|
Post by pophector on Sept 23, 2003 15:55:13 GMT -5
For CHR/Pop: www2.uta.edu/hunt/charts/christinaaguilera.htmlPlus: Can't Hold Us Down: #3* CHR/Rhythmic "Genie In A Bottle" #1[5 weeks] "What A Girl Wants" #1[2] "I Turn To You" #12 "Come On Over Baby(All I Want Is You)" #11 "Lady Marmalade" #1[2] "Dirrty" #26 "Beautiful" #21 "Can't Hold Us Down" #20 Hot AC: "Genie In A Bottle" #27 "What A Girl Wants" #29 "I Turn To You" #25 "Come On Over Baby(All I Want Is You)" #28 "Lady Marmalade" #21 "Beautiful" #9 "Fighter" #27 Urban "Lady Marmalade" #32 AC "Reflection" #15[4 weeks] "I Turn To You" #4 "Beautiful" #1[8 weeks] However, I do not know "Nobody Wants To Be Lonely"'s peak. :(
|
|
|
Post by Eyeball on Sept 23, 2003 18:38:49 GMT -5
These are the AT40 chart runs that I have:
Lady Marmalade: 33-19-14-9-7-3-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-8-12-15-19
Dirrrrrrrrty: 29-23-16-16-14-20-23-30-32-36-36-35-33-30-37-35-37
Beautiful: 35-20-11-7-5-2-1-1-1-1-2-2-3-4-6-7-9-10-14-18
Fighter: 25-20-15-12-9-9-8-8-8-5-6-6-9-11-14-19-21-25-28
Can't Hold Us Down (so far): 37-27-21-14-11-9-5-4-3-
|
|
Keith3000
3x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 3,369
|
Post by Keith3000 on Sept 24, 2003 1:09:35 GMT -5
&num Lady Marmalade: 33-19-14-9-7-3-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-8-12-15-19 So "Lady Marmalade" left the Top 40 after only 5 weeks? Wow, is this some kinda record? I know this is because of recurrent rules, but still, dude, that's one fast dropper!
|
|
JCMF3
Diamond Member
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 18,677
|
Post by JCMF3 on Sept 24, 2003 9:31:15 GMT -5
&num So "Lady Marmalade" left the Top 40 after only 5 weeks? Wow, is this some kinda record? I know this is because of recurrent rules, but still, dude, that's one fast dropper! On AT40, this is true, but at that time R&R also had a "silly" recurrent rule - 25/-3, which basically meant any song that did not have a bullet for three straight weeks and was below #25 was moved to recurrent. Victims of this rule included LM and Pop by *N Sync. Also, on R&R, LM only spent 9 weeks @ #1 and fell 1-2-8.
|
|
Hervard
9x Platinum Member
Joined: September 2003
Posts: 9,744
|
Post by Hervard on Sept 26, 2003 12:22:07 GMT -5
We never did find out which recurrent rule AT40 used during the time they deviated from the R&R chart, did we?
As far as we know, they drew the titles of songs that were more than ten weeks old out of a hat.
|
|
|
Post by Rose "Payola" Nylund on Sept 26, 2003 14:20:25 GMT -5
Except 'Nobody Wants To Be Lonely', which was 9 weeks when it fell off, wasn't it? At least in Top 40 terms.
|
|
|
Post by Eyeball on Sept 26, 2003 16:08:35 GMT -5
Wasn't it something like, songs that are unbulleted for 3 weeks and outside the Top 10 are taken off?
That produced some weird chart runs...for instance, Coldplay "Yellow" fell off from its peak of #22.
It seems to have caused some kind of vicious cycle effect...songs are removed from ridiculously high positions (as high as #11), causing more songs to rise on the chart while losing spins, so they went recurrent only a week or two after peaking on the chart because they "vacuum-effected" to their peak. Those songs being removed causes MORE vacuum effect, and so on and so forth.
Later I think they changed it to 3 weeks unbulleted and below #25, causing songs like "Drive" and "Drops Of Jupiter" to get more weeks on than they should have had, making for less debuts and a slower-movibng lower part of the chart.
|
|