Not even Britney tries to fool anyone. |
|
Luckie Starchild
Diamond Member
Has a special title
2020 PMA Lifetime Achievement Award, 2011 PMA winner and 8X nominee!
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 14,525
|
Post by Luckie Starchild on Mar 9, 2005 11:03:13 GMT -5
Uhh... how else should I take it? What, was she joking ??? Please, Christina's "artistry" goes about as deep as a kiddie pool Not even Britney tries to fool anyone. All she said was that Van Gogh sold one painting during his lifetime. He painted because he loved to paint. She made "Stripped" and was happy with it even it if didn't do well commercially. She didn't say she was a grande artiste like Van Gogh... I thought it was cool that she made a reference to art history. That's just the way I roll, baby -- can you dig it? |
|
.Ellie.
New Member
Weird
Joined: March 2005
Posts: 109
|
Post by .Ellie. on Mar 10, 2005 12:24:37 GMT -5
What about Christina Millian's "Dip it low" she completely scraped the barrel it that video! i mean come on wheres her dignity? If its any where near her clothes, then its on the floor!
|
|
|
|
Post by britneyrocks18 on Mar 10, 2005 15:49:32 GMT -5
People today seem to have a pretty warped idea of celebrity. I suppose the Osbournes and Nick and Jessica are considered "real" because they have reality TV shows. I dunno... seems kinda contrived to me. Christina's a private person so it's easy to consider her a "phony" for superficial reasons (because she changes her look, sound, etc.) Personally, I like musicians for their music. lol that's funny considering I don't even watch "reality shows" they aren't real they are scripted beyond belief. |
|
Luckie Starchild
Diamond Member
Has a special title
2020 PMA Lifetime Achievement Award, 2011 PMA winner and 8X nominee!
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 14,525
|
Post by Luckie Starchild on Mar 10, 2005 21:17:15 GMT -5
[quote author=britneyrocks18 Just like on stripped the rnb hip hop thing she did was big at that time. She's a copier who has no originality whatsoever. lol that's funny considering I don't even watch "reality shows" they aren't real they are scripted beyond belief. Actually, what's really funny is your need for a REALITY check. R&B/hip hop is not some trendy genre that was only big when "Stripped" came out. Your posts make absolutely no sense, lol. Better luck next time! |
|
Richard
New Member
Joined: January 2005
Posts: 63
|
Post by Richard on Mar 26, 2005 16:18:31 GMT -5
The first time I saw Dirrty, I was really shocked. Nice vid too.
|
|
