|
Post by Daryl the Beryl on Jul 16, 2024 21:32:28 GMT -5
|
|
narp
3x Platinum Member
Joined: November 2018
Posts: 3,718
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by narp on Jul 17, 2024 8:21:26 GMT -5
If they can hit the top ten with this on alt, they'll be the second of only two possible artists who've hit the top ten on Alternative Airplay within each decade of the chart's existence. The only other band who can (and did!) do this is Red Hot Chili Peppers.
|
|
Devin
Diamond Member
Best Rock Poster 2011―2014
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 14,005
My Charts
Pronouns: He/Him
|
Post by Devin on Jul 17, 2024 8:29:45 GMT -5
If they can hit the top ten with this on alt, they'll be the second of only two possible artists who've hit the top ten on Alternative Airplay within each decade of the chart's existence. The only other band who can (and did!) do this is Red Hot Chili Peppers. I was going to mention Depeche Mode, but they didn't reach the Top 10 at all in the 2010s.
|
|
maseruck
Gold Member
These guys from Twilight?
Joined: March 2024
Posts: 654
|
Post by maseruck on Jul 17, 2024 8:30:07 GMT -5
If they can hit the top ten with this on alt, they'll be the second of only two possible artists who've hit the top ten on Alternative Airplay within each decade of the chart's existence. The only other band who can (and did!) do this is Red Hot Chili Peppers. What makes this even more impressive if Jane’s Addiction does this is that they’ve only released one album a decade.
|
|
narp
3x Platinum Member
Joined: November 2018
Posts: 3,718
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by narp on Jul 17, 2024 13:55:29 GMT -5
I was going to mention Depeche Mode, but they didn't reach the Top 10 at all in the 2010s. Out of all the artists who hit the top ten in the 80s, had continued radio success in the following decades, and were still actively releasing music in the 2010s, U2 and Depeche Mode were the next closest bands who could achieve this. U2 missed the top 20 entirely in the 2010s on Billboard, and Depeche Mode peaked at 12 twice in the 2000s and only charted thrice in the 2010s with none of the three singles reaching higher than the top 30. What makes this even more impressive if Jane’s Addiction does this is that they’ve only released one album a decade. While not as impressive, Beastie Boys and Cake could both do something similar by charting in four different decades while hitting the top ten a similarly low amount of times. Beastie Boys only have 3 top tens while Cake have 4. Sorry but I'm really excited at the prospect of this happening lol
|
|
|
Post by torgojohnson on Jul 17, 2024 14:04:27 GMT -5
I was going to mention Depeche Mode, but they didn't reach the Top 10 at all in the 2010s. Out of all the artists who hit the top ten in the 80s, had continued radio success in the following decades, and were still actively releasing music in the 2010s, U2 and Depeche Mode were the next closest bands who could achieve this. U2 missed the top 20 entirely in the 2010s on Billboard, and Depeche Mode peaked at 12 twice in the 2000s and only charted thrice in the 2010s with none of the three singles reaching higher than the top 30. What makes this even more impressive if Jane’s Addiction does this is that they’ve only released one album a decade. While not as impressive, Beastie Boys and Cake could both do something similar by charting in four different decades while hitting the top ten a similarly low amount of times. Beastie Boys only have 3 top tens while Cake have 4. Sorry but I'm really excited at the prospect of this happening lol It won't be the Beastie Boys. They died when MCA did
|
|
|
Post by Daryl the Beryl on Jul 24, 2024 11:09:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by thirddegree50123 on Jul 24, 2024 11:32:26 GMT -5
It's ok. I would like to see it go top 10 so the aforementioned achievement is completed. But I think it's going to have to go top 10 on hype alone. The chorus doesn't hit like "Just Because" or "Irresistible Forces"
|
|
PrezSquid
Charting
That 91X Nerd
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 309
Pronouns: He/Him
|
Post by PrezSquid on Jul 24, 2024 13:37:36 GMT -5
Really hate how they just rush everything in the beginning. Like, the verses, some riffs and stuff and the chorus are already in the song within 30 seconds, compare that to their older songs and even stuff like Twisted Tales where they took some time for everything to flesh out. Good production but it really feels like it needed some extra stuff or more length. Feels like they're working at tiktok length
|
|
macattack
3x Platinum Member
Joined: April 2019
Posts: 3,863
|
Post by macattack on Jul 24, 2024 16:26:22 GMT -5
Really hate how they just rush everything in the beginning. Like, the verses, some riffs and stuff and the chorus are already in the song within 30 seconds, compare that to their older songs and even stuff like Twisted Tales where they took some time for everything to flesh out. Good production but it really feels like it needed some extra stuff or more length. Feels like they're working at tiktok length They almost certainly are working at TikTok length. The song length is 3:04, and that's around when analysts recommend stopping because TikTok tends to dislike longer songs.
|
|
|
Post by Daryl the Beryl on Aug 6, 2024 12:05:03 GMT -5
Top 50 on Active:
68 50 JANE'S ADDICTION Imminent Redemption 90 44 46 0.084
|
|
rainie
8x Platinum Member
what else is in the teaches of peaches ?
Joined: February 2016
Posts: 8,724
Pronouns: they / them
|
Post by rainie on Aug 6, 2024 23:32:59 GMT -5
wasn't expecting this to reach active first, huh
|
|
macattack
3x Platinum Member
Joined: April 2019
Posts: 3,863
|
Post by macattack on Aug 7, 2024 1:09:40 GMT -5
wasn't expecting this to reach active first, huh Much lower barrier to chart entry.
|
|
|
Post by Walking Contradiction on Aug 7, 2024 16:27:35 GMT -5
Really hate how they just rush everything in the beginning. Like, the verses, some riffs and stuff and the chorus are already in the song within 30 seconds, compare that to their older songs and even stuff like Twisted Tales where they took some time for everything to flesh out. Good production but it really feels like it needed some extra stuff or more length. Feels like they're working at tiktok length They almost certainly are working at TikTok length. The song length is 3:04, and that's around when analysts recommend stopping because TikTok tends to dislike longer songs. Isn't that basically what single length expectations were back in the '60s? Everything old is new again. Not sure why a veteran rock band like Jane's Addiction would need to follow TikTok guidelines though. This also feels much more "butt rock" than I'd typically expect from them.
|
|
maseruck
Gold Member
These guys from Twilight?
Joined: March 2024
Posts: 654
|
Post by maseruck on Aug 7, 2024 17:49:07 GMT -5
wasn't expecting this to reach active first, huh Much lower barrier to chart entry. Also Alt gave this song basically no second week adds.
|
|
|
Post by Daryl the Beryl on Aug 10, 2024 6:27:08 GMT -5
Top 50 on Alternative:
56 50 JANE'S ADDICTION Imminent Redemption 176 97 79 0.041
|
|
|
Post by Daryl the Beryl on Aug 21, 2024 9:39:54 GMT -5
48 48 JANE'S ADDICTION Imminent Redemption 227 205 22 0.027
44 49 JANE'S ADDICTION Imminent Redemption 108 136 -28 0.098
You would think with the current trend of veterans doing well, this would be doing better.
|
|
macattack
3x Platinum Member
Joined: April 2019
Posts: 3,863
|
Post by macattack on Aug 21, 2024 23:07:41 GMT -5
48 48 JANE'S ADDICTION Imminent Redemption 227 205 22 0.027 44 49 JANE'S ADDICTION Imminent Redemption 108 136 -28 0.098 You would think with the current trend of veterans doing well, this would be doing better. No label help. That’s probably a huge factor.
|
|