Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 10:10:06 GMT -5
The top 100 page is still there and so is your music
|
|
Junkiex
4x Platinum Member
Joined: June 2009
Posts: 4,431
|
Post by Junkiex on Nov 16, 2010 10:12:48 GMT -5
The "Music>This week" section was neglected to the bottom part of the home page.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 10:13:30 GMT -5
That's just the way it is with the Beatles, they tend to supercede everybody else. :)
|
|
HolidayGuy
Diamond Member
Joined: December 2003
Posts: 33,882
|
Post by HolidayGuy on Nov 16, 2010 10:19:40 GMT -5
^Indeed.
I don't see the 1 album- but, it's not like those songs aren't available on other releases.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 10:22:20 GMT -5
These would be just the studio releases, from the box set from the looks of things
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 10:24:40 GMT -5
These would be just the studio releases, from the box set from the looks of things The red and blue albums are also available.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 10:31:20 GMT -5
First Beatles' album, Abbey Road, has shown up on iTunes album chart at #195
and so it begins...
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 10:31:44 GMT -5
In other words everything digitally remastered from the past year
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 10:45:15 GMT -5
In other words everything digitally remastered from the past year Yep, looks that way.
|
|
BlueSwan
Gold Member
Joined: June 2009
Posts: 661
|
Post by BlueSwan on Nov 16, 2010 10:50:23 GMT -5
I'm sorry, but I don't think the impact will be THAT huge and certainly nothing compared to Michael Jackson last year. The vast majority of people interested in The Beatles will have their CD's already and surely it ain't that hard to import your CD's to itunes.
Sure a bunch of their hits will make the digital tracks chart for a couple of weeks but I'm positive that they won't dominate the upper regions of the chart. Suggestions that the Beatles would have the entire top 10 to themselves are ridiculous, which I'm sure will finally be proven now, but we'll see.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 11:02:04 GMT -5
Abbey Road is already at #21, Sgt Pepper is at #27, White Album is at #29, Beatles Box Set, which sells for $149 is at #23!
|
|
worldwide
2x Platinum Member
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 2,145
|
Post by worldwide on Nov 16, 2010 11:11:29 GMT -5
I can't. I just can't. I bet more than half of the iTunes regulars are like "WTF? Take this away I want my music back" The Beatles are the music.
|
|
|
Post by ListenToItTwice on Nov 16, 2010 11:12:07 GMT -5
First songs to chart:
#191. Let it Be #199. Here Comes the Sun
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 11:16:36 GMT -5
They are about to take over the Albums chart and some of their singles are already in the Top 200.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 11:22:41 GMT -5
Update: Abbey Road #15 Beatles Box Set #18 White Album #19 Sgt. Pepper #20
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 12:05:17 GMT -5
I'm sorry, but I don't think the impact will be THAT huge and certainly nothing compared to Michael Jackson last year. The vast majority of people interested in The Beatles will have their CD's already and surely it ain't that hard to import your CD's to itunes. Sure a bunch of their hits will make the digital tracks chart for a couple of weeks but I'm positive that they won't dominate the upper regions of the chart. Suggestions that the Beatles would have the entire top 10 to themselves are ridiculous, which I'm sure will finally be proven now, but we'll see. The itunes generation will obviously be buying these. Those who get their music on the internet and have never seen a music store. Early results are that this will be pretty big
|
|
HolidayGuy
Diamond Member
Joined: December 2003
Posts: 33,882
|
Post by HolidayGuy on Nov 16, 2010 12:28:38 GMT -5
As none of the Beatles recently passed on, it shouldn't have the impact we saw with Michael Jackson's music. But, it should do pretty well, regardless of the fact that the music already has sold millions upon millions.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 12:30:44 GMT -5
and still sells to this day
Beatles albums have been fixtures on the catalog chart for years (predominantly Beatles 1)
Despite the impression that everybody already has all the music
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 12:31:29 GMT -5
In fact due to catalog success, as we know Beatles 1 was the best selling album of the last decade
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 12:34:17 GMT -5
2m, please do the world a favour...
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 12:35:22 GMT -5
2m, please do the world a favour... And ignore you? Glad to do it Thanks
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 12:36:49 GMT -5
I don't think you understood what I meant. It's annoying to read multiple posts from you in a row that are just stream of conscious. You're supposed to modify it all into one post.
|
|
Me. I Am l!nk!nfan815...
Diamond Member
All Lives Can’t Matter Until Black Lives Matter
Joined: February 2008
Posts: 18,330
|
Post by Me. I Am l!nk!nfan815... on Nov 16, 2010 12:38:27 GMT -5
2m, please do the world a favour... Amen!
|
|
|
Post by ListenToItTwice on Nov 16, 2010 12:51:10 GMT -5
There are 122 Beatles songs in the Rock Top 200. This is legendary.
(17 Beatles songs in the overall Top 200, led by #84, Let it Be.)
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 14:13:59 GMT -5
Apple says iTunes will sell music from Beatles JESSICA MINTZ From Associated Press November 16, 2010 1:57 PM EST SEATTLE (AP) — "Beatles for Sale" is finally for sale on iTunes — along with the rest of the Fab Four's albums, from "Please Please Me" to "Revolver" to "Abbey Road."
The Beatles had been the most prominent holdout from iTunes and other online music services. On Tuesday, Apple Inc. said its iTunes store will start selling downloads of songs and albums from the group, in an agreement with the Beatles' recording label, EMI Group Ltd., and its management company, Apple Corps Ltd.
Apple will sell 13 remastered Beatles studio albums, the two-volume "Past Masters" set and the classic "Red" and "Blue" collections. People can buy individual songs for $1.29 apiece or download entire albums, at $12.99 for a single album and $19.99 for a double.
For $149, Apple is also selling a special digital box set that includes a download of the 41-minute movie of the Beatles' first U.S. concert, "Live at the Washington Coliseum, 1964."
Until Tuesday, Apple Corps had resisted selling Beatles music as online downloads. The situation was exacerbated by a long-running trademark dispute between Apple Inc. and Apple Corps. It was resolved in 2007 when the companies agreed on joint use of the apple logo and name, and many people saw that as paving the way for an agreement for online access to Beatles songs.
With the Beatles now in Apple's music store, the number of holdouts has dwindled. Garth Brooks, Kid Rock and AC/DC are among the remaining artists who refuse to sell their work through Apple. Some want more control over pricing or the ability to force shoppers to download entire albums instead of individual songs.
Until now, to listen to Beatles songs on iPods, you'd have to obtain a CD and "rip" an online version of it — or find someone who already has, legalities aside.
Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO, couldn't resist celebrating the Beatles' arrival on iTunes with an obvious quip.
"It has been a long and winding road to get here," he said in a statement, referencing the song "The Long and Winding Road" from the Beatles' 1970 "Let it Be" album.
"Thanks to the Beatles and EMI, we are now realizing a dream we've had since we launched iTunes ten years ago," Jobs said.
In a press release, former band members and their relatives all gave the deal their blessings, including Sir Paul McCartney; Beatles drummer Ringo Starr; Yoko Ono Lennon, John Lennon's widow; and Olivia Harrison, widow of George Harrison.
"I am particularly glad to no longer be asked when the Beatles are coming to iTunes," Starr said.
The deal gives Apple a sweet public relations boost at the start of the holiday shopping season, but sales of Beatles music won't make much of a financial impact on the company.
Brian Marshall, an analyst for Gleacher & Co., said he believes Beatles fans with iPods and other digital music players have already converted their physical CDs into digital tracks. Even if people do rush to their computers for a "Yellow Submarine" fix, Apple's other businesses are the real moneymakers. In the most recent quarter, Apple's revenue was $20.3 billion, and iTunes sales made up just 5 percent, Marshall said.
For the music industry, the arrival of the Beatles for download might mean even less.
"The digital music market (and the young music fans record labels desperately need to get engaged) need new music products, not yesteryear's hits repackaged," said Mark Mulligan, a Forrester analyst, in a statement.
Apple swapped out its home page design for a black and white image of the Beatles in silhouette.
Apple, which is based in Cupertino, Calif., will also be running a series of minimalist television commercials that combine footage and photos of the band with classic songs such as "All You Need is Love" and "Let it Be."
Apple shares slipped $5.62, or 1.8 percent, to $301.41 in midday trading Tuesday.
___
|
|
pnobelysk
Diamond Member
Joined: November 2009
Posts: 10,116
|
Post by pnobelysk on Nov 16, 2010 17:45:08 GMT -5
As none of the Beatles recently passed on, it shouldn't have the impact we saw with Michael Jackson's music. But, it should do pretty well, regardless of the fact that the music already has sold millions upon millions. certainly not a jackson impact/ and they shouldve done beatles week on dancing with the stars and glee. then we couldve seen some major sales
|
|
|
Post by ListenToItTwice on Nov 16, 2010 17:56:02 GMT -5
As none of the Beatles recently passed on, it shouldn't have the impact we saw with Michael Jackson's music. But, it should do pretty well, regardless of the fact that the music already has sold millions upon millions. certainly not a jackson impact/ and they shouldve done beatles week on dancing with the stars and glee. then we couldve seen some major sales It may not be a Jackson-sized chart takeover week, but I think that many of these songs and albums are going to have excellent digital-sales longevity. I daresay that "Let it Be" might become another "Don't Stop Believing" in that regard, and Abbey Road another... successful Catalog album on the digital charts.
|
|
Nick
8x Platinum Member
Joined: August 2004
Posts: 8,682
|
Post by Nick on Nov 16, 2010 19:04:18 GMT -5
Why are these 40 year old Beatles singles priced at 1.29? No wonder there is so much illegal downloading going on.
The Beatles are legends, the surviving members don't need the money.
Old songs should be .69. Oh well.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 19:07:58 GMT -5
They are "old songs" but they are a hot commodity
|
|
Hefty Hanna
Diamond Member
a prettier jesus
Joined: August 2007
Posts: 20,343
|
Post by Hefty Hanna on Nov 16, 2010 19:08:38 GMT -5
Everybody is so pressed. Purchasing a slew of Beatle tracks in a few minutes. Why are these 40 year old Beatles singles priced at 1.29? No wonder there is so much illegal downloading going on. The Beatles are legends, the surviving members don't need the money. Old songs should be .69. Oh well. To be frank, pricing a Beatles track at .69 and a nameless song in the Top 10 now at 1.29 is incredibly insulting.
|
|