Wolfy
5x Platinum Member
She Wolf
Joined: December 2004
Posts: 5,986
|
Post by Wolfy on Mar 16, 2014 19:47:59 GMT -5
Are we ever going to get to see the video from Hearst castle? It seems she's moved on to artpop2. Music video on Saturday. Presumably what was recorded there. I'm confused. I thought that the hearst castle video was for GUY, a single off artpop. Supposedly, at least it seems, that the 3/22 video is for a new song from artpop2. It sounds like we are talking about two different singles. One for artpop 1 (GUY) and one for artpop 2 (new song). Usually when the video is shot outside people know what single its for because the song is played on the set. If the media picked up that its for GUY it likely is. It looks like the media was on the set: www.ksbw.com/news/central-california/Lady-Gaga-at-Hearst-Castle-filming-music-video/24476214
|
|
|
Post by josh on Mar 16, 2014 19:48:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by josh on Mar 16, 2014 19:49:26 GMT -5
Music video on Saturday. Presumably what was recorded there. I'm confused. I thought that the hearst castle video was for GUY, a single off artpop. Supposedly, at least it seems, that the 3/22 video is for a new song from artpop2. It sounds like we are talking about two different singles. One for artpop 1 (GUY) and one for artpop 2 (new song). Usually when the video is shot outside people know what single its for because the song is played on the set. If the media picked up that its for GUY it likely is. We don't know what the music video is for. We also don't know what the Hearst Castle video was for. But at least we have a date for a video so that's something.
|
|
|
Post by Devil Marlena Nylund on Mar 16, 2014 19:50:46 GMT -5
Everything is speculation except for the fact there's a video out on March 22 (though I would argue that even that isn't indicative that there will be) and that Gaga has recorded music for an "artpop part 2" album that isn't even necessarily going to be released soon or ever.
|
|
dzjx
Gold Member
Joined: August 2011
Posts: 933
|
Post by dzjx on Mar 16, 2014 19:54:36 GMT -5
Yeah at sxsw she basically confirmed there is no part 2 coming out any time soon or if at all, so im not sure why its in the title?
|
|
|
Post by die Lotterie on Mar 16, 2014 20:20:03 GMT -5
Yeah at sxsw she basically confirmed there is no part 2 coming out any time soon or if at all, so im not sure why its in the title? What exactly did she say?
|
|
|
Post by Love Plastic Love on Mar 16, 2014 20:23:20 GMT -5
Edit-Ok the quote does say Artpop 2 is finished, but that "maybe one day I'll release it" which sounds a lot less promising lol. So weird to see how it changed though-back in November she said that she might release it before the tour started. But yeah we have no idea what she was filming at the Castle-we heard GUY and Venus in previews so it could be one or the other or both or those were just "tricks" and the real song is something completely different.
|
|
|
Post by die Lotterie on Mar 16, 2014 20:30:49 GMT -5
I would love the video to be for a new song with clips or intros and outros of "Venus" and "G.U.Y." intertwined.
|
|
dzjx
Gold Member
Joined: August 2011
Posts: 933
|
Post by dzjx on Mar 16, 2014 21:10:55 GMT -5
Yeah at sxsw she basically confirmed there is no part 2 coming out any time soon or if at all, so im not sure why its in the title? What exactly did she say? I dont know what minute but its in there, she said there basically was a lot of leftover songs from the recording of artpop and that she just likes to play them for her and her friends and it wont necessarily be released
|
|
Tea-why
3x Platinum Member
Joined: March 2008
Posts: 3,624
|
Post by Tea-why on Mar 16, 2014 21:22:42 GMT -5
I'm liking her hair.
|
|
|
Post by Ezekiel 23:20β21 on Mar 16, 2014 22:08:35 GMT -5
I'm guessing that vomit artist from the SXSW performance Millie Brown made that.
|
|
|
Post by ListenToItTwice on Mar 17, 2014 7:25:53 GMT -5
Vomit painting by Millie Brown.
|
|
popbox
3x Platinum Member
Dupe
Joined: January 2013
Posts: 3,493
|
Post by popbox on Mar 17, 2014 13:04:29 GMT -5
I would love the video to be for a new song with clips or intros and outros of "Venus" and "G.U.Y." intertwined. This sounds ideal to me, and for that reason it won't be what happens. :(
|
|
Safado
2x Platinum Member
Joined: November 2005
Posts: 2,802
|
Post by Safado on Mar 17, 2014 15:53:45 GMT -5
Grain of salt, if this hasn't been posted. www.popmusicgadfly.com/2014/03/15/exclusive-details-gaga-unreleased-music-porn-video-r-kelly/This is one of the more innocent parts of the video. This is one of the more innocent parts of the video. I was all set to write an article about the unreleased (there is a reason for that) βDo What U Wantβ video a couple days back, but didnβt quite believe the source. However, I am now able to very confidently believe what my source alleged this video contains: If this alleged video ever gets released, it will certainly ruin whatβs left of Gagaβs career. Even without R. Kelly, the alleged video is still nasty. I would love to have been a fly on the wall when Interscope executives saw the part where R. Kelly allegedly pretends to piss ARTPOP BBQ sauce on Gagaβs stomach, then licks it up. I can only assume Gaga didnβt know R. Kellyβs history of peeing on underaged teenagers. In any case, the video is allegedly visually interesting with simple, but appealing backgrounds: one is pure white, one has a Star Wars theme, one has a digital theme, and then there is one with a rainbow. The colors allegedly look like they are coming at you in 3D, but they donβt take away from the main visuals. I wish they did. The video allegedly starts off with (yet) another Madonna homage: Lady Gaga is dressed up in an America flag outfit, just like Madonnaβs 1990 Rock The Vote commercial. As the music fades in, both R. Kelly and Terry Richardson (!) are slapping Gagaβs (rather tight) buttocks. Then, as Terry leaves the scene, Lady Gaga allegedly takes off the outfit and reveals black lingerie. She looks quite good, I must admit. Itβs obvious she has been working out a lot. At first, there is some relatively (when compared to the rest of the video) innocent role playing. It is very similar to Madonnaβs (again) Human Nature video as R. Kelly allegedly tries to dominate Gaga, but she keeps getting away. At one point, she pushes him down. When he gets back up, thatβs where the action begins. R. Kelly can allegedly be seen humping Gaga from in front, grinding her from behind (while spanking her) and even simulating eating her out. Gaga seems to control all of this and her main point in the video is that she is the one in control of all the shots, sexually or not. Gaga allegedly goes under his legs and lies on the floor. Then, we see what is possibly the most disturbing scene ever in a music video. R. Kelly allegedly pulls out a tube of βARTPOPβ BBQ sauce that he slowly moves between his legs to represent a penis. Then, he squirts it all out on Lady Gaga, as if he is having an orgasm. Lady Gaga allegedly rubs the BBQ sauce all over her body and even licks it with her fingers. R. Kelly then bends down and proceeds to lick the BBQ sauce. Suddenly, we allegedly see Lady Gaga dressed as an old and fat Lady lying on a rainbow-colored bed to imply that it was all a dream. She then looks at her finger and sees some of the BBQ sauce that was spilled on her during the dream. She looks at the camera, screams, and the video ends.
|
|
Carlitoz
2x Platinum Member
Joined: October 2003
Posts: 2,691
|
Post by Carlitoz on Mar 17, 2014 16:18:22 GMT -5
I had said a few weeks ago that it had to be something as bad as that that didn't allow the video to surface. I don't see any other reason why they would've not released the video. The weird part is that a couple of months ago Gaga said everything was fine with her label. After all the stuff she said at sxsw, of course we know that was not the case. I wonder if sooner or later this will leak. Of course if it's true.... Maybe it's just crap somebody made up. Somebody who was thinking in a similar theory to mine only that went an extra step further and made up a story.
|
|
Lozzy
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2010
Posts: 49,237
|
Post by Lozzy on Mar 17, 2014 16:24:26 GMT -5
That... actually feels believable.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2014 16:31:34 GMT -5
I don't really buy it since every other word in the article is "allegedly" but the author claims to have seen the video.
|
|
|
Post by when the pawn... on Mar 17, 2014 16:39:22 GMT -5
I hope it isn't true. The sketchiest part is that they say it's BBQ Sauce, which makes it sound like the author ran with the BBQ-theme of her Austin performance. The description is pretty detailed though, regarding the 3 background themes, etc.
WOW if that's true. But even considering the "antics" throughout her career, that doesn't seem like something Gaga would do.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Mar 17, 2014 16:46:48 GMT -5
hi I don't buy this though, why would she do that. Either way, hopefully we'll never find it out.
|
|
|
Post by Love Plastic Love on Mar 17, 2014 16:48:32 GMT -5
Please keep in mind this is Angela Cheng, the same person outed as a liar from examiner, who is now posting under similar shady sites since everyone stopped believing sources from the examiner. So, I would take it with a huge grain of salt with two disclaimers-1. I strongly suspect that "Angela Cheng" (who is fake-she does not exist and none of her pictures are real) is at least associated with Perez if not Perez himself so as sickening as that is he does occasionally have inside information and sources that are real mixed in with the lies and bullshit and 2. Gaga got so far off track at the end of last year that that actually sounds believable to me.
|
|
|
Post by Devil Marlena Nylund on Mar 17, 2014 16:52:12 GMT -5
Wasn't that article already posted? Maybe it was in random thoughts. It sounds like the writing of that Examiner chick and I'm sure a quick background check will lead it to them somehow. Besides why would this one person have a screening of the video and no one else would without writing about it? I don't believe it for a second. I don't see any other reason why they would've not released the video. Really?
|
|
|
Post by when the pawn... on Mar 17, 2014 16:56:06 GMT -5
I just looked at the site again. There are links on the right to articles on other pop stars. 1 for Miley, 1 for BeyoncΓ©, 3 for Katy Perry...14 for Lady Gaga...all bashing her. It's fake. TBH, I kinda believed it but this website looks like it's 75% dedicated to tearing her down.
|
|
|
Post by Ezekiel 23:20β21 on Mar 17, 2014 17:00:28 GMT -5
Given the growing backlash against R. Kelly as the prior misdeeds were brought up again and now the new issues surrounding Terry Richardson with even more models coming forward about sexual misconduct and other deviant behavior, and coupled with the possibility that the video not turning out as good as they wanted, or it was too scandalous, it makes sense why it didn't get released. It was detrimental to the single's further success, though it did do quite well all things considered.
|
|
Carlitoz
2x Platinum Member
Joined: October 2003
Posts: 2,691
|
Post by Carlitoz on Mar 17, 2014 17:04:05 GMT -5
Wasn't that article already posted? Maybe it was in random thoughts. It sounds like the writing of that Examiner chick and I'm sure a quick background check will lead it to them somehow. Besides why would this one person have a screening of the video and no one else would without writing about it? I don't believe it for a second. I don't see any other reason why they would've not released the video. Really? Yep, really. Not meaning that it has to be exactly the description put there, but the mix of the lyrics in the chorus (do what you want with my body), having R. Kelly and his reputation (sex assault and pedophilia) plus having a controversial video. That's more what I mean. You have a hit song growing on radio, the video is ready, you must promote the album that's not doing that well, but you don't release it. I can guess that the label told her to edit it significantly and Gaga didn't want to. For sure it's not that the executives didn't like Gaga's choice of wig. I was always thinking it had to be something more controversial in the content of the video for the big executives says definitely NO. That's only my take and couldn't come up with a better reason why the video was shelved. That doesn't mean there wasn't a better reason though.
|
|
|
Post by Love Plastic Love on Mar 17, 2014 18:21:44 GMT -5
I actually agree with Carliotz-They were ready to release the video (and we had stills and there was a date-so it was done or close to it) and then something happened. I think that something was that someone pulled the plug realizing how distasteful it would be or how it would get the wrong type of attention. I am personally having issues coming up with other reasons to pull it unless Terry or R. Kelly had some sort of reason to suddenly pull the plug and also somehow got Gaga to be very quiet about it. BTW the stage looks EPIC Not as immediately visually appealing as the BTW stage, but it apparently is made of lucite so it is completely see-through and you can walk under all the see-through catwalks. I bet the actual stage part will look cool too when the lights are shining through it.
|
|
|
Post by Devil Marlena Nylund on Mar 17, 2014 18:38:16 GMT -5
Wasn't that article already posted? Maybe it was in random thoughts. It sounds like the writing of that Examiner chick and I'm sure a quick background check will lead it to them somehow. Besides why would this one person have a screening of the video and no one else would without writing about it? I don't believe it for a second. Really? Yep, really. Not meaning that it has to be exactly the description put there, but the mix of the lyrics in the chorus (do what you want with my body), having R. Kelly and his reputation (sex assault and pedophilia) plus having a controversial video. That's more what I mean. You have a hit song growing on radio, the video is ready, you must promote the album that's not doing that well, but you don't release it. I can guess that the label told her to edit it significantly and Gaga didn't want to. For sure it's not that the executives didn't like Gaga's choice of wig. I was always thinking it had to be something more controversial in the content of the video for the big executives says definitely NO. That's only my take and couldn't come up with a better reason why the video was shelved. That doesn't mean there wasn't a better reason though. I didn't mean to sound so harsh with my "really?" from the last post so I apologize if it did. I think there was a lot of behind the scenes stuff regarding the video and I doubt it had much to do with the content itself but if it did, I doubt it was due to the description of the article above. But I guess it's something we might never know but it might leak someday. The stage looks exciting! Plenty of opportunity to be close to her!
|
|
dzjx
Gold Member
Joined: August 2011
Posts: 933
|
Post by dzjx on Mar 17, 2014 19:08:58 GMT -5
The reason I think it is fake, the person describes a scene, and then says they can only wish the effects took away from the main visuals. - they speak as though they have seen it/been disturbed by it. But they say they have not seen it.
|
|
|
Post by Devil Marlena Nylund on Mar 17, 2014 19:13:01 GMT -5
And the author, Queen Angela, writes only negative articles about Gaga, like the Examiner person (whose "photo" is above) and a google search links to a bunch of posts on various boards talking about it and its reputation as a troll.
|
|
|
Post by Devil Marlena Nylund on Mar 18, 2014 6:24:33 GMT -5
I bet the video is for her song on the Muppets soundtrack with Tony Bennett. Has there been any sign of Tony or a Muppet on set at the castle?
|
|
|
Post by josh on Mar 18, 2014 8:11:20 GMT -5
|
|