|
|
Post by af18c on Mar 1, 2004 16:31:35 GMT -5
Is the release of "Take My Breath Away" costing "With You" weeks at number one?
I think if they held off the release of TMBA, With You would still have it's bullet would probally spend an extra week beating out Britney for #1.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adonis the DemiGod! on Mar 1, 2004 16:32:54 GMT -5
Once you get to #1 there's not really much point in keeping it there for umteen weeks in a row. It just makes people sick of the artist and the song.
|
|
Crushcrushchris
5x Platinum Member
Default
Joined: November 2003
Posts: 5,131
|
Post by Crushcrushchris on Mar 1, 2004 16:33:59 GMT -5
Is the release of "Take My Breath Away" costing "With You" weeks at number one?
I think if they held off the release of TMBA, With You would still have it's bullet would probally spend an extra week beating out Britney for #1. Yes, but that's not going to stop the label from saying that With You is/was the #1 song in the country. I don't think it was all that great an idea, but meh. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2004 16:35:21 GMT -5
Once you get to #1 there's not really much point in keeping it there for umteen weeks in a row. It just makes people sick of the artist and the song. Exactly. |
|
Matt4319
Administrator
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 15,215
Staff
|
Post by Matt4319 on Mar 1, 2004 16:38:56 GMT -5
"With You" has already been called a #1 single, on VH1's "Best Week Ever".
|
|
|
|
Post by RRMusicGuy on Mar 1, 2004 18:18:36 GMT -5
Once you get to #1 there's not really much point in keeping it there for umteen weeks in a row. It just makes people sick of the artist and the song. Exactly squared. And, at 8500 spins you are approaching the point of radio over-saturation. |
|
j
4x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 4,975 
|
Post by j on Mar 1, 2004 18:38:31 GMT -5
I agree with Adonis.
And "costing"?
|
|
|
|
Post by af18c on Mar 1, 2004 18:40:43 GMT -5
|
|
Pet Shop Boy
3x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 3,252
|
Post by Pet Shop Boy on Mar 2, 2004 11:50:31 GMT -5
It's probably a good idea, if it takes off it'll keep the album selling, cos tere'll coem a point when people who want it for 'With You' will already have it.
It MAY cost her a top ten on the hot 100 though, which would have been a nice achievement.
|
|
|
|
Post by pkwi on Mar 7, 2004 16:24:58 GMT -5
I agree, I think that they should have held off on its release.
|
|
|
|
Post by kamikaze on Mar 7, 2004 17:26:21 GMT -5
Without a commercial single or significant play on other formats, it couldn't have reached the top 10 on Billboard anyway.
|
|
Gorminako
3x Platinum Member
Joined: October 2003
Posts: 3,596
|
Post by Gorminako on Mar 11, 2004 2:17:40 GMT -5
"With You" was lucky to get into the Top 10, let alone #1, and it wouldn't have stayed there any longer with or without the release of the pathetic cover of "Take My Breath Away".
|
|
