|
Post by 43dudleyvillas on Feb 26, 2016 23:04:41 GMT -5
Let me propose a theory as to why Capitol planned a "Break on Me" push for this week and we'll see if it pans out soon enough. My theory: Keith is going to launch his next single with an Idol performance, and that performance is scheduled for two Thursdays from now. He can't just change the date of the performance (because the show fills up its performance slots well in advance), and perhaps Stoney Creek had already grabbed next week as Randy Houser's push week. So that meant a ridiculous push for "Break on Me" this week to snatch a #1 from its more natural holder.
As much as I love Keith's voice, I haven't been able to work up an interest in this song, and the manufactured nature of its gains this week is making me root against it (to no avail, obviously).
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2016 1:13:58 GMT -5
Let me propose a theory as to why Capitol planned a "Break on Me" push for this week and we'll see if it pans out soon enough. My theory: Keith is going to launch his next single with an Idol performance, and that performance is scheduled for two Thursdays from now. He can't just change the date of the performance (because the show fills up its performance slots well in advance), and perhaps Stoney Creek had already grabbed next week as Randy Houser's push week. So that meant a ridiculous push for "Break on Me" this week to snatch a #1 from its more natural holder. That's a good theory. Just so I understand you correctly: you're guessing Thursday, March 10, for a KU performance on Idol? If that is indeed the case, and if Stoney Creek had already "claimed" the first week of March for their push week, then I can certainly understand why Capitol decided to gun it this week. The one thing I still don't understand, though, is why they allowed Carrie to widen her lead so much last week. Anyway, as you'd expect, getting to #1 on Mediabase wasn't much of a challenge for Capitol, but obtaining the Billboard #1 this week is certainly proving to be a challenge (of course, that's assuming that they'll keep the push going through Sunday...who knows, maybe they'll be content with a Mediabase-only #1). I had been assuming that Capitol would go for #1 after Carrie had peaked and that they deliberately slowed BOM down a bit last week to allow Carrie some space...and perhaps they did allow BOM to level off a bit, but only because they thought radio would be more willing to give it extra extra spins this week. We'll probably never know for sure..
|
|
onebuffalo
Diamond Member
#LiteralLegender
I am One Buffalo.
Joined: June 2009
Posts: 26,592
|
Post by onebuffalo on Feb 27, 2016 10:00:47 GMT -5
Can someone say ridiculous?:
6 1 KEITH URBAN Break On Me 8121 7094 1027 57.015
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2016 10:10:18 GMT -5
Can someone say ridiculous?: 6 1 KEITH URBAN Break On Me 8121 7094 1027 57.015 I sure can't say ridiculous but Haley Georgia sure can (who can forget this monstrosity) m.youtube.com/watch?v=nhnFCMyM7eEYes I am bringing this back. Why, because I feel like it.
|
|
Marv
6x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2004
Posts: 6,308
|
Post by Marv on Feb 27, 2016 11:15:04 GMT -5
Ridiculous would be a perfect G-rated description of this stunt---yet ANOTHER reason to despise Scott Borchetta going back to the sudden surge of 'Somebody' to #1 @ Billboard in 2004 which he executed and used even more with Taylor Swift.
|
|
bboat11
Moderator
Pulse's Resident Martina McBride Expert
Joined: February 2013
Posts: 27,251
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Staff
|
Post by bboat11 on Feb 27, 2016 11:15:57 GMT -5
Can someone say ridiculous?: 6 1 KEITH URBAN Break On Me 8121 7094 1027 57.015 I sure can't say ridiculous but Haley Georgia sure can (who can forget this monstrosity) m.youtube.com/watch?v=nhnFCMyM7eEYes I am bringing this back. Why, because I feel like it. Actually I don't really think she can either. She kinda stutters a bit every time she tries to say it ;) As far as this song's monstrous push goes, I am definitely perplexed that it is happening right now, but I am just as perplexed that Sony seems to be sitting back and allowing it to happen. They had like a 99% guarantee of hitting the top this week as long as they didn't just sit there twiddling their thumbs, so what do they do? Sit back and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory... Of course, I am not upset about it, I am just perplexed. Carrie still has a lot of potential for a multi-week #1 starting next week, which I am thrilled to see! As long as Sony doesn't decide to sit on their collective rumps and allow Randy Houser to have a huge push to #1 next week........
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2016 15:31:16 GMT -5
Ridiculous would be a perfect G-rated description of this stunt---yet ANOTHER reason to despise Scott Borchetta going back to the sudden surge of 'Somebody' to #1 @ Billboard in 2004 which he executed and used even more with Taylor Swift. Borchetta might have started the trend, but radio is just as much to blame, if not more so at fault. They don't have to give in to any label's request for max spins. When I joined Pulse almost 6 years ago, the consensus was that radio would get annoyed when labels tried to pull off a big #1 push. Now these ridiculous #1 pushes happen almost every week (although I agree that the push for BOM has been extra excessive), and radio seems to enjoy the fact that they get to be the ones to hand out a #1 to a different artist/label combo every week. Spread the wealth!! Everybody gets a trophy! There should be 52 unique #1 hits in a year.
|
|
sabre14
Diamond Member
Vince Gill & the Muppets make everything better
Joined: October 2013
Posts: 26,916
|
Post by sabre14 on Feb 27, 2016 15:36:34 GMT -5
Ridiculous would be a perfect G-rated description of this stunt---yet ANOTHER reason to despise Scott Borchetta going back to the sudden surge of 'Somebody' to #1 @ Billboard in 2004 which he executed and used even more with Taylor Swift. Borchetta might have started the trend, but radio is just as much to blame, if not more so at fault. They don't have to give in to any label's request for max spins. When I joined Pulse almost 6 years ago, the consensus was that radio would get annoyed when labels tried to pull off a big #1 push. Now these ridiculous #1 pushes happen almost every week (although I agree that the push for BOM has been extra excessive), and radio seems to enjoy the fact that they get to be the ones to give a trophy (#1) to a new artist/label combo every week. It's really just self-indulgence on radio's part. They love the fact they get to pat themselves on the back when it comes to helping these #1 pushes come to fruition. I also think the longer we go, the more easy and second-nature this becomes. I mean, at some point radio stations don't even think twice about giving labels the overnight spins and such because that's just what you do when labels make it known they're pushing for #1. The way of thinking would need to be changed for this to stop, or at least be curbed down considerably.
|
|
Zazie
5x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 5,144
|
Post by Zazie on Feb 27, 2016 17:42:55 GMT -5
^ Second nature, exactly. In the 15 years before the 1990 introduction of electronic tabulation of spins, country radio was content to allow radio stations to self-report self-evidently false weekly spin totals as the basis of the weekly charts. 48, 49, maybe there was a year with 50 #1 songs back then. All the songs marched up one position per week, hit #1 for their token appearance, and then fell abruptly out of the top 10. (Bless the Christmas week -- because there was no chart published then, somebody had to get a 2-week #1.)
There were occasional exceptions, but at the rate of about one song a year. And what we see now isn't quite as bad as it was back then, but I am only pointing out that if we have to wait until radio stations are ashamed of themselves for things to change, we could be waiting a very, very long time.
|
|
Marv
6x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2004
Posts: 6,308
|
Post by Marv on Feb 27, 2016 19:57:19 GMT -5
I feel the same way, so for me the ability to listen to stations which aren't slaves to the CT 40 chart is wonderful, since I still like hearing the artists who constitutes the format's 'dominant dozen' (Tim, Alan Kenny, Clint, Martina, Lorrie, Trisha Garth, Toby, B & D ànd a few others) who helped power country radio to #1 in listeners in the early 90s combined with the self-inflicte demise of top 40 radio at the same time.
Thank goodness for Texas country powerhouse stations such as KBBQ, KPLX, & KCYY and Nashville's WSM-FM.
I'm delighted that Keith made it to #1 with this even if the method turns my stomach with disgust.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2016 20:00:22 GMT -5
Oh by the way CCUSA played the studio version of "Break On Me". Just an FYI
|
|
|
Post by myeverything on Feb 27, 2016 20:29:27 GMT -5
So does that mean that a second spin on the countdown show won't be counted?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2016 20:35:22 GMT -5
So does that mean that a second spin on the countdown show won't be counted? Quite the opposite Keith Urban got an extra spin so he has even more of a chance at the BB #1
|
|
justme60
New Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 499
|
Post by justme60 on Feb 27, 2016 20:51:40 GMT -5
Quite the opposite Keith Urban got an extra spin so he has even more of a chance at the BB #1 And this makes me so happy and it's about time...he deserves it! He's always pretty well stood back while others jumped over him, so I'm hoping he does get to have a BB #1.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2016 21:09:09 GMT -5
Quite the opposite Keith Urban got an extra spin so he has even more of a chance at the BB #1 And this makes me so happy and it's about time...he deserves it! He's always pretty well stood back while others jumped over him, so I'm hoping he does get to have a BB #1. Does he really deserve it if it's blatant chart manipulation. What Capital is pulling off is just astonishing and annoying.
|
|
sabre14
Diamond Member
Vince Gill & the Muppets make everything better
Joined: October 2013
Posts: 26,916
|
Post by sabre14 on Feb 28, 2016 12:20:44 GMT -5
"Break On Me" gained 1171 spins and 6.6 million in audience this week (a whopping 238 spins and 1.5 million in audience gained today) while "Heartbeat" gained 400 spins and 3.0 million in audience. Keith is #1 on Mediabase this week and I can guarantee he'll be #1 on Billboard if they have decided to push through today. Keith's update needs to be bad enough tomorrow for Carrie to take Billboard. Again, I'm sure Sony and UMG are very aware of each other's intentions.
|
|
justme60
New Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 499
|
Post by justme60 on Feb 28, 2016 14:07:13 GMT -5
Does he really deserve it if it's blatant chart manipulation. What Capital is pulling off is just astonishing and annoying.
You act as though this is the first time any artist/label has had this happen! It seems it's beginning to be the norm. Chesney's last song was the same way.
So as a fan of Keith's, yes, I'm glad he might get the BB#1. I personally think he deserves it.
The two labels may have planned it this way.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2016 14:16:38 GMT -5
Does he really deserve it if it's blatant chart manipulation. What Capital is pulling off is just astonishing and annoying.You act as though this is the first time any artist/label has had this happen! It seems it's beginning to be the norm. Chesney's last song was the same way. So as a fan of Keith's, yes, I'm glad he might get the BB#1. I personally think he deserves it. The two labels may have planned it this way. Well there is no way we will ever know if the labels planned this. I guess like for me, if I was a fan of which I am of lets say Carrie Underwood. I would be just as annoyed if Sont did something like that, but hey everyone's different. There is a difference between pushing a song and then there is just straight up going all in. I also know it's the norm now, still I despise when labels do that. It's radio and chart manipulation and nothing ever changes.
|
|
Zazie
5x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 5,144
|
Post by Zazie on Feb 29, 2016 8:52:44 GMT -5
Another huge day for the newest fake-spin king. So he'll get the #1 on BB by a fairly big margin. Sorry to see KU go down this path, but I do understand that this won't hurt his reputation at all in the business -- it's only the chart followers who worry about unimportant details such as the integrity of the charts.
And by any standard, KU's a good man and a kind one. It's hard to expect him to insist that his label back down from the 6-1 craziness. He's got to let them go ahead, I suppose.
This is his 19th Billboard #1. I'll try to keep my enthusiasm under control.
|
|
|
Post by 43dudleyvillas on Feb 29, 2016 9:22:48 GMT -5
Let me propose a theory as to why Capitol planned a "Break on Me" push for this week and we'll see if it pans out soon enough. My theory: Keith is going to launch his next single with an Idol performance, and that performance is scheduled for two Thursdays from now. He can't just change the date of the performance (because the show fills up its performance slots well in advance), and perhaps Stoney Creek had already grabbed next week as Randy Houser's push week. So that meant a ridiculous push for "Break on Me" this week to snatch a #1 from its more natural holder. That's a good theory. Just so I understand you correctly: you're guessing Thursday, March 10, for a KU performance on Idol? If that is indeed the case, and if Stoney Creek had already "claimed" the first week of March for their push week, then I can certainly understand why Capitol decided to gun it this week. The one thing I still don't understand, though, is why they allowed Carrie to widen her lead so much last week. Yes, my theory is that Keith will perform on Idol on 10 March. I didn't love the theory for two reasons: one is that he could easily debut a new single at the ACM Awards and the other is that a 10 March debut wouldn't give "Break on Me" time to go recurrent. But on the latter, there is a good chance that after last week's manufactured boost, "Break on Me" will be Billboard recurrent in two charts. Frankly, I hope that it goes Billboard recurrent by dropping out of the top-10 on the next chart, to further illustrate how obscene last week's push was. Much like "Dibs," "Break on Me" will have spent exactly half a week in top rotation at radio and will have been secured a(n empty) #1 for it. Whether mine a good theory remains to be seen -- I think we'll know who is performing on the 10 March Idol show this coming Thursday. As for why Capitol Nashville "allowed" Carrie to widen her lead two weeks ago, maybe there was just heightened interest in "Heartbeat" in connection with the Carrie/Sam Grammy performance. It's not all that surprising that "Heartbeat" would have started getting power conversions that week -- not only is it a bigger hit than "Break on Me" and "We Went" in both sales and streaming, it is also testing better at country radio. Last week makes it clear that Sony Nashville wasn't pushing "Heartbeat," so this was likely a case of Capitol Nashville knowing that country radio had no interest in sustaining "Break on Me" in power rotation for multiple weeks (or one full week, really).
|
|
onebuffalo
Diamond Member
#LiteralLegender
I am One Buffalo.
Joined: June 2009
Posts: 26,592
|
Post by onebuffalo on Feb 29, 2016 10:10:56 GMT -5
|
|
Libra
Diamond Member
The One Who Knows Where All the Bodies Are Buried
:)
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 14,376
My Charts
|
Post by Libra on Feb 29, 2016 10:17:26 GMT -5
43dudleyvillas it can't go 3/19, this coming chart (3/12) will only be Week 19 for Keith.
|
|
sabre14
Diamond Member
Vince Gill & the Muppets make everything better
Joined: October 2013
Posts: 26,916
|
Post by sabre14 on Feb 29, 2016 11:31:47 GMT -5
They would've pushed this through Sunday if "John Cougar, John Deere, John 3:16" had hit #1 on Billboard. That wasn't the motivating factor here. Sure the more charts your song can get #1 on the better but Capitol knew they had the Billbosrd chart locked up if they continued their push one more day since Arista/Sony laid off the gas pedal this week.
|
|
Zazie
5x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 5,144
|
Post by Zazie on Feb 29, 2016 13:30:03 GMT -5
I'm generally a loyal follower of 43dudleyvillas' analysis, and I can see the possibility connection between Idol and the push to #1. But what I haven't seen explained yet is this: if this plan had to be formed in advance, why did Cap not keep BOM from developing such a big deficit to Carrie's single in order to make the climb to #1 safer and more reasonable-looking? Just an extra 500k a week would have had KU within just about 1.5 million, and that would have led to a reasonable push, not a silly one.
There were a couple of days in there with zero gain for BOM. It wouldn't have been difficult to keep that from happening. It might not even have been hard to keep Carrie from going up ahead of KU for any length of time, but just reducing the gap by 500k, or even 750k, per week for two weeks would have made the chart run easier to manage and less phony-looking to endure.
It's hard for me to see one explanation that requires a "long-run" point of view juxtaposed against other actions that failed to display a "long-run" point of view at all.
|
|
onebuffalo
Diamond Member
#LiteralLegender
I am One Buffalo.
Joined: June 2009
Posts: 26,592
|
Post by onebuffalo on Feb 29, 2016 17:03:22 GMT -5
Final MediaBase numbers:
5 1 KEITH URBAN Break On Me 8365 7188 1177 58.517
|
|
|
Post by 43dudleyvillas on Mar 1, 2016 9:18:08 GMT -5
I'm generally a loyal follower of 43dudleyvillas' analysis, and I can see the possibility connection between Idol and the push to #1. But what I haven't seen explained yet is this: if this plan had to be formed in advance, why did Cap not keep BOM from developing such a big deficit to Carrie's single in order to make the climb to #1 safer and more reasonable-looking? Just an extra 500k a week would have had KU within just about 1.5 million, and that would have led to a reasonable push, not a silly one. There were a couple of days in there with zero gain for BOM. It wouldn't have been difficult to keep that from happening. It might not even have been hard to keep Carrie from going up ahead of KU for any length of time, but just reducing the gap by 500k, or even 750k, per week for two weeks would have made the chart run easier to manage and less phony-looking to endure. It's hard for me to see one explanation that requires a "long-run" point of view juxtaposed against other actions that failed to display a "long-run" point of view at all. I am about to talk myself out of the Idol theory, or at least an Idol performance as a causal agent. So we don't actually need the Idol performance to believe there was a long-run plan for "Break on Me" to peak this week -- we have Keith's CCUSA hosting slot. Now, those do show some degree of flexibility -- with Lee Brice currently scheduled to cohost after Carrie, perhaps Keith could have slotted in there since that won't promote the peak week of Lee's single. So maybe Capitol Nashville could have tried to shift that slot and Keith's weekend Country House Party slot, etc. Maybe they didn't because of a scheduled Idol performance -- we'll know soon enough. But to pick up on another point made upthread, maybe Capitol Nashville didn't try to shift anything because they saw that "Break on Me" is not moving the needle and saw that they should move on. Maybe, and we will get a sense of this from how hard "Break on Me" falls this week, country radio had signaled to the Capitol Nashville that "Break on Me" was not the kind of single that it was interested in sustaining in max rotation for multiple weeks, or even one full week? In that scenario, Capitol Nashville really didn't have a choice but to watch "Heartbeat" distance itself, because "Heartbeat" has the makings of a song that country radio will be willing to sustain in max rotation for several weeks. But since Capitol Nashville still wanted to eke out that #1, they secured commitments for intensive play on the weekend, when perhaps country programmers are more willing to cede spins to less popular songs than they are on weekdays (certainly listening patterns are different on the weekend). As a result, it took half a week of an intensive push and the luck of Arista Nashville not fighting for the bigger hit to manufacture "Break on Me"'s #1. Another possibility: perhaps Capitol Nashville was ready to move onto a third lead single because they finally have word from Keith that he will be ready to release his album in June and the sooner they can get a new single out, the higher it will be on the charts when the album comes out. It doesn't quite go with the vague pronouncements Keith has been making about his album progress, but I feel obligated to at least acknowledge the possibility. "Dibs" lost nearly 13.6 million in audience this past week, about 30% of its airplay the previous week, in one week while falling from #1 to #10. It will be tough for "Break on Me" to match that, I think, but I'll be interested to see how close it gets. Libra, thank you for the correction on when "Break on Me" can go recurrent. I had spaced on the 20-week rule.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2016 20:28:45 GMT -5
It's strange that this needed such a big push to hit the top, especially since it just wrapped up a 3rd week at #1 on the Billboard Country Indicator chart. Normally songs that are big hits on the secondary charts don't need to be pushed to the top of the main charts.
I like the theory that perhaps Capitol Nashville had received some feedback that radio wasn't likely to support "Break On Me" in high rotation for much longer, and the reason I like this theory is because I don't like absurd chart pushes, but if radio was ready to drop the song, then I can sort of understand why Capitol gunned for #1 this past week. This scenario would sort of justify the big push.
But the performance of "Break On Me" on the Indicator chart seems to contradict the theory that radio was ready to reduce the song's airplay in the coming weeks. Obviously the song is going to drop now because of the big push, but a part of me still wonders if it could have waited out "Heartbeat" and had a more natural ascension to the top spot a couple weeks from now. I guess we'll never know...
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2016 20:34:24 GMT -5
It's strange that this needed such a big push to hit the top, especially since it just wrapped up a 3rd week at #1 on the Billboard Country Indicator chart. Normally songs that are big hits on the secondary charts don't need to be pushed to the top of the main charts. I like the theory that perhaps Capitol Nashville had received some feedback that radio wasn't likely to support "Break On Me" in high rotation for much longer, and the reason I like this theory is because I don't like absurd chart pushes, but if radio was ready to drop the song, then I can sort of understand why Capitol gunned for #1 this past week. This scenario would sort of justify the big push. But the performance of "Break On Me" on the Indicator chart seems to contradict the theory that radio was ready to reduce the song's airplay in the coming weeks. Obviously the song is going to drop now because of the big push, but a part of me still wonders if it could have waited out "Heartbeat" and had a more natural ascension to the top spot a couple weeks from now. I guess we'll never know... Maybe it was more of the primary radio stations that were ready to drop this song and not have it in high rotation. I do think if "Break On Me" outwaited "Heartbeat" Keith Urban would probably have to host CCUSA after Carrie Underwood. That's just my theory.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2016 20:40:53 GMT -5
It's strange that this needed such a big push to hit the top, especially since it just wrapped up a 3rd week at #1 on the Billboard Country Indicator chart. Normally songs that are big hits on the secondary charts don't need to be pushed to the top of the main charts. I like the theory that perhaps Capitol Nashville had received some feedback that radio wasn't likely to support "Break On Me" in high rotation for much longer, and the reason I like this theory is because I don't like absurd chart pushes, but if radio was ready to drop the song, then I can sort of understand why Capitol gunned for #1 this past week. This scenario would sort of justify the big push. But the performance of "Break On Me" on the Indicator chart seems to contradict the theory that radio was ready to reduce the song's airplay in the coming weeks. Obviously the song is going to drop now because of the big push, but a part of me still wonders if it could have waited out "Heartbeat" and had a more natural ascension to the top spot a couple weeks from now. I guess we'll never know... Maybe it was more of the primary radio stations that were ready to drop this song and not have it in high rotation. I do think if "Break On Me" outwaited "Heartbeat" Keith Urban would probably have to host CCUSA after Carrie Underwood. That's just my theory. And I think you're getting too hung up on the CC-USA thing It's true that labels generally like to have their songs peak when the artist is co-hosting CC-USA, but in the grand scheme of things, an extra countdown spin only matters in a close race for #1. It might contribute an extra 300k or so of audience. If Capitol hadn't done the big push last week, I think it's entirely possible that BOM could have kept climbing for another couple of weeks. Yes, it's possible that the main panel stations may have been ready to drop BOM, but I think it's also possible that it's natural peak week might have been closer towards the middle of March. But again, we'll probably never know for sure. Depending on how hard BOM falls this week, perhaps we'll be able to make a better guess.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2016 20:47:49 GMT -5
Maybe it was more of the primary radio stations that were ready to drop this song and not have it in high rotation. I do think if "Break On Me" outwaited "Heartbeat" Keith Urban would probably have to host CCUSA after Carrie Underwood. That's just my theory. And I think you're getting too hung up on the CC-USA thing It's true that labels generally like to have their songs peak when the artist is co-hosting CC-USA, but in the grand scheme of things, an extra countdown spin only matters in a close race for #1. It might contribute an extra 300k or so of audience. If Capitol hadn't done the big push last week, I think it's entirely possible that BOM could have kept climbing for another couple of weeks. Yes, it's possible that the main panel stations may have been ready to drop BOM, but I think it's also possible that it's natural peak week might have been closer towards the middle of March. But again, we'll probably never know for sure. Depending on how hard BOM falls this week, perhaps we'll be able to make a better guess. I just find it weird that Keith Urban push week corresponded with CC-USA, same thing with Kelsea Ballerini and Luke Bryan with their push weeks. 9 times out of 10 they correspond with each other, I recall it happened the last time with FGL and Old Dominion when that whole stir fry happened. My ultimate point is that more often than not that co-hosting schedule tends to be indicative of when songs will peak more or less.
|
|