ampersand
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2016
Posts: 1,677
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by ampersand on Sept 1, 2023 17:57:54 GMT -5
I'm not sure how big her concert film will open tbh. I really doubt 100 million is feasible as that number just seems too huge, even for Taylor to do all by herself. I do think she'll top Bieber's $29 million opening ($73 million total) however and will go on to take the title for the highest grossing concert film ever though! I am gonna say she opens with around $45-50 million, which would be amazing! $37M from day one presales. $100M at play. Bieber's record is surely going down. Streaming premiere expected towards the end of the year or early 2024. Can't wait to see it on my 60 inch screen (it's not coming to theaters here sadly). It won't be on streaming until January 13th at the earliest. It's been reported that Taylor's deal with AMC is that she has to wait 13 weeks before she can put it on streaming. Some other interesting news about the deal:
|
|
👑 Eloquent ™
Diamond Member
TSC: Certified Member
Joined: September 2007
Posts: 22,034
|
Post by 👑 Eloquent ™ on Sept 1, 2023 18:14:11 GMT -5
I'm not sure how big her concert film will open tbh. I really doubt 100 million is feasible as that number just seems too huge, even for Taylor to do all by herself. I do think she'll top Bieber's $29 million opening ($73 million total) however and will go on to take the title for the highest grossing concert film ever though! I am gonna say she opens with around $45-50 million, which would be amazing! $37M from day one presales. $100M at play. Bieber's record is surely going down. Streaming premiere expected towards the end of the year or early 2024. Can't wait to see it on my 60 inch screen (it's not coming to theaters here sadly). Yeah I already addressed it on the last page. His record for sure is in shambles. $100 million is just INSANE to think of. Like truly insane. Even for Taylor. Like that would be a fantastic opening for a feature film, but for a concert?!!! I love how Taylor always exceeds expectations, mine included The article said she is gunning for what, a $70 million opening? Bananas.
|
|
Choco
Diamond Member
james dean daydream
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 27,985
My Charts
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by Choco on Sept 1, 2023 18:56:52 GMT -5
Numbers have to be taken with a grain of salt because by design these concert films are very frontloaded. But I think worst case scenario it opens to 60M which is already 3x the budget.
|
|
👑 Eloquent ™
Diamond Member
TSC: Certified Member
Joined: September 2007
Posts: 22,034
|
Post by 👑 Eloquent ™ on Sept 1, 2023 19:11:59 GMT -5
Wait, could this tie Jennifer Lopez's record of having the #1 album and #1 movie at the box office with 1989(TV)? Oh dang...no...it's too far apart. Missed opportunity! lol
|
|
|
Post by ificanthaveyou on Sept 1, 2023 22:12:35 GMT -5
Wait, could this tie Jennifer Lopez's record of having the #1 album and #1 movie at the box office with 1989(TV)? Oh dang...no...it's too far apart. Missed opportunity! lol October is a SUPER weak month due to the strike. If she releases Eras: Extended Edition with all of the surprise performances added it can definitely make another 10 million easily. Taylor is the Queen of Re-Releases!
|
|
|
Post by Rose "Payola" Nylund on Sept 1, 2023 22:15:36 GMT -5
Has she had anything on streaming other than Disney+?
|
|
|
Post by ificanthaveyou on Sept 1, 2023 22:15:58 GMT -5
Has she had anything on streaming other than Disney+? Netflix!
|
|
Choco
Diamond Member
james dean daydream
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 27,985
My Charts
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by Choco on Sept 1, 2023 23:46:53 GMT -5
1989 tour had some sort of Apple deal as well, then she had Reputation and Miss Americana on Netflix.
There are currently no deals with any major studio for this so it will likely go to whichever streamer pays the most.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2023 4:59:04 GMT -5
When Long Ponds came out, I thought the deal with Apple was for two “movies.” If that’s true there should be one left in that deal.
|
|
Choco
Diamond Member
james dean daydream
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 27,985
My Charts
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by Choco on Sept 2, 2023 11:25:54 GMT -5
When Long Ponds came out, I thought the deal with Apple was for two “movies.” If that’s true there should be one left in that deal. Long Pond was on Disney+.
|
|
thezatch
Platinum Member
Joined: August 2015
Posts: 1,938
|
Post by thezatch on Sept 2, 2023 12:58:17 GMT -5
If she is smart (and we all know she is), she will keep this in theatres as long as possible. As it was pointed out previously, theatres are hurting for content to draw people in (October this year was kind of light to begin with, even before the strikes) and she will get a higher percentage of the profits from ticket sales if it’s kept in theatres over one lump sum selling it to a streamer. Plus once it’s streaming, it will be pirated, and she sees no coins from that.
Go to the movies, y’all.
|
|
👑 Eloquent ™
Diamond Member
TSC: Certified Member
Joined: September 2007
Posts: 22,034
|
Post by 👑 Eloquent ™ on Sept 2, 2023 20:33:52 GMT -5
Did anyone catch what Olivia Rodrigo said about Taylor and the possibility of "Vampire" being about her? She essentially left the door open and with an answer pretty much ripped from the Swift handbook (she doesn't like to pigeonhole and say who her songs are about but was surprised people thought that etc). That rubbed me the wrong way. Like girl, be so for real. You don't have to say who it's about to say it isn't about Taylor. No need to further use her name to generage buzz for your new lukewarm era when so much of your artistry is influenced by her to begin with. lol
|
|
ampersand
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2016
Posts: 1,677
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by ampersand on Sept 2, 2023 22:21:59 GMT -5
Lol. I truly don't understand the issue here. Is Taylor the only one who is allowed to say she doesn't want to be specific about who her songs are about? I think the fact that Olivia is surprised that people think it's about Taylor pretty much says everything here. I don't know how you can listen to "Vampire" and think it's about her unless you're really reaching.
|
|
|
Post by suburbandreams on Sept 2, 2023 22:56:58 GMT -5
Lol. I truly don't understand the issue here. Is Taylor the only one who is allowed to say she doesn't want to be specific about who her songs are about? I think the fact that Olivia is surprised that people think it's about Taylor pretty much says everything here. I don't know how you can listen to "Vampire" and think it's about her unless you're really reaching. The issue is that stans and gossip lovers on twitter and reddit have imagined a giant feud between Taylor and Olivia. The evidence is that Olivia no longer wants to talk about Taylor and that Taylor received credits for deja vu. It's unclear what actually happened. Haley Williams didn't know about receiving credit for misery business until the deal was done. This isn't surprising since it's basically always publishers that manage copyright issues. It would make sense for Taylor/Jack's publisher to reach out to Olivia's team or Olivia's team to reach out first since Olivia both copied the melody of cadence of Cruel Summer's bridge and admitted that she set out to mimic said bridge when crafting the song. There are many ways that situation could have gone done but the speculation has become very toxic. There is clearly some tension but neither one wants to talk about each other so people should really leave it alone. But there's a big desire for them to be at odds and most especially for Taylor to have victimized Olivia. Anytime when Olivia's tries to avoid talking about Taylor, it gives them more grist for the narrative. As a result, of people dragging Taylor over Olivia, many swifties are now pissed at Olivia. They want Olivia to stop completely dodging Taylor questions and just say something positive about Taylor to stop the feud rumors. So Olivia dodging the vampire question in an interview where she also had a little discussion about the plagarism rumors is really pissing off the swifties because Taylor is getting dragged a lot over the credits. They want Olivia either to discuss her issues with Taylor or start blacklisting Taylor questions for her interviewers. It's toxic situation. I wish people would allow two women to not be best buds and have some tension between each other without making it into a huge deal. But unfortunately, mentioning Taylor drives web traffic so all the interviewers are asking Olivia about it and it's increasing the toxicity. People want to make vampire about Taylor for this narrative.
|
|
ampersand
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2016
Posts: 1,677
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by ampersand on Sept 2, 2023 23:17:12 GMT -5
This whole situation is hilarious to me. Do people seriously believe that Taylor Swift, a 33 year-old woman, is beefing with someone who was recently a teenager? If some Swifties honestly believe that, it says more about what they really think about their fav than anything about either of these two women.
|
|
taylor
Diamond Member
Pulse’s #1 Conan Stan
Best Country Poster 2023 and 2x Woman of the Year!!!
Joined: October 2019
Posts: 16,432
Pronouns: he/they/she
|
Post by taylor on Sept 2, 2023 23:33:56 GMT -5
What’s even funnier is that “vampire” is literally about a man Olivia was in a toxic relationship with, referred to sarcastically as “cool guy” at one point early on. It’s been said before when “vampire” first released that not one lyric in that song has a modicum of relevance to Taylor, and if it weren’t for that trash Guardian bringing Taylor up I would see no other reason for Liv to be brought up in here at the moment. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
|
|
Post by suburbandreams on Sept 2, 2023 23:41:01 GMT -5
This whole situation is hilarious to me. Do people seriously believe that Taylor Swift, a 33 year-old woman, is beefing with someone who was recently a teenager? If some Swifties honestly believe that, it says more about what they really think about their fav than anything about either of these two women. It's more about the nature of stan spaces. Stans use anything and everything to attack their fan's rivals. It then makes the opposing stans more defensive and aggressive in return. It creates a really toxic cycle where stans attack other artists because said artist's stans attacked their favs. Lana and Taylor stans were giving each other's album 0 stars on metacritic in 2019 since the two albums had started getting compared in stan bases. A stan leaving a 0 star review would lead many opposing stans to do the same (this happens with many different pop artists when they release around the same time). Since Taylor is the most commercially successful artist of the 21th century, she also gets one of the most if not the most amount of baseless attacks. This actually feeds the size of her stanbase as said attacks make stans more dedicated. You can really see this phenoma in kpop survival shows. Bahiyyih and Wonhee were contestants that got attacked due to their young age and relative inexperience. This resulted in them having the biggest solo fanbases as stans started passionately supporting them because they were put off by the attacks against them. By nature of them being on a reality competition show, they weren't interacting with online stans at all but the stan ecosystem still led to this toxic cycle.
|
|
Caviar
Diamond Member
Queen X
Joined: October 2003
Posts: 31,166
My Charts
Pronouns: He/his
|
Post by Caviar on Sept 3, 2023 1:01:56 GMT -5
That’s why Doja cusses out the Kittens so much. Stan culture is TOXIC.
|
|
Choco
Diamond Member
james dean daydream
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 27,985
My Charts
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by Choco on Sept 3, 2023 1:31:18 GMT -5
All valid comments here but I'm not huge on the way Olivia worded her response. These interviews are all pre approved and yet the answer was vague enough to fuel a stan war when she could have just talked about how it was about an old flame.
Yeah yeah, stan culture is toxic (until you need 30k people to blindly buy a digital single or a variant cover to ensure a higher peak...)
|
|
daddy
Platinum Member
Joined: November 2017
Posts: 1,407
|
Post by daddy on Sept 3, 2023 3:50:08 GMT -5
Even as a Taylor stan, I find Swifties getting upset at Olivia over this comical as back in the day (around Olivia’s age), Taylor very likely would have provided a very similar sort of answer 😂
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2023 5:00:23 GMT -5
Even as a Taylor stan, I find Swifties getting upset at Olivia over this comical as back in the day (around Olivia’s age), Taylor very likely would have provided a very similar sort of answer 😂 What's wrong with that answer at any given age tho?
|
|
ampersand
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2016
Posts: 1,677
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by ampersand on Sept 3, 2023 11:29:32 GMT -5
|
|
Marooned@Midnight
6x Platinum Member
It’s me…HI!…I’m the problem, it’s me
Joined: September 2007
Posts: 6,800
|
Post by Marooned@Midnight on Sept 3, 2023 14:24:47 GMT -5
^what an unexpected and interesting read.
|
|
👑 Eloquent ™
Diamond Member
TSC: Certified Member
Joined: September 2007
Posts: 22,034
|
Post by 👑 Eloquent ™ on Sept 3, 2023 17:41:14 GMT -5
All valid comments here but I'm not huge on the way Olivia worded her response. These interviews are all pre approved and yet the answer was vague enough to fuel a stan war when she could have just talked about how it was about an old flame. Yeah yeah, stan culture is toxic (until you need 30k people to blindly buy a digital single or a variant cover to ensure a higher peak...) This was my only complaint. Like it would have been so simple to dismiss without revealing who the song was written about (especially given she is aware of what people have been saying about their "fued"). The answer felt intentionally vague which then makes me question the purpose.
|
|
Choco
Diamond Member
james dean daydream
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 27,985
My Charts
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by Choco on Sept 4, 2023 0:01:58 GMT -5
Which to me just points to the fact that something went on behind the scenes, likely due to the Deja Vu/Cruel Summer credits.
|
|
Joe1240
6x Platinum Member
Taylor Swift-The Best in Pop & Country Music!
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 6,960
|
Post by Joe1240 on Sept 4, 2023 7:07:12 GMT -5
When Long Ponds came out, I thought the deal with Apple was for two “movies.” If that’s true there should be one left in that deal. The Director for The Eras Tour movie also directed both Billie Ellish and BTS Disney Plus films and Taylor still has one movie left in her contract. There is a very good chance it lands there.
|
|
daddy
Platinum Member
Joined: November 2017
Posts: 1,407
|
Post by daddy on Sept 4, 2023 10:17:32 GMT -5
Even as a Taylor stan, I find Swifties getting upset at Olivia over this comical as back in the day (around Olivia’s age), Taylor very likely would have provided a very similar sort of answer 😂 What's wrong with that answer at any given age tho? There’s nothing wrong with it. Assuming it’s not about Taylor, it would be very easy to say “no” to the question and nip any discussion of it in the bud. But that’s not going to get the public talking about it anymore. The ambiguous answer leaves it open to either possibility, driving fans to discuss it (as we are on this board). While I won’t assume it was Olivia’s intention, her response was an easy way to get people talking about her/“Vampire”.
|
|
musiclife
Platinum Member
Joined: November 2022
Posts: 1,820
|
Post by musiclife on Sept 4, 2023 11:54:31 GMT -5
^what an unexpected and interesting read. Yeah, fantastic read.
|
|
|
Post by ificanthaveyou on Sept 4, 2023 17:50:01 GMT -5
Any idea if Taylor is performing at the VMAs next week?
I could see her promoting her movie by performing Cruel Summer, Karma, and Blank Space (TV)…
|
|
|
Post by Rose "Payola" Nylund on Sept 5, 2023 8:58:31 GMT -5
I'm not sure the movie needs promotion.
She could still show up to perform just because. It would be fun!
|
|