Nicholas2.0
6x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 6,666
|
Post by Nicholas2.0 on Jul 19, 2010 3:00:00 GMT -5
Top 30 - Active 41 29 GODSMACK - Love-Hate-Sex-Pain 405 191 214 1.1 I'm not even a cheerleader for this song, but that's more like it.
|
|
|
Post by arashinclowery13 on Jul 21, 2010 10:17:33 GMT -5
The song guitar rhythm very similar to east world........
|
|
|
Post by Shadows in the Dark on Jul 25, 2010 22:22:36 GMT -5
Top 20 on Active:
29 20 GODSMACK Love-Hate-Sex-Pain 659 405 254 1.744
|
|
|
Post by Shadows in the Dark on Aug 8, 2010 17:28:33 GMT -5
Top 50 on Alternative:
56 50 GODSMACK Love-Hate-Sex-Pain 146 129 17 0.508
Top 10 on Active:
14 10 GODSMACK Love-Hate-Sex-Pain 1036 944 92 2.615
|
|
rockmaniac
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2010
Posts: 2,355
|
Post by rockmaniac on Aug 13, 2010 16:18:28 GMT -5
Top 50 on Alternative: 56 50 GODSMACK Love-Hate-Sex-Pain 146 129 17 0.508 Top 10 on Active: 14 10 GODSMACK Love-Hate-Sex-Pain 1036 944 92 2.615 #19!!!
|
|
|
Post by Shadows in the Dark on Aug 23, 2010 12:15:55 GMT -5
Top 40 on Alternative:
45 40 GODSMACK Love-Hate-Sex-Pain 218 182 36 0.711
|
|
|
Post by Shadows in the Dark on Sept 13, 2010 10:28:59 GMT -5
Top 30 on Alternative:
35 30 GODSMACK Love-Hate-Sex-Pain 273 247 26 1.018
|
|
|
Post by Shadows in the Dark on Sept 27, 2010 12:45:37 GMT -5
Top 5 on Active:
7 5 GODSMACK Love-Hate-Sex-Pain 1455 1436 19 4.277
Their 20th Top 5?
|
|
rockmaniac
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2010
Posts: 2,355
|
Post by rockmaniac on Sept 27, 2010 15:06:40 GMT -5
Top 5 on Active: 7 5 GODSMACK Love-Hate-Sex-Pain 1455 1436 19 4.277 Their 20th Top 5? no. it's their 14th top 5
|
|
jvandyck87
5x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 5,213
|
Post by jvandyck87 on Sept 27, 2010 16:34:38 GMT -5
^ Are you using wikipedia Billboard data to approximate active rock chart peaking?
While I don't think it's their 20th (that would mean every single they've ever released went top 5 on active, which I don't think is the case), if it reaches top 5 on Billboard it will be their 14th top 5 on Billboard Mainstream Rock. That said, there are a handful of songs that approached but missed the top 5 on Billboard that may have gone top 5 on active rock such as "Whatever", "Bad Religion", "Serenity", "Touché", and "Good Times, Bad Times." In order for the number to reach 20 top 5 singles, "Bad Magick" would also have to have gone top 5 on active, and a #12 peak on Billboard Mainstream Rock pretty much makes that impossible.
|
|
rockmaniac
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2010
Posts: 2,355
|
Post by rockmaniac on Sept 27, 2010 17:07:50 GMT -5
^ Are you using wikipedia Billboard data to approximate active rock chart peaking? While I don't think it's their 20th (that would mean every single they've ever released went top 5 on active, which I don't think is the case), if it reaches top 5 on Billboard it will be their 14th top 5 on Billboard Mainstream Rock. That said, there are a handful of songs that approached but missed the top 5 on Billboard that may have gone top 5 on active rock such as "Whatever", "Bad Religion", "Serenity", "Touché", and "Good Times, Bad Times." In order for the number to reach 20 top 5 singles, "Bad Magick" would also have to have gone top 5 on active, and a #12 peak on Billboard Mainstream Rock pretty much makes that impossible. I pretty much remember the chart data
|
|
jvandyck87
5x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 5,213
|
Post by jvandyck87 on Sept 27, 2010 17:41:31 GMT -5
^ Are you using wikipedia Billboard data to approximate active rock chart peaking? While I don't think it's their 20th (that would mean every single they've ever released went top 5 on active, which I don't think is the case), if it reaches top 5 on Billboard it will be their 14th top 5 on Billboard Mainstream Rock. That said, there are a handful of songs that approached but missed the top 5 on Billboard that may have gone top 5 on active rock such as "Whatever", "Bad Religion", "Serenity", "Touché", and "Good Times, Bad Times." In order for the number to reach 20 top 5 singles, "Bad Magick" would also have to have gone top 5 on active, and a #12 peak on Billboard Mainstream Rock pretty much makes that impossible. I pretty much remember the chart data You remember chart peak data for every Godsmack single back to 1999 independently of Billboard wikipedia entries updating and perhaps tainting your memory over that timespan? That's impressive, if true.
|
|
rockmaniac
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2010
Posts: 2,355
|
Post by rockmaniac on Sept 27, 2010 17:47:18 GMT -5
I pretty much remember the chart data You remember chart peak data for every Godsmack single back to 1999 independently of Billboard wikipedia entries updating and perhaps tainting your memory over that timespan? That's impressive, if true. I've been using the old Billboard site for a couple of years til it was taken down
|
|
jvandyck87
5x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 5,213
|
Post by jvandyck87 on Sept 27, 2010 20:30:12 GMT -5
^Exactly. The point I'm making is that you're remembering Billboard numbers. We're talking about mediabase active rock, which may differ slightly. Some of those #7 peaks on Billboard Mainstream Rock could easily have been top 5's at mediabase.
Just a quick question, when did Mediabase develop a chart / start monitoring active rock as a format? I was only converted from Billboard to mediabase by this website, and didn't know mediabase even existed until about three years ago.
|
|
|
Post by thisbeautifulmess on Sept 28, 2010 8:11:24 GMT -5
Just a quick question, when did Mediabase develop a chart / start monitoring active rock as a format? I was only converted from Billboard to mediabase by this website, and didn't know mediabase even existed until about three years ago. First R&R active rock chart was 06/23/1995. "Whatever" reached #4 on R&R "Bad religion" reached #4 on R&R "Serenity" reached #7 on R&R I don't have my data tabulated for mid-2004 onward yet.
|
|
Devin
Diamond Member
Best Rock Poster 2011―2014
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 14,015
My Charts
Pronouns: He/Him
|
Post by Devin on Sept 28, 2010 13:11:49 GMT -5
It's looks like this song is soon peaking... any next single suggestions? I vote for "Shadow of a Soul".
|
|
rockmaniac
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2010
Posts: 2,355
|
Post by rockmaniac on Sept 28, 2010 13:25:49 GMT -5
It's looks like this song is soon peaking... any next single suggestions? I vote for "Shadow of a Soul". I'm going with What If
|
|
pen
9x Platinum Member
A true gentleman leaves no puzzle unsolved.
Joined: July 2005
Posts: 9,408
|
Post by pen on Sept 28, 2010 13:27:14 GMT -5
It's looks like this song is soon peaking... any next single suggestions? I vote for "Shadow of a Soul". I'm going with What If
|
|
Devin
Diamond Member
Best Rock Poster 2011―2014
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 14,015
My Charts
Pronouns: He/Him
|
Post by Devin on Sept 28, 2010 18:29:23 GMT -5
Just listened to "What If?". It sounds like a good third single, but I still rather "SOAS". If it is "What If?", it'll need to shave off 2 or 3 minutes (unless they're Metallica )
|
|
rockmaniac
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2010
Posts: 2,355
|
Post by rockmaniac on Sept 28, 2010 18:41:20 GMT -5
if What If is the third single, a radio edit could last 3 1/2 or 4 minutes
|
|
(Artie Ziff)
5x Platinum Member
Joined: June 2007
Posts: 5,993
|
Post by (Artie Ziff) on Sept 28, 2010 20:56:17 GMT -5
Saints And Sinners. Classic radio Godsmack.
|
|
|
Post by arashinclowery13 on Sept 29, 2010 9:24:42 GMT -5
The best choice is Saints and Sinners
|
|
lockebox
5x Platinum Member
Joined: April 2009
Posts: 5,739
|
Post by lockebox on Sept 29, 2010 16:55:55 GMT -5
"Saints and Sinners" for me too. "Love-Hate-Sex-Pain" still may have a little left to go, though.
|
|
|
Post by arashinclowery13 on Oct 31, 2010 3:37:11 GMT -5
What do you think about another #1 single from Godsmack. Love Hate Sex Pain must be another one.
|
|
|
Post by Jorge_Str [Som3on3] on Oct 31, 2010 5:48:20 GMT -5
What do you think about another #1 single from Godsmack. Love Hate Sex Pain must be another one. Porn star dancing will block this
|
|
|
Post by Shadows in the Dark on Oct 31, 2010 21:25:40 GMT -5
Yeah, sorry to burst your bubble, but I don't think this is going #1. It did well enough anyway.
|
|