Duca
3x Platinum Member
Joined: January 2013
Posts: 3,137
|
Post by Duca on Jul 11, 2016 14:50:25 GMT -5
Most weeks at #1 on the Hot 100's component charts in 2016: 14 weeks: Can't Stop the Feeling!*14 weeks: Love Yourself*12 weeks: Panda*10 weeks: Work*7 weeks: Sorry*7 weeks: 7 Years 5 weeks: One Dance*3 weeks: Hello 2 weeks: Pillowtalk*2 weeks: Purple Rain 2 weeks: My House 1 week: No 1 week: Piece by Piece 1 week: Pop Style *topped the Hot 100  Justins punching! I'm pretty sure Hello topped the Hot 100 in 2016 as well lol Its final week at #1 was technically the week ending Dec. 31.  |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2016 14:54:38 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure Hello topped the Hot 100 in 2016 as well lol Its final week at #1 was technically the week ending Dec. 31.  well if that's also when it got those three weeks atop component charts then it shouldn't be included at all unless its last 3 weeks at #1 on airplay were after that week |
|
Duca
3x Platinum Member
Joined: January 2013
Posts: 3,137
|
Post by Duca on Jul 11, 2016 14:56:17 GMT -5
Its final week at #1 was technically the week ending Dec. 31. well if that's also when it got those three weeks atop component charts then it shouldn't be included at all unless its last 3 weeks at #1 on airplay were after that week They were, it ruled Radio Songs for three more weeks after losing the Hot 100 #1. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2016 18:56:17 GMT -5
Credit to kworb.net YouTube Building Chart (7/9/2016) * Wake Up has dropped out again. I'm pretty sure it's on its way out.
* I can already tell that Panda's gonna stick around on youtube for months on end... |
|
|
|
Post by ListenToItTwice on Jul 11, 2016 21:13:34 GMT -5
"One Dance" now has a combined 22 weeks at #1 in the US and the UK (9 in the US, 13 in the UK) - the record, unless I'm missing something, is 23 - for "Everything I Do (I Do it For You)" (7 in the US, 16 in the UK).
|
|
forg
2x Platinum Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,356 
|
Post by forg on Jul 11, 2016 21:35:14 GMT -5
Very pleased with Let It Go finally hitting the top 20
|
|
THINKIN BOUT YOU
Platinum Member
a good-looking gay man
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,364
|
Post by THINKIN BOUT YOU on Jul 11, 2016 21:41:24 GMT -5
"One Dance" now has a combined 22 weeks at #1 in the US and the UK (9 in the US, 13 in the UK) - the record, unless I'm missing something, is 23 - for "Everything I Do (I Do it For You)" (7 in the US, 16 in the UK). Isn't UK chart moving really fast? How many songs have passed the 10 week mark atop since the day one? |
|
|
|
Post by ListenToItTwice on Jul 11, 2016 21:43:36 GMT -5
"One Dance" now has a combined 22 weeks at #1 in the US and the UK (9 in the US, 13 in the UK) - the record, unless I'm missing something, is 23 - for "Everything I Do (I Do it For You)" (7 in the US, 16 in the UK). Isn't UK chart moving really fast? How many songs have passed the 10 week mark atop since the day one? Only 9, if you can believe it: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_Singles_Chart_records_and_statistics#Most_weeks_at_number_one |
|
THINKIN BOUT YOU
Platinum Member
a good-looking gay man
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,364
|
Post by THINKIN BOUT YOU on Jul 11, 2016 21:53:59 GMT -5
One Dance is like Uptown Funk of UK chart..
Still don't understand its attraction at all.. It sounds like a short demo rather than a complete song, and it's just a little catchy and not catchy enough. The piano sounds mechanical and the sample cheesy and lazy just snapped right on. Production-wise it's very cheap and the lyrics and his performance are both really bland. Too Good is a much better song imo and I'm glad it's climbing the chart.
|
|
Caviar
Diamond Member
Queen X
Joined: October 2003
Posts: 31,164
My Charts
Pronouns: He/his
|
Post by Caviar on Jul 11, 2016 22:40:20 GMT -5
I've always found the UK singles chart so fascinating.
|
|
fridayteenage
5x Platinum Member
Shake it Off
Joined: April 2008
Posts: 5,493
|
Post by fridayteenage on Jul 11, 2016 23:06:39 GMT -5
So putting aside that Locked Away anomaly last year, I think we have the lowest #1 seller, lowest #2 seller, lowest #3 seller, and lowest #4 seller since 2006. Sad.
|
|
85la
3x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 3,916
|
Post by 85la on Jul 12, 2016 0:27:56 GMT -5
So putting aside that Locked Away anomaly last year, I think we have the lowest #1 seller, lowest #2 seller, lowest #3 seller, and lowest #4 seller since 2006. Sad. Yeah, but you have to look at the other side of it - the continued proliferation of streaming, which will probably be a much better business model for the industry long-term. |
|
Enigma.
Diamond Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 14,170
|
Post by Enigma. on Jul 12, 2016 2:19:26 GMT -5
Fascinating that there are so many one place climbs in top 20.
|
|
popbox
3x Platinum Member
Dupe
Joined: January 2013
Posts: 3,493
|
Post by popbox on Jul 12, 2016 2:35:16 GMT -5
The #1 race is about to get very exciting soon, with Bruno, Katy, Britney, and Sia potentially all competing for it at the same time.
|
|
Enigma.
Diamond Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 14,170
|
Post by Enigma. on Jul 12, 2016 4:00:41 GMT -5
Britney? No.
|
|
Bigfatliar 3
Platinum Member
cool people call songs "joint" which is little inappropriate to me cuz i think of an elbow or someth
|
Post by Bigfatliar 3 on Jul 12, 2016 4:32:01 GMT -5
I dont see Britney will take over #1. She is done.
|
|
velaxti
2x Platinum Member
Joined: March 2013
Posts: 2,014
|
Post by velaxti on Jul 12, 2016 6:38:48 GMT -5
"One Dance" now has a combined 22 weeks at #1 in the US and the UK (9 in the US, 13 in the UK) - the record, unless I'm missing something, is 23 - for "Everything I Do (I Do it For You)" (7 in the US, 16 in the UK). Isn't UK chart moving really fast? How many songs have passed the 10 week mark atop since the day one? The UK chart used to move REALLY fast, yes. But it moved slower after downloads were included (although record companies did organise themselves to get as many #1s as possible so if you look at only the #1s and not the rest of the chart it seems faster than it really was in the download age), and now that streaming has been included, it moves even slower. It seems to move at a similar pace to the Hot 100 now. :( |
|
jenglisbe
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2005
Posts: 35,611
|
Post by jenglisbe on Jul 12, 2016 8:37:51 GMT -5
The #1 race is about to get very exciting soon, with Bruno, Katy, Britney, and Sia potentially all competing for it at the same time. Bruno? I must have missed an announcement. |
|
carreramd
Charting
Joined: September 2015
Posts: 406
|
Post by carreramd on Jul 12, 2016 8:49:30 GMT -5
Isn't UK chart moving really fast? How many songs have passed the 10 week mark atop since the day one? The UK chart used to move REALLY fast, yes. But it moved slower after downloads were included (although record companies did organise themselves to get as many #1s as possible so if you look at only the #1s and not the rest of the chart it seems faster than it really was in the download age), and now that streaming has been included, it moves even slower. It seems to move at a similar pace to the Hot 100 now. :( When streaming was included? |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2016 11:23:24 GMT -5
I dont see Britney will take over #1. She is done. It's possible She pulled off two debuts at the top mainly powered by very strong sales There is a chance it can happen if she tops iTunes And by the looks of it, it might have a simultaneous release of the song and it's video in one day Plus after the BBMA's, she gotten hype from people again. she should at the very least be able to debut very high. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2016 11:26:30 GMT -5
I dont see Britney will take over #1. She is done. It's possible She pulled off two debuts at the top mainly powered by very strong sales There is a chance it can happen if she tops iTunes And by the looks of it, it might have a simultaneous release of the song and it's video in one day Plus after the BBMA's, she gotten hype from people again. she should at the very least be able to debut very high. well if it's anything like Pretty Girls quality-wise I can practically assure you it won't be #1 or even top 10. Hopefully that won't be the case though, I don't want a Pretty Girls v2...something closer to Hold It Against Me though, and then we're talking big money. Though it probably won't last long either even if it does get a high debut. Britney's peak days are definitely over :( |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2016 11:32:03 GMT -5
It's possible She pulled off two debuts at the top mainly powered by very strong sales There is a chance it can happen if she tops iTunes And by the looks of it, it might have a simultaneous release of the song and it's video in one day Plus after the BBMA's, she gotten hype from people again. she should at the very least be able to debut very high. well if it's anything like Pretty Girls quality-wise I can practically assure you it won't be #1 or even top 10. Hopefully that won't be the case though, I don't want a Pretty Girls v2...something closer to Hold It Against Me though, and then we're talking big money. Though it probably won't last long either even if it does get a high debut. Britney's peak days are definitely over :( You just gotta belieeeeeeeve But nah she can do it, if she nabbed 3 big hits in 2011 and could've had 1 in 2013 if her team actually put in some promotional efforts Also, from what I've heard from the song very far away from Pretty Girls, hopefully she never backtracks to that area again. Plus she also has G-Eazy on the song, should give it a good boost. Besides if Fergie can debut in the top 40, Britney can probably debut within the top 20. |
|
badrobot
3x Platinum Member
Joined: November 2006
Posts: 3,392
|
Post by badrobot on Jul 12, 2016 13:15:24 GMT -5
The Britney thing all depends on the song itself. Promo is definitely needed but it can't be relied on alone.
The number of times we talk about an artist as having a surefire #1 with their next single, it never seems to correlate with reality. I mean, nobody was saying months in advance that Zayn and Justin Timberlake would be guaranteed #1 debuts, and yet it happened. Meanwhile people talked about Ariana Grande and the last Britney single Pretty Girls as being #1 guaranteed and both underperformed.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2016 14:08:46 GMT -5
The Britney thing all depends on the song itself. Promo is definitely needed but it can't be relied on alone. The number of times we talk about an artist as having a surefire #1 with their next single, it never seems to correlate with reality. I mean, nobody was saying months in advance that Zayn and Justin Timberlake would be guaranteed #1 debuts, and yet it happened. Meanwhile people talked about Ariana Grande and the last Britney single Pretty Girls as being #1 guaranteed and both underperformed. to be fair (and correct me if I'm wrong), no one really knew about the JT song until like a couple days before it became available on iTunes. Personally I had a feeling the song would be huge when I first watched the video on YouTube the day it came out. |
|
popbox
3x Platinum Member
Dupe
Joined: January 2013
Posts: 3,493
|
Post by popbox on Jul 12, 2016 17:13:45 GMT -5
The Britney thing all depends on the song itself. Promo is definitely needed but it can't be relied on alone. The number of times we talk about an artist as having a surefire #1 with their next single, it never seems to correlate with reality. I mean, nobody was saying months in advance that Zayn and Justin Timberlake would be guaranteed #1 debuts, and yet it happened. Meanwhile people talked about Ariana Grande and the last Britney single Pretty Girls as being #1 guaranteed and both underperformed. Katy and Bruno are both guaranteed #1's with their leads unless their songs totally suck, or one of them blocks the other. Britney only has a shot if the song quality is great. |
|
badrobot
3x Platinum Member
Joined: November 2006
Posts: 3,392
|
Post by badrobot on Jul 12, 2016 19:24:45 GMT -5
I would like someone to collect the receipts from past threads for everytime somebody said a song they'd never heard yet was a guaranteed #1.
|
|
85la
3x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 3,916
|
Post by 85la on Jul 12, 2016 22:42:08 GMT -5
There's so many other possibilities too: Gaga, Ed Sheeran, Sam Smith, Lorde, Pink...
What about Taylor Swift? She's released an album every two years since her debut, so she's due now again. Unless it's been confirmed she won't release one this year?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2016 4:58:23 GMT -5
There's so many other possibilities too: Gaga, Ed Sheeran, Sam Smith, Lorde, Pink... What about Taylor Swift? She's released an album every two years since her debut, so she's due now again. Unless it's been confirmed she won't release one this year? Wow, it's already time for a new Taylor Swift album? It doesn't even feel like a long time since 1989 was everywhere. I'm hoping she waits a while. |
|
jenglisbe
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2005
Posts: 35,611
|
Post by jenglisbe on Jul 13, 2016 9:34:36 GMT -5
The singles from 1989 lasted a lot longer than past Swift albums in terms of mainstream success, so yeah this era lasted longer and I'd anticipate her having a longer delay before her next release.
|
|
jayhawk1117
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2013
Posts: 2,758
|
Post by jayhawk1117 on Jul 13, 2016 10:13:59 GMT -5
I would like someone to collect the receipts from past threads for everytime somebody said a song they'd never heard yet was a guaranteed #1. regardless of quality, it's still Katy Perry, it'll be huge. And Brunof has been number one with his debut singles for the last 2 albums have all been number plus his return with uptown funk have all been number one source it's more likely than not that those two are pretty good bets. |
|
