|
|
Post by Golden Bluebird on May 28, 2017 23:21:02 GMT -5
The only three Top 10 songs DJ Snake has had so far ("Turn Down for What," "Lean On," and "Let Me Love You") all peaked at #4.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2017 14:13:09 GMT -5
Gucci Mane - Both spent 22 weeks on Hot 100. All of its 22 weeks, it charted between 58 and 41. 58 was the lowest it was on its chart run and 41 was the highest it was on the chart run. Has there been a song that made year end list that had the most steady chart run its entire run?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2017 18:57:09 GMT -5
The longest reigning number one in the history of the h100 debuted at number one the week after the longest reigning number 2 in h100 history debuted at number 1
|
|
kacpe3
Gold Member
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 543 
|
Post by kacpe3 on Jun 9, 2017 10:18:21 GMT -5
Part Of Me by Katy Perry debuted at number 1 in 2012-03-03.
Next song to debut at number 1 was Harlem Shake by Baauer in 2013-03-02.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2017 9:49:28 GMT -5
Only 2 songs peaked at number 2 in 2011. Both of them had F**K in their name. F**K You and F**Kin Perfect.
|
|
iHype.
4x Platinum Member
Joined: October 2014
Posts: 4,714
|
Post by iHype. on Jun 14, 2017 5:08:35 GMT -5
Gucci Mane - Both spent 22 weeks on Hot 100. All of its 22 weeks, it charted between 58 and 41. 58 was the lowest it was on its chart run and 41 was the highest it was on the chart run. Has there been a song that made year end list that had the most steady chart run its entire run? Didn't make the year-end but Lionel Richie's "Just for You" charted for 17 weeks (4 months) at #92-99 throughout 2004! Chart run: 99-93-93-93-93-*92*-96-97-98-96-96-OFF-98-96-96-96-95-97 Such an awkward chart run. |
|
Harx
5x Platinum Member
Joined: August 2016
Posts: 5,049
|
Post by Harx on Jun 17, 2017 11:43:10 GMT -5
Robyn's "Do You Know (What It Takes)" was #29 on the 1997 year end Hot 100. The follow-up single that was "Show Me Love" was #29 on the 1998 year end Hot 100. And both songs peaked at #7!
|
|
|
|
Post by Leaf on Jun 17, 2017 11:59:23 GMT -5
Going by official singles only and not promotional singles (according to Wikipedia), Nine Inch Nails had four #11-peaking songs in a row followed by four #1-peaking songs in a row on Alternative.
|
|
85la
3x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 3,916
|
Post by 85la on Jun 19, 2017 15:27:02 GMT -5
Exactly 4 and 5 years ago this chart week, two songs rose to #1 and would end up being the songs of the Summer for their respective years, Blurred Lines in 2013 (chart dated June 22, 2013), and Call Me Maybe in 2012 (chart dated June 23, 2012).
|
|
GPMB
Gold Member
Joined: December 2016
Posts: 618
|
Post by GPMB on Jun 24, 2017 16:29:07 GMT -5
Not really a coincidence, but just an utterly shocking and unbelievable fact to me: Lose Yourself, despite spending 12 weeks at #1, only spent 23 weeks on the Hot 100. And people said Black Beatles/Hello/One Sweet Day had short chart runs for a #1 song.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2017 17:15:48 GMT -5
Not really a coincidence, but just an utterly shocking and unbelievable fact to me: Lose Yourself, despite spending 12 weeks at #1, only spent 23 weeks on the Hot 100. And people said Black Beatles/Hello/One Sweet Day had short chart runs for a #1 song. What's much more unbelievable to me is that how come Lose Yourself has sold 6 million+ digital copies even it's released and charted years before 2005. I mean, the 6 million+ copies itself is almost gonna land itself on decade-end chart but that's after its entire chart run. Did it not reenter or go recurrent at all because billboard rule couldn't let it? That really sucks for this song, even tho I don't like this song at all |
|
|
|
Post by Leaf on Jun 24, 2017 17:34:04 GMT -5
Not really a coincidence, but just an utterly shocking and unbelievable fact to me: Lose Yourself, despite spending 12 weeks at #1, only spent 23 weeks on the Hot 100. And people said Black Beatles/Hello/One Sweet Day had short chart runs for a #1 song. It fell pretty hard too: 43-18-9-6-2-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-9-15-23-29-34-43 |
|
|
|
Post by Baby Yoda Hot100Fan on Jun 24, 2017 21:29:56 GMT -5
Not really a coincidence, but just an utterly shocking and unbelievable fact to me: Lose Yourself, despite spending 12 weeks at #1, only spent 23 weeks on the Hot 100. And people said Black Beatles/Hello/One Sweet Day had short chart runs for a #1 song. What's much more unbelievable to me is that how come Lose Yourself has sold 6 million+ digital copies even it's released and charted years before 2005. I mean, the 6 million+ copies itself is almost gonna land itself on decade-end chart but that's after its entire chart run. Did it not reenter or go recurrent at all because billboard rule couldn't let it? That really sucks for this song, even tho I don't like this song at all My theory is that much of the sales mentioned happened during the early part (ie. it was front-loaded) of its chart run. It did manage to be #28 in the 2000s decade-end chart, which is probably lower than you'd expect for a song with 12 weeks at #1, but that's a result of its chart run. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2017 23:40:24 GMT -5
What's much more unbelievable to me is that how come Lose Yourself has sold 6 million+ digital copies even it's released and charted years before 2005. I mean, the 6 million+ copies itself is almost gonna land itself on decade-end chart but that's after its entire chart run. Did it not reenter or go recurrent at all because billboard rule couldn't let it? That really sucks for this song, even tho I don't like this song at all My theory is that much of the sales mentioned happened during the early part (ie. it was front-loaded) of its chart run. It did manage to be #28 in the 2000s decade-end chart, which is probably lower than you'd expect for a song with 12 weeks at #1, but that's a result of its chart run. Digital songs chart was launched and incorporated as a part of billboard hot 100 in 2005. Lose Yourself was released in 2002. It makes sense that a song could sell 6 million digital copies a week back then. Because theory, even a crappy one, makes miracles. No it doesn't!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
85la
3x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 3,916
|
Post by 85la on Jun 25, 2017 2:49:26 GMT -5
^ Yeah, not only did digital sales not count towards the Hot 100 back then, but the iTunes store didn't even exist until late 2003 (I"m not aware of any other digital sales outlets that started earlier, but even if there were, the numbers must have been miniscule). A lot of rap songs back then, and especially Eminem it seems, had fairly swift descents after their peaks because points were mainly from radio, and they didn't have sustained play from AC and other formats. Even so, songs like that could go on to be classics and accrue a lot of interest and sales further down the line. And no, Billboard rules since then have not allowed it to reenter.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2017 8:19:25 GMT -5
Number one for 12 weeks and then drops to number 9? What the actual fuck?
|
|
fhas
3x Platinum Member
Three-time World Champions: 1992 - 2-1 vs. Barcelona, 1993 - 3-2 vs. Milan, 2005 - 1-0 vs. Liverpool
|
Post by fhas on Jun 25, 2017 10:59:04 GMT -5
Also, from that same era, Work It fell from #2 to #15 in just two weeks and barely made the decade-end chart despite being the song that spent most weeks at #2 in the 2000s.
2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-6-15
|
|
85la
3x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 3,916
|
Post by 85la on Jun 25, 2017 14:12:12 GMT -5
^ Hmm, there must have been some formula change or major shake-up then.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2017 14:20:40 GMT -5
It doesn't make any sense with lose yourself though. How is it even possible to lose that many points in a week after spending 12 on top? A formula change?
|
|
|
|
Post by Golden Bluebird on Jun 25, 2017 14:27:28 GMT -5
There's also "Maria Maria" by Santana featuring The Product G&B, which fell to #8 after 10 weeks at #1 then to 15-19-21-26-36-48-47.
|
|
85la
3x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 3,916
|
Post by 85la on Jun 25, 2017 14:42:00 GMT -5
There are other songs that have made similar large drops from #1. It doesn't happen very often but it happens. As the title of this thread goes, it might just be a coincidence of a certain set of circumstances where the song already has a low point total for a #1 and the songs below it are close by in points, and the #1 loses enough points to fall below a few songs while another couple songs gain enough points to rise above it.
But yes, a 1-9 drop seems pretty extreme even for this scenario, which goes back to my other point that there might have been a formula change that week.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2017 16:18:04 GMT -5
Lose Yourself lost 22 million impressions when it fell 1-9, while a bunch of songs like Cry Me A River and I'm With You passed it by gaining only 11 and 7 million.
|
|
fhas
3x Platinum Member
Three-time World Champions: 1992 - 2-1 vs. Barcelona, 1993 - 3-2 vs. Milan, 2005 - 1-0 vs. Liverpool
|
Post by fhas on Jun 25, 2017 16:36:32 GMT -5
Apologize by Timbaland feat. One Republic was #10 on the decade-end Hot 100, Hot 100 Airplay (Radio Songs) and Digital Sales.
|
|
GPMB
Gold Member
Joined: December 2016
Posts: 618
|
Post by GPMB on Jun 30, 2017 15:33:20 GMT -5
Fill Me In by Craig David spent 20 weeks in the top 20 in 2001 despite only peaking at #15... and somehow only ended up at #37 on the 2001 YE, in a pretty weak chart year for that matter. ???
|
|
|
|
Post by Golden Bluebird on Jul 19, 2017 11:47:58 GMT -5
Two of the biggest hits of the year are both sex songs that have one line using magnets as a love metaphor.
Shape of You: "We push and pull like a magnet do"
Despacito: "Tú eres el imán y yo soy el metal" (You are the magnet and I am the metal)
|
|
Harx
5x Platinum Member
Joined: August 2016
Posts: 5,049
|
Post by Harx on Jul 20, 2017 5:36:18 GMT -5
Two of the biggest hits of the year are both sex songs that have one line using magnets as a love metaphor. Shape of You: "We push and pull like a magnet do" Despacito: " Tú eres el imán y yo soy el metal" (You are the magnet and I am the metal) This is from Todd In The Shadows... |
|
|
|
Post by Golden Bluebird on Jul 20, 2017 10:36:43 GMT -5
Two of the biggest hits of the year are both sex songs that have one line using magnets as a love metaphor. Shape of You: "We push and pull like a magnet do" Despacito: " Tú eres el imán y yo soy el metal" (You are the magnet and I am the metal) This is from Todd In The Shadows... Yeah. That's how I learned about it. |
|
frenchfry
Gold Member
Joined: August 2014
Posts: 564
|
Post by frenchfry on Jul 21, 2017 9:26:05 GMT -5
Redbone, which is currently number 14 on the main billboard hot 100 chart, is number 14 on the airplay, digital, and streaming charts.
I know this is the same scenario for Despacito, as well as other previous number ones, but I rarely find this pattern found in non-number ones hits.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2017 11:57:23 GMT -5
Fabolouses songs from 2003 were right next to each other in the Year End, 24 and 23, Cant Let You Go and Into You. Both of those songs also peaked at 4.
|
|
Harx
5x Platinum Member
Joined: August 2016
Posts: 5,049
|
Post by Harx on Jul 28, 2017 1:28:10 GMT -5
On the 1985 year end Hot 100 chart, songs "Loverboy" and "Lovergirl" are back to back at #28 and #29.
On the 2015 year end Hot 100, songs by iLoveMemphis and iLoveMakonnen are back to back at #82 and #83.
|
|
