zago
Gold Member
Joined: September 2006
Posts: 978
|
Post by zago on Aug 24, 2007 6:57:42 GMT -5
Best sellers of 2006 releases TO DATE Red Hot Chili Peppers Stadium Arcadium 6.941.000 7.461.575 Soundtrack High School Musical 6.707.000 7.210.025 Justin Timberlake FutureSex / LoveSounds 6.652.000 7.150.900 Nelly Furtado Loose 6.259.000 6.728.425 Beyoncé B'Day 5.157.000 5.543.775 Pink I'm Not Dead 5.127.000 5.511.525 The Beatles Love 4.596.000 4.940.700 Rascal Flatts Me And My Gang 4.435.000 4.767.625 Snow Patrol Eyes Open 4.336.000 4.661.200 Evanescence The Open Door 4.177.000 4.490.275 !!UPDATED!! Full List at www.worldwidealbums.tk/TOP of 2007 RELEASE to date Linkin Park Minutes To Midnight 3.824.000 4.110.800 Avril Lavigne The Best Damn Thing 3.681.000 3.957.075 Norah Jones Not Too Late 3.466.000 3.725.950 Mika Life In Cartoon Motion 2.973.000 3.195.975 Michael Bublé Call Me Irresponsible 2.465.000 2.649.875 Maroon 5 It Won't Be Soon Before Long 2.286.000 2.457.450 Fall Out Boy Infinity On High 2.005.000 2.155.375 Bon Jovi Lost Highway 1.911.000 2.054.325 Rihanna Good Girl Gone Bad 1.606.000 1.726.450 Timbaland Timbaland Presents Shock Value 1.461.000 1.570.575 !!UPDATED!! Full List at www.worldwidealbums.tk/- more lists with personal Best Album list year by year and '80 -'90 Songs list with Youtube links and the first part of Music Genres Guide.
|
|
YoYoCanUSeeMe?!
3x Platinum Member
http://instagram.com/matthew_riva
Joined: January 2007
Posts: 3,997
|
Post by YoYoCanUSeeMe?! on Aug 24, 2007 8:23:12 GMT -5
!!! Official comunication (:lol: :lol: ) sometimes labels release some sales data, when i see it i compare that data with my estimations, usually the two data is really similar, but sometimes the difference is too big. is the case of Nelly Furtado and Justin Timberlake: Labels release an article where they said: Justin Timberlake FutureSex / LoveSounds 6,6M Nelly Furtado Loose 6,1M in this case I should modify my estimations, sorry for NF and JT timberlake fans but i want to make my site more reliable possible. so please don't ask something like "why Nelly Furtado was at almost 8m and now only 6" or something like that.Thanks! In this case i will delete 700k at JT and 1m at NF. for the future if you find an article from labels with big difference from my estimations (like more than 500k) please say it to me :wink: thanks! are u sure that the label estimations are actual ?!
|
|
zago
Gold Member
Joined: September 2006
Posts: 978
|
Post by zago on Aug 24, 2007 19:09:29 GMT -5
!!! Official comunication (:lol: :lol: ) sometimes labels release some sales data, when i see it i compare that data with my estimations, usually the two data is really similar, but sometimes the difference is too big. is the case of Nelly Furtado and Justin Timberlake: Labels release an article where they said: Justin Timberlake FutureSex / LoveSounds 6,6M Nelly Furtado Loose 6,1M in this case I should modify my estimations, sorry for NF and JT timberlake fans but i want to make my site more reliable possible. so please don't ask something like "why Nelly Furtado was at almost 8m and now only 6" or something like that.Thanks! In this case i will delete 700k at JT and 1m at NF. for the future if you find an article from labels with big difference from my estimations (like more than 500k) please say it to me :wink: thanks! are u sure that the label estimations are actual ?! yes. the previous data seems to me always a bit "big".
|
|
Acid Eyes
Diamond Member
Joined: June 2007
Posts: 10,910
|
Post by Acid Eyes on Aug 24, 2007 19:13:15 GMT -5
You have been getting your data from Media Traffic, right?
While I would not deny that some of the numbers on the United World Chart are a bit inflated, I can only assume that all the numbers are inflated, not just Nelly's or Justin's. This may be partly due to all the numbers being rounded to the nearest thousand.
So, if you are going to decrease the sales for those albums, you would need to decrease the numbers for all albums (keeping the ratio the same).
UWC is not a shipment chart, it is a sales chart. Labels are not inflating those numbers. Mistakes occur due to rounding, but that happens across the board, not just to a few select albums.
|
|
slirk
Charting
Joined: April 2007
Posts: 243
|
Post by slirk on Aug 25, 2007 3:11:08 GMT -5
I reckon the labels estimates are full of crap - 'loose' has been certified triple platinum by mediatraffic for the past 10 weeks and has sold much more then 259,000 in those 10 weeks. It's been near 100k for most of those weeks.
|
|
|
Post by itsbeenaweek on Aug 25, 2007 3:34:32 GMT -5
I reckon the labels estimates are full of crap - 'loose' has been certified triple platinum by mediatraffic for the past 10 weeks and has sold much more then 259,000 in those 10 weeks. It's been near 100k for most of those weeks. You realize Mediatraffic isn't an official chart, right?
|
|
WotUNeed
2x Platinum Member
Deacon Blues
Joined: April 2010
Posts: 2,935
|
Post by WotUNeed on Aug 25, 2007 3:43:23 GMT -5
You have been getting your data from Media Traffic, right? While I would not deny that some of the numbers on the United World Chart are a bit inflated, I can only assume that all the numbers are inflated, not just Nelly's or Justin's. This may be partly due to all the numbers being rounded to the nearest thousand. So, if you are going to decrease the sales for those albums, you would need to decrease the numbers for all albums (keeping the ratio the same). UWC is not a shipment chart, it is a sales chart. Labels are not inflating those numbers. Mistakes occur due to rounding, but that happens across the board, not just to a few select albums. But then there's absolutely no way of verifying the credibility of any of the numbers, because who knows what the real ratio would be for each? It's very unlikely they've all been inflated or deflated by the same amount. It makes much more sense to do as zago is doing and make sure that all numbers are sourceable.
|
|
zago
Gold Member
Joined: September 2006
Posts: 978
|
Post by zago on Aug 25, 2007 3:56:21 GMT -5
You have been getting your data from Media Traffic, right? While I would not deny that some of the numbers on the United World Chart are a bit inflated, I can only assume that all the numbers are inflated, not just Nelly's or Justin's. This may be partly due to all the numbers being rounded to the nearest thousand. So, if you are going to decrease the sales for those albums, you would need to decrease the numbers for all albums (keeping the ratio the same). UWC is not a shipment chart, it is a sales chart. Labels are not inflating those numbers. Mistakes occur due to rounding, but that happens across the board, not just to a few select albums. not all sales are inflated..maybe they tend to overstimate also only one of country (example germany) and then the albums huge here tend to be a bit inflated: it happened already sometimes that the estimations are almost the same of some labels release or some call "official". someone say that mediatraffic overstimate the first weeks, i think no. this is the first case that i've see where someone (not only geffen but Sonhy one month a go talk about 5,5m., not almost 8m) released an article with such different salesdata.. in more almost all the other albums if we try to add country by country the sales that we have the result is always really near to the data. in Nelly Furtado case i've always seen something strange..2m in USA, almost but still not over 3m in Europe, around 500k in canada..nice sales in south america and oceania, not so good in Asia..but it can't put it to 7,7m...honestly. however i've just delete a -1m..for next week i continue to add her sales (taken from Mediatraffic if it is in top 40, if no estimate it). and there is also the fact of adding 7,5%..i've always say that the real sales is impossible to have but could stay in the interval between minimun and maximun : last week was 7.180.000-real data-7.718.500 this week 6.259.000-real data-6.728.425 as u see before the data in teory could be also 7.1m (the minimun), now also 6,7m (the maximum)..there still isn't so difference..only 400k.
|
|
|
Post by 455555 on Aug 25, 2007 9:18:20 GMT -5
Mediatraffic is FAR from official. It's just some random guy doing estimates.
|
|
Acid Eyes
Diamond Member
Joined: June 2007
Posts: 10,910
|
Post by Acid Eyes on Aug 25, 2007 10:35:52 GMT -5
Realistically though, there is no such thing as an official chart.
|
|
Player211
7x Platinum Member
Joined: June 2007
Posts: 7,664
|
Post by Player211 on Aug 25, 2007 12:35:47 GMT -5
Mediatraffic is FAR from official. It's just some random guy doing estimates. ReallY? I always thought it was 100% accurate.
|
|
zago
Gold Member
Joined: September 2006
Posts: 978
|
Post by zago on Aug 25, 2007 13:54:58 GMT -5
Mediatraffic is FAR from official. It's just some random guy doing estimates. ReallY? I always thought it was 100% accurate. everybody knows that isn't official, but is the best way (at least considering only weeks in top40..) to have an idea of albums sales worldwide.
|
|
bogglethemind
Platinum Member
Joined: September 2005
Posts: 1,864
|
Post by bogglethemind on Aug 25, 2007 15:37:31 GMT -5
You shouldn't change estimates for JUST Justin and Nelly but keep everyone else the same. That makes no sense because then there's no consistency. If it's off for them, it's off for all. I think you should just keep doing what you were doing.
By the way, which article are you referencing? Because I just saw an article that said FS/LS was almost at 8 million worldwide.
|
|
Acid Eyes
Diamond Member
Joined: June 2007
Posts: 10,910
|
Post by Acid Eyes on Aug 25, 2007 17:12:01 GMT -5
^Agreed.
While UWC might not be an official chart, I doubt the people behind the chart specifically inflated the sales for Nelly and Justin.
|
|
slirk
Charting
Joined: April 2007
Posts: 243
|
Post by slirk on Aug 26, 2007 0:00:54 GMT -5
I reckon the labels estimates are full of crap - 'loose' has been certified triple platinum by mediatraffic for the past 10 weeks and has sold much more then 259,000 in those 10 weeks. It's been near 100k for most of those weeks. You realize Mediatraffic isn't an official chart, right? I always thought it was 100% accurate...There goes my theory..
|
|
slirk
Charting
Joined: April 2007
Posts: 243
|
Post by slirk on Aug 26, 2007 0:01:51 GMT -5
Is worldwidealbums.tk more accurate then mediatraffic?
|
|
|
Post by itsbeenaweek on Aug 26, 2007 0:39:59 GMT -5
Is worldwidealbums.tk more accurate then mediatraffic? Nope.
|
|
zago
Gold Member
Joined: September 2006
Posts: 978
|
Post by zago on Aug 26, 2007 6:09:51 GMT -5
^Agreed. While UWC might not be an official chart, I doubt the people behind the chart specifically inflated the sales for Nelly and Justin. no, is possible that their estimations have some errors that could advantaje some albums instead of others. for example if their over estimated the position #10 on german chart (but estimate good postion #9 an #11), an album that spent a lot of week at position #10 will be overstimate, an album that spent a lot of week at positions #9 and #11 will be well estimated. or is also possible that they tend to overstimate some top 10 charts, so albums like nelly furtado or JT that spent a lot of week in high positions will result overstimated. i've doubt too, but i look the results..for example the Rhcp or HSM data is near to the real data for sure, NF and JF always sound strange, as I say before for example NF is : 2mUSA,not yet 3m in Europe,500-600k canada,quite good in South america and australia, but for example in Japan have really ugly sales..so the total is more possible around 6,2-6,7. the same for JT, yes is 3,5m only in USA, but is only aorund 2m in Europe, 300k in Canada, good in oceania,but under 100k in Japan.. how could that 2 albums be over 7m..almost 8?
|
|
zago
Gold Member
Joined: September 2006
Posts: 978
|
Post by zago on Aug 26, 2007 6:12:55 GMT -5
Is worldwidealbums.tk more accurate then mediatraffic? Nope. I use the same data for weeks in top 40..but then continue it. for example for mediatraffic Paramore album have a total of 37.000 (1 week in chart), from my site is 217.000... take your conclusions
|
|
bogglethemind
Platinum Member
Joined: September 2005
Posts: 1,864
|
Post by bogglethemind on Aug 27, 2007 14:20:02 GMT -5
I'm still wondering what your source for Justin and Nelly is. Do you have a link to an article?
|
|
zago
Gold Member
Joined: September 2006
Posts: 978
|
Post by zago on Aug 27, 2007 19:11:39 GMT -5
|
|
bogglethemind
Platinum Member
Joined: September 2005
Posts: 1,864
|
Post by bogglethemind on Aug 27, 2007 21:08:45 GMT -5
So you have no source for Justin but some random poster on UKMIX? His figures weren't even close for Nelly. How does that make him reliable?
|
|
|
Post by 455555 on Aug 27, 2007 21:12:52 GMT -5
I don't see how it's possible for Nelly to have sold anything more than 6M. It's just foolish for anyone to think she's higher than that.
|
|
Acid Eyes
Diamond Member
Joined: June 2007
Posts: 10,910
|
Post by Acid Eyes on Aug 27, 2007 22:48:12 GMT -5
She sold 4.1 million in her four biggest markets (2 million US, 800k UK, 800k Germany, and 500k Canada). I know the album charted in at least 30 countries. Even if the album only sold an average of 100k in each of the remaining 26 countries, that's 6.7 million right there.
Again, I totally understand that the UWC is not 100% accurate, but all the albums on that chart would face the same margin of error.
|
|
|
Post by 455555 on Aug 27, 2007 23:14:20 GMT -5
It sold 2M in the US and 3M in Europe [I'm trusting you Nelly fans, even though it's only certified 2xp], and 500k in Canada.
That's 5.5M. Just because it charted in 30 countries, you can't just assume it sold 100k in each country. Sales in South America are virtually non-existant these days. And I know that Nelly tanked in Asia, where sales aren't even that big to begin with besides Japan where she is a total bomb.
So what's left? Australia? I'm not sure how much she's sold there but at most it could push her to 6M.
And I agree that all albums on that chart are inflated but Nelly's numbers are just outrageous.
|
|
Acid Eyes
Diamond Member
Joined: June 2007
Posts: 10,910
|
Post by Acid Eyes on Aug 27, 2007 23:28:06 GMT -5
Is Russia included as part of Europe? If not, that's another 150k. 140k in Australia. 50k South Africa. 50k Mexico. 30k New Zealand. And it sold something in Japan and Taiwan. That's 6 million, without any South American countries considered.
|
|
|
Post by 455555 on Aug 27, 2007 23:32:10 GMT -5
But even if it does add to 6M, it'll be maybe 6.2M with South American countries and that too is being generous.
6.2M is farrr off from the 7.7M that Mediatraffic suggests.
|
|
|
Post by 455555 on Aug 27, 2007 23:34:57 GMT -5
Oh and the 6.2M that we've come up with is basically shipments, while the 7.7M mediatraffic says is supposedly actual sales.
|
|
Acid Eyes
Diamond Member
Joined: June 2007
Posts: 10,910
|
Post by Acid Eyes on Aug 27, 2007 23:44:56 GMT -5
I never go by the 7.5% inclusion that a lot of sites add to Media Traffic's sales. Just because MT only covers 92.5% of the world's sales does not mean albums are selling at the same rate in the excluded countries. MT has its sales around 7.1 million. MT also covers 65 different countries. Sure, we have the sales from major countries, but what about Sri Lanka? Philippines? Venezuela?
|
|
|
Post by 455555 on Aug 27, 2007 23:56:01 GMT -5
Sri Lanka? Are you shittin me?
Fine. Let's add another 679 copies.
Like I said before, sales are DEAD in those places. I know that Platinum in the Philipines is like 5000. And Nelly never shows up on those charts anyway. She is NOT a superstar outside NA and Europe. Period.
I'd say her shipments are at 6.5M MAX. You're kidding yourself if you think it's more than that.
|
|