EvanJ
6x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 6,371
|
Post by EvanJ on Jul 14, 2004 14:36:44 GMT -5
I hope this doesn't happen. The only good thing is that Nassau-Suffolk isn't listed. www.radioandrecords.com/Newsroom/2004_07_14/topstory.aspInfinity Sticks To Its Guns On Ratings Arbitron this morning released its "client exclusive" market list for the spring 2004 survey period, and it clearly reflects Infinity's refusal to agree to a new contract with the ratings company. While spring results are set to roll Friday, news organizations including R&R are now prohibited from offering 12+ quarterly data for 106 markets — including the entire top 10 — for a six-month period. The new markets include, in alphabetical order, Atlanta; Austin; Baltimore; Boston; Charlotte; Chicago; Cincinnati; Colorado Springs; Columbus, OH; Dallas; Detroit; Denver; Fresno; Hartford; Indianapolis; Las Vegas; Los Angeles; Milwaukee; Minneapolis; New Orleans; New York; Orlando; Palm Springs, CA; Phoenix; Philadelphia; Pittsburgh; Riverside; San Antonio; San Diego; San Francisco; San Jose; Seattle; St. Louis; Tampa; Victor Valley, CA; Washington; and West Palm Beach. There are 28 other markets that are holdovers from the winter 2004 survey. Additionally, the noncontinuously measured markets of Ft. Wayne, IN and Gainesville were added to the embargo list. Meanwhile, R&R has learned that several Infinity stations' sales and marketing staffers have already received training on how to work without Arbitron data.
|
|
|
Post by snoman on Jul 14, 2004 16:31:08 GMT -5
Welcome to Houston... land of the embargoed "client exclusive" ratings. You had to know back when all this deregulation madness started happening, that Arbitron would become obsolete for them. Companies now can sell package deals for all their stations and they don't necessarily need ratings to sell 4 100,000 watt FM's and 2 50,000 watt AM's. They can show clients coverage and do their own research. They have found a way to cut out the middle man. I'm actually surprised that companies like Infinity have waited so long to do this. Now, don't read anything in to this, I think it is total B.S. and I'm not praising what they are doing. It is just the nature of the beast these days. >:( :(
|
|
|
Post by The Music Man on Jul 14, 2004 16:46:01 GMT -5
Oh, I am SO PISSED! I follow a lot of those markets' ratings and thanks to Infinity, I no longer can do that. Now I have to hope that the guys at Radio-Info can hook me up... >:(
|
|
Drew
Gold Member
Joined: July 2004
Posts: 658
|
Post by Drew on Jul 15, 2004 7:24:32 GMT -5
that s*cks! >:(
|
|
|
Post by reception on Jul 15, 2004 19:53:47 GMT -5
Ridiculous.
|
|
Edf85
7x Platinum Member
Most definitely in the place to be. T-Boz. Chilli. Never forget Left Eye.
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 7,092
|
Post by Edf85 on Jul 16, 2004 3:45:27 GMT -5
Im confused ???
|
|
EvanJ
6x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 6,371
|
Post by EvanJ on Jul 16, 2004 13:17:26 GMT -5
Arbitron Reconsiders Its 'Client Exclusive' Market Lists Data for continuously measured markets available Following concerns from editors and reporters throughout the U.S. that cover the radio industry, Arbitron today agreed to reconsider the markets that were designated "client exclusive" for the spring 2004 survey. As a result, Arbitron has agreed to make 12+ quarterly reports available for continuously measured markets for the spring survey — not just the markets that had been added to the list this week. Noncontinuously measured markets that were previously designated "market exclusive" will remain on the list until further notice.
Update: Although they are still labeled Spring Part 2, the Spring final ratings were released today as usual for New York, Nassau-Suffolk, Middlesex-Somerset-Union, and Westchester.
|
|