lockebox
5x Platinum Member
Joined: April 2009
Posts: 5,739
|
Post by lockebox on Feb 1, 2011 19:18:21 GMT -5
Second single from "For We Are Many". The band are currently shooting a video for this song. I prefer "Faithless", but this is solid too, and would have been my second choice.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jorge_Str [Som3on3] on Feb 2, 2011 8:23:57 GMT -5
decent song, definitely not what i expected for 2nd single, but i guess their album is full of great songs so thats ok!
|
|
lockebox
5x Platinum Member
Joined: April 2009
Posts: 5,739
|
Post by lockebox on Feb 2, 2011 21:10:20 GMT -5
^ What were you expecting? This is certainly among the most radio friendly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jorge_Str [Som3on3] on Feb 3, 2011 14:00:27 GMT -5
^ What were you expecting? This is certainly among the most radio friendly. i don't know about being radio friendly or not although it's one of the finest songs of the album..i was expecting one of faithless, won't go quietly, keepers of fellow man, the waiting one..i don't know why i didn't get into this song at first but right i really like it |
|
lockebox
5x Platinum Member
Joined: April 2009
Posts: 5,739
|
Post by lockebox on Apr 5, 2011 11:14:12 GMT -5
Goes for adds to Active on April 18th. |
|
|
|
Post by American Idiot on Apr 5, 2011 11:17:57 GMT -5
Damn, I guess I see how great our "search" tool works. I'll try to delete my thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jorge_Str [Som3on3] on Apr 6, 2011 8:32:20 GMT -5
it was about time for this to get a release date, hopefully another top 20 hit
|
|
rockmaniac
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2010
Posts: 2,355
|
Post by rockmaniac on Apr 6, 2011 8:44:58 GMT -5
it was about time for this to get a release date, hopefully another top 20 hit I second this |
|
|
|
Post by Jorge_Str [Som3on3] on Apr 11, 2011 10:22:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Shadows in the Dark on Apr 12, 2011 9:04:07 GMT -5
Top 50 on Active:
71 50 ALL THAT REMAINS The Last Time 91 33 58 0.207
|
|
rockmaniac
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2010
Posts: 2,355
|
Post by rockmaniac on Apr 14, 2011 16:48:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Jorge_Str [Som3on3] on Apr 17, 2011 19:39:55 GMT -5
is there any place that you can watch the video? because in every site that i searched there's a note when you try to watch the video saying "Sorry, the video is not available at this time"
|
|
rockmaniac
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2010
Posts: 2,355
|
Post by rockmaniac on Apr 17, 2011 19:52:59 GMT -5
see it if it's on Yahoo Music
|
|
|
|
Post by Jorge_Str [Som3on3] on Apr 17, 2011 20:06:22 GMT -5
see it if it's on Yahoo Music i've tried dude, it says that is available in certain areas (probably my area is not included), i guess i just have to wait for someone to upload it on youtube |
|
rockmaniac
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2010
Posts: 2,355
|
Post by rockmaniac on Apr 17, 2011 20:11:37 GMT -5
it'll be on their VEVO YouTube page soon
|
|
|
|
Post by Jorge_Str [Som3on3] on Apr 17, 2011 20:42:56 GMT -5
it'll be on their VEVO YouTube page soon can't wait to watch it |
|
rockmaniac
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2010
Posts: 2,355
|
Post by rockmaniac on Apr 19, 2011 21:31:37 GMT -5
it'll be on their VEVO YouTube page soon can't wait to watch it wait is over |
|
|
|
Post by Jorge_Str [Som3on3] on Apr 19, 2011 22:08:11 GMT -5
yes, for you! unfortunately in my region is not available... |
|
jvandyck87
5x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 5,213
|
Post by jvandyck87 on Apr 19, 2011 22:17:08 GMT -5
Wow this song was promising, but the chorus is SOOOO bad. 6-4-1-5...really? What, are they Avril Lavigne now? Let's get Adam D back producing them so they don't churn out this shit. Pathetic.
Oh and Killswitch might benefit from Adam D producing them again as well.
|
|
pen
9x Platinum Member
A true gentleman leaves no puzzle unsolved.
Joined: July 2005
Posts: 9,408
|
Post by pen on Apr 19, 2011 22:34:08 GMT -5
6-4-1-5?
|
|
jvandyck87
5x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 5,213
|
Post by jvandyck87 on Apr 19, 2011 23:09:56 GMT -5
vi-IV-I-V. It is THE pop chord progression of the last decade. Kelly Clarkson, three of Avril's biggest singles, Iyaz, One Republic, Ryan Cabrera, Michelle Branch, Lady Gaga...to name a few. The choruses of The Fray - "You Found Me" and Breaking Benjamin - "The Diary Of Jane" use it too, but those songs are better than most that are guilty of it.
This chord progression was originally nicknamed the "sensitive female" progression, but a lot of huge pop songs from both genders have used it recently. The point is, All That Remains has no business using this chord progression in the chorus of their songs. And if you're gonna be THAT cliché, you better be able to back it up with a really good song around it like The Fray or Breaking Benjamin did, but All That Remains imo churned out a boring-as-s**t song with it.
EDIT: Making fun of Nick for his newfound guilty pleasure reminded me that the chorus of HU's "Hear Me Now" also has a vi-IV-I-V chord progression. Icky....
|
|
|
|
Post by Shadows in the Dark on Apr 24, 2011 17:15:59 GMT -5
Top 40 on Active:
44 40 ALL THAT REMAINS The Last Time 208 138 70 0.348
|
|
|
|
Post by Shadows in the Dark on May 8, 2011 17:18:38 GMT -5
Top 30 on Active:
35 29 ALL THAT REMAINS The Last Time 375 264 111 0.624
|
|
Nicholas2.0
6x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 6,666 
|
Post by Nicholas2.0 on May 12, 2011 22:16:12 GMT -5
EDIT: Making fun of Nick for his newfound guilty pleasure reminded me that the chorus of HU's "Hear Me Now" also has a vi-IV-I-V chord progression. Icky.... LOL  Wow this song was promising, but the chorus is SOOOO bad. 6-4-1-5...really? What, are they Avril Lavigne now? Let's get Adam D back producing them so they don't churn out this s**t. Pathetic. Well I liked it. Heck, by the time it was over, I already liked it better than "Hold On." But I couldn't even hear the progression in relation to those particular Kelly Clarkson, Michelle Branch, Avril Lavigne and Hollywood Undead songs that you're obviously referring to. |
|
jvandyck87
5x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 5,213
|
Post by jvandyck87 on May 13, 2011 8:01:10 GMT -5
^For what it's worth I liked the rest of the song, which actually makes me weirdly hate it more. I admit it's almost unfair, but the songs I tend to hate most are the ones that start promisingly and then just slay you with the either the overwhelmingly generic and cheesy chorus or the chorus that fears sounding generic and cheesy and thus ends up sounding completely underwhelming. But if you're gonna give me a really good intro, verse, and pre-chorus, then don't let me down with that pop-punk crap. That's how my psyche feels about this song.
|
|
pen
9x Platinum Member
A true gentleman leaves no puzzle unsolved.
Joined: July 2005
Posts: 9,408
|
Post by pen on May 13, 2011 8:22:48 GMT -5
Hey! I will not hear the good name of pop-punk besmirched.
|
|
jvandyck87
5x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 5,213
|
Post by jvandyck87 on May 13, 2011 8:33:44 GMT -5
There is good pop-punk and there is pop-punk crap. That chorus was of the pop-punk crap variety. Don't worry, my Blink 182 and New Found Glory CD collection suggests that I certainly can like some bands in the genre.
|
|
|
|
Post by American Idiot on May 13, 2011 9:13:16 GMT -5
There is good pop-punk and there is pop-punk crap. That chorus was of the pop-punk crap variety. Don't worry, my Blink 182 and New Found Glory CD collection suggests that I certainly can like some bands in the genre. I had to re-listen to this to what you were talking about, and now I completely see it. As a pop-punk fanatic, I agree that there are amazing bands in the sub-genre and then there are some that just wish that they could be anywhere as good as the phenoms. Those are the kind of bands that make me think of how generic and cheesy they sound, which really turn me away from having a high morale of them. This chorus certainly fits right in there. |
|
Nicholas2.0
6x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 6,666
|
Post by Nicholas2.0 on May 14, 2011 15:30:26 GMT -5
There is good pop-punk and there is pop-punk crap. That chorus was of the pop-punk crap variety. See, I'm ignoring Phil's gruff delivery and just focusing on the melody and I can't even hear this as the chorus of a pop-punk song either. |
|
jvandyck87
5x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 5,213
|
Post by jvandyck87 on May 14, 2011 15:33:34 GMT -5
There is good pop-punk and there is pop-punk crap. That chorus was of the pop-punk crap variety. See, I'm ignoring Phil's gruff delivery and just focusing on the melody and I can't even hear this as the chorus of a pop-punk song either. The instrumentation is typical uninteresting pop-punk, and then the vocal melody is not catchy enough to be a pop song. It's just boring. It's a shame to me because I like the pre-chorus part quite a lot. |
|
![Jorge_Str [Som3on3] Avatar](http://storage.proboards.com/1258812/avatar/Ckf_SvW4JZTB5VouxIVv.jpg)
