imbondz
2x Platinum Member
Joined: January 2006
Posts: 2,609
|
Post by imbondz on Dec 26, 2014 22:15:53 GMT -5
What is Canada's longest running #1 song?
|
|
Future Captain
4x Platinum Member
hi, i'm the visual representation of untreated mental illnesses
Joined: September 2014
Posts: 4,022
My Charts
|
Post by Future Captain on Dec 26, 2014 22:24:37 GMT -5
^I Gotta Feeling - Black Eyed Peas 16 weeks.
In addition, it also has the longest run in Canadian Hot 100 history, with 76 weeks run. Which mean, it's probably the biggest hit ever in Canadian Hot 100 history.
|
|
badrobot
3x Platinum Member
Joined: November 2006
Posts: 3,392
|
Post by badrobot on Dec 27, 2014 15:03:47 GMT -5
^That's actually since 2007.
Elton John's "Candle in the Wind 1997" spent 46 weeks at #1 in Canada and 3 years in the top 20. But, that's largely because the Canada singles market was basically dead at the time and unlike the US, they didn't incorporate airplay.
|
|
onebuffalo
Diamond Member
#LiteralLegender
I am One Buffalo.
Joined: June 2009
Posts: 27,103
|
Post by onebuffalo on Dec 27, 2014 16:27:15 GMT -5
What is Canada's longest running #1 song? Anyone have the country version of this answer? Thanks!
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2014 16:32:41 GMT -5
^That's actually since 2007. Elton John's "Candle in the Wind 1997" spent 46 weeks at #1 in Canada and 3 years in the top 20. But, that's largely because the Canada singles market was basically dead at the time and unlike the US, they didn't incorporate airplay. Where do you get the info for pre-June-2007 Canadian charts?
|
|
badrobot
3x Platinum Member
Joined: November 2006
Posts: 3,392
|
Post by badrobot on Dec 27, 2014 17:14:58 GMT -5
|
|
Gary
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2014
Posts: 45,891
|
Post by Gary on Dec 27, 2014 19:31:08 GMT -5
It was all sales based too, I believe.
|
|
imbondz
2x Platinum Member
Joined: January 2006
Posts: 2,609
|
Post by imbondz on Dec 28, 2014 6:24:07 GMT -5
^That's actually since 2007. Elton John's "Candle in the Wind 1997" spent 46 weeks at #1 in Canada and 3 years in the top 20. But, that's largely because the Canada singles market was basically dead at the time and unlike the US, they didn't incorporate airplay. Ugh. That's crazy. Kinda awkward chart wise.
|
|
brady47
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2013
Posts: 1,449
|
Post by brady47 on Dec 29, 2014 0:13:32 GMT -5
^That's actually since 2007. Elton John's "Candle in the Wind 1997" spent 46 weeks at #1 in Canada and 3 years in the top 20. But, that's largely because the Canada singles market was basically dead at the time and unlike the US, they didn't incorporate airplay. Ugh. That's crazy. Kinda awkward chart wise. Canada didn't have a legitimate singles chart before 2007. I mean a single can sell a couple hundred copies and be number one on the single charts for weeks. The Canadian Hot 100 was refreshing and I loved finally having a way to see the musical tastes of people in my country and not having to solely follow the Hot 100. There are small differences between Canadians and Americans in musical taste that I wouldn't be able to appreciate or know about without the Canadian Hot 100.
|
|
Gary
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2014
Posts: 45,891
|
Post by Gary on Dec 29, 2014 0:28:46 GMT -5
Exactly, kind of taints the 46 weeks number a bit.
|
|
DJ General
5x Platinum Member
Dupe
Joined: March 2010
Posts: 5,932
|
Post by DJ General on Dec 29, 2014 23:04:39 GMT -5
Anyone have a full list of all albums to ever sell over 500,000 units in a week, not just opening week?
|
|
crystalphnx
Platinum Member
Joined: December 2010
Posts: 1,500
|
Post by crystalphnx on Jan 27, 2015 15:10:44 GMT -5
not sure if this is the right place, but here goes: does anyone know the first album to get a re-release in the vein of The Emancipation Of Mimi: Ultra Platinum Edition, Good Girl Gone Bad: Reloaded, Teenage Dream: The Complete Confection, etc., where a few brand-new tracks are tacked onto a recently-released album to extend its promotional cycle and pad overall sales?
typically, one of these new tracks is released as a single and the album receives a slight name change (like the examples I mentioned.) I wouldn't count re-issues of "classic" albums that come out years or decades after the album's initial run, or production errors when a track is mistakenly left off and the album is re-run to include a track that was always meant to be a part of the original tracklist.
hope this makes sense! apologies if it belongs elsewhere.
|
|
|
Post by areyoureadytojump on Jan 27, 2015 15:17:19 GMT -5
^Mary J Blige's No More Drama?
|
|
renfield75
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 1,644
|
Post by renfield75 on Jan 27, 2015 15:57:20 GMT -5
^Mary J Blige's No More Drama? That's the earliest one I can think of…2 years later (2004) Usher's "Confessions" got the same treatment and sent "My Boo" to number one. Prior to these type of re-releases most artists just did separate remix albums, like J. Lo's 2002 remix record. But that practice goes back as far as Paula Abdul ("Shut Up And Dance" in 1990), Bobby Brown ("Remixes In The Key of B" in 1993), and Madonna ("You Can Dance" in 1987). I don't know for sure that Madonna's record was the first but I don't know of any before her. In the days of physical singles, artists would remix album cuts for single release to extend eras: for example, the version of George Michael's "Monkey" that topped the Hot 100 was not the same version that originally appeared on Faith. There were quite a few singles back then that were different from their album-cut counterparts. That practice also helped eventually sell greatest hits albums, since those compilations were the only way to get the hit version of songs you remembered after the physical singles had long-since vacated stores.
|
|
|
Post by areyoureadytojump on Jan 27, 2015 16:05:33 GMT -5
^Those remix albums are in a whole different category.
|
|
renfield75
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 1,644
|
Post by renfield75 on Jan 27, 2015 16:09:35 GMT -5
^Those remix albums are in a while different category. Yes of course, but it was still the precursor to the idea of getting new singles and remixes out in-between album cycles. Madonna could've just re-released "True Blue" with some remixes and included "Spotlight" (the new song on You Can Dance) but people weren't doing that back then.
|
|
|
Post by jerz on Mar 5, 2015 7:16:40 GMT -5
Who are the Asians that appeared on Billboard Hot 100 (including both Top 40 and bottom Top 40)?
Is PSY, Kyu Sakamoto and The Far East Movement are on the list?
|
|
rimetm
2x Platinum Member
Just a Good Ol' Chart Shmuck
|
Post by rimetm on Mar 5, 2015 7:24:59 GMT -5
Nobody / Wonder Girls debuted at #76, being the first K-Pop song to make the chart.
|
|
|
Post by jerz on Mar 5, 2015 20:24:17 GMT -5
Aside from Wonder Girls, who are the Asians that appeared on Billboard Hot 100 (including both Top 40 and bottom Top 40)? PSY?
|
|
WotUNeed
2x Platinum Member
Deacon Blues
Joined: April 2010
Posts: 2,935
|
Post by WotUNeed on Mar 5, 2015 20:39:12 GMT -5
Aside from Wonder Girls, who are the Asians that appeared on Billboard Hot 100 (including both Top 40 and bottom Top 40)? PSY? Psy, Wonder Girls, and Kyu Sakamoto have all charted. Far East Movement are American-born, but they have also charted, if you're counting acts of Asian descent. Along those same lines, British-born Jay Sean has also charted.
|
|
rimetm
2x Platinum Member
Just a Good Ol' Chart Shmuck
|
Post by rimetm on Mar 5, 2015 20:56:49 GMT -5
If we're counting UK Asian Underground artists, Panjabi MC hit #33 with Beware of the Boys (Mudian to Bach Ke)
|
|
suth
Charting
Joined: January 2012
Posts: 42
|
Post by suth on Mar 5, 2015 22:43:00 GMT -5
Pink Lady got to #37 with "Kiss in the Dark".
|
|
jenglisbe
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2005
Posts: 35,617
|
Post by jenglisbe on Mar 6, 2015 10:26:45 GMT -5
Exactly, kind of taints the 46 weeks number a bit. Sure, but saying a song is longest-running #1 in Canada but only talking about 7-8 years of charts is even more tainted.
|
|
Gary
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2014
Posts: 45,891
|
Post by Gary on Mar 6, 2015 10:48:05 GMT -5
Exactly, kind of taints the 46 weeks number a bit. Sure, but saying a song is longest-running #1 in Canada but only talking about 7-8 years of charts is even more tainted. LOL - Had to take a second to figure out what we were talking about. The #1 song in Canada probably gets about the same sales numbers as the #1 song in the USA(in some weeks). (Keep in mind, during this era, there is no digital songs and the movement towards restricting physical singles was in full swing) So if a song sells 500 copies in a week, regardless of radio play and album sales(I say album sales because sometimes people buy the album because the song is on it), would you really say that was the #1 song in the country?
|
|
jenglisbe
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2005
Posts: 35,617
|
Post by jenglisbe on Mar 6, 2015 11:31:32 GMT -5
Sure, but saying a song is longest-running #1 in Canada but only talking about 7-8 years of charts is even more tainted. LOL - Had to take a second to figure out what we were talking about. The #1 song in Canada probably gets about the same sales numbers as the #1 song in the USA(in some weeks). (Keep in mind, during this era, there is no digital songs and the movement towards restricting physical singles was in full swing) So if a song sells 500 copies in a week, regardless of radio play and album sales(I say album sales because sometimes people buy the album because the song is on it), would you really say that was the #1 song in the country? I think you missed my point. The initial question was, "What's the longest running #1 in Canada?" Someone replied with a stat based on the charts since 2007. I am saying if I ask about longest-running #1 ever in a country, and I get a response based on information from only the past 7 years I would feel misled.
|
|
Gary
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2014
Posts: 45,891
|
Post by Gary on Mar 6, 2015 11:52:15 GMT -5
LOL - Had to take a second to figure out what we were talking about. The #1 song in Canada probably gets about the same sales numbers as the #1 song in the USA(in some weeks). (Keep in mind, during this era, there is no digital songs and the movement towards restricting physical singles was in full swing) So if a song sells 500 copies in a week, regardless of radio play and album sales(I say album sales because sometimes people buy the album because the song is on it), would you really say that was the #1 song in the country? I think you missed my point. The initial question was, "What's the longest running #1 in Canada?" Someone replied with a stat based on the charts since 2007. I am saying if I ask about longest-running #1 ever in a country, and I get a response based on information from only the past 7 years I would feel misled. I think you got your answer. My one line comment three months ago was about the "quality" of those 46 weeks. The popularity chart in those years was very restricted and confined to a sales-only singles market where not all singles were released. That is why I said the number was tainted. That doesn't make it wrong or right but when you take that number and put it in a "longest running #1 ever" context, you start to compare things that can't be compared. Would this song have spent 46 weeks at #1 today? Probably not. Which is why I gave the "tainted" comment three months ago.
|
|
jenglisbe
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2005
Posts: 35,617
|
Post by jenglisbe on Mar 6, 2015 12:13:38 GMT -5
In other words there is no good answer to the Canada question.
|
|
brady47
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2013
Posts: 1,449
|
Post by brady47 on Mar 6, 2015 13:09:28 GMT -5
I think you missed my point. The initial question was, "What's the longest running #1 in Canada?" Someone replied with a stat based on the charts since 2007. I am saying if I ask about longest-running #1 ever in a country, and I get a response based on information from only the past 7 years I would feel misled. I think you got your answer. My one line comment three months ago was about the "quality" of those 46 weeks. The popularity chart in those years was very restricted and confined to a sales-only singles market where not all singles were released. That is why I said the number was tainted. That doesn't make it wrong or right but when you take that number and put it in a "longest running #1 ever" context, you start to compare things that can't be compared. Would this song have spent 46 weeks at #1 today? Probably not. Which is why I gave the "tainted" comment three months ago. I get what Gary is saying. The Canadian singles chart didn't have any correlation to what was popular in Canada pre-2007, before the Hot 100 came out, I just used the Canadian BDS Airplay Chart to get an idea of what was popular. I guess to be fair you can just say I Gotta Feeling is the longest running #1 since 2007 since there was no Canadian Hot 100 before that. It's unfortunate - I would have loved to see how Canadian hits like Say It Right, I'm Like a Bird, Complicated and I'm With You would have done in Canada.
|
|
|
Post by Musicguy on Apr 10, 2015 15:28:25 GMT -5
As Billboard reported that Rihanna moves closer to Madonna's total of Top 20 hits on Billboard's Hot 100, I decided to make this video ranking the top female acts with the most Top 20 hits. :)
|
|
mkarns
2x Platinum Member
Joined: February 2011
Posts: 2,239
|
Post by mkarns on Apr 12, 2015 18:49:50 GMT -5
In response to the Canada discussion, from 1964 to 2000 "RPM" magazine was published there which served seemingly as a Canadian Billboard, with a representative looking chart of the Canadian top 100 incorporating sales and airplay. The list of Canadian #1's in Wikipedia for those years uses RPM, and it doesn't have the dubious results like "Candle...1997" being in the top 10 for two years or whatever it was.
But even using that, there's a pretty recent gap (2000-07) for which I can't seem to settle on a definitive, usable singles chart. Any suggestions?
|
|