Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:14:22 GMT -5
and why should we believe cynthia, landmarx, drag, max, or icant just because of a role claim? popstop you have reasoning other than roleclaim so ok that makes more sense. your logic is nonexistant. well obviously you should believe me! no seriously though i'm roleclaiming for TWO people here, i would think it would be a really bad scum move to do that b/c if whoever we lynch is town you guys are going to be looking at both of us on D3 anyway. i'm willing to believe drag but admittedly this is probably in comparison to max and because i can't really think of anyone drag has created any kind of link to. max's safe claim is...well, really safe. it could be true but it's also an easy copout now that an independent is dead; he can always say that he's detecting nothing now and it must be because jback is gone. the title sounds like a Kunt-inspired title though so who knows. icant, i am willing to believe him because he seems like he's not fully aware of how to play the game but he could be scum bluffing. so basically, who knows. maybe they're all town and we should move to someone else yet again. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:18:52 GMT -5
so basically, who knows. maybe they're all town and we should move to someone else yet again. I honestly think that would be best. We need to put pressure on someone who has been just browsing the thread and not really saying anything. Rule #1 : is that you always have to take a stance Rule #2: have solid reasoning to back it up Rule #3: always have your own opinions, no parroting Basically if you're responsible for at least 2 of the above, you're scum in my eyes. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:20:26 GMT -5
so basically, who knows. maybe they're all town and we should move to someone else yet again. I honestly think that would be best. We need to put pressure on someone who has been just browsing the thread and not really saying anything. Rule #1 : is that you always have to take a stance Rule #2: have solid reasoning to back it up Rule #3: always have your own opinions, no parroting Basically if you're responsible for at least 2 of the above, you're scum in my eyes. This is all very true |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:21:29 GMT -5
wait so if i'm not hated what the hell am i? just a dummy who can get lynched with one less vote? boo MAX READ OMG - when the votes shifted so quickly from Landmarx did it not cross your mind to ask why? If I were in your shoes, hadn't seen a post where someone was claiming the guy at L-1 was town, and then suddenly saw a bunch of votes shifting my way, I would be asking what happened. You could chalk it up to just not paying attention but I dunno, that seems like a convenient oversight and especially since you were so anxious to get Landmarx's lynch out the way. idgi I already had a few votes on me as it is and the reasoning for it was probably justified (the annoying 'bandwagon' thing). Plus, icant has legitimately been bandwagoning (I personally pass that off as newbie actions tbh) so that's a few extra votes in my direction. what i mean is, you were the one who put landmarx at L-1, and you were quite anxious for someone to hammer. so when no one hammered, and in fact people started unvoting landmarx and moving their votes to you, that should have set off bells (assuming you didn't see my post where i claimed town for both landmarx and myself), but for some reason it didn't. if you're really town that means you're just really bad at paying attention, in which case i am inordinately irked because it makes you look scummier than what you really are. i will say that being able to name such a specific role title like that leans in your favor because scum did not receive safe claims, and the title really fits the flavor of the game. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:21:42 GMT -5
Codex and Lahey are my top suspects now
Codex:
Votes for me
Checks in the thread very briefly
Hasn't really done much analysis
Is very intent on getting me out
Lahey
Quiter than usual
Has his eyes on Landmarx and I
Hasn't really taken many stances
and I'm keeping my eyes on Zebra and Ginger more now.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:21:46 GMT -5
and why should we believe cynthia, landmarx, drag, max, or icant just because of a role claim? popstop you have reasoning other than roleclaim so ok that makes more sense. your logic is nonexistant. well obviously you should believe me! no seriously though i'm roleclaiming for TWO people here, i would think it would be a really bad scum move to do that b/c if whoever we lynch is town you guys are going to be looking at both of us on D3 anyway. i'm willing to believe drag but admittedly this is probably in comparison to max and because i can't really think of anyone drag has created any kind of link to. max's safe claim is...well, really safe. it could be true but it's also an easy copout now that an independent is dead; he can always say that he's detecting nothing now and it must be because jback is gone. the title sounds like a Kunt-inspired title though so who knows. icant, i am willing to believe him because he seems like he's not fully aware of how to play the game but he could be scum bluffing.so basically, who knows. maybe they're all town and we should move to someone else yet again. Lol, do you think I am experienced enough to scum bluff? You saw what happened last time, right? |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:23:04 GMT -5
ok so i have been procrastinating on this paper ALL night and it's due tomorrow so i'm going to leave for real now
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:23:46 GMT -5
ok so i have been procrastinating on this paper ALL night and it's due tomorrow so i'm going to leave for real now Bye. Will you be able to pop in tomorrow al all if need me? |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:25:19 GMT -5
ok so i have been procrastinating on this paper ALL night and it's due tomorrow so i'm going to leave for real now wait, you have school still? It's July. you're probably from the Southern Hemishphere then, huh. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:26:30 GMT -5
Vote: Codex
sort of a placeholder vote while I'm gone but the kind of placeholder vote that i wouldn't be too bothered if he ends up being lynched before i post again. i don't really have a reason other than what you (Drag) just said so i'm admittedly piggybacking. but i don't usually jump on piggybacking as a scum tell so i'm ok with that.
oh and to clarify yes i was agreeing with your list, Drag
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:26:50 GMT -5
#Mod: Cynthia is lynched when she reaches the same threshold as everyone else. It was literally a typo I forgot to remove from an older draft of the PM.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:27:41 GMT -5
Note to self: stop liking so many posts.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:27:47 GMT -5
ok so i have been procrastinating on this paper ALL night and it's due tomorrow so i'm going to leave for real now Bye. Will you be able to pop in tomorrow al all if need me? yes, tomorrow afternoon (like 4-5 pm CST) ok so i have been procrastinating on this paper ALL night and it's due tomorrow so i'm going to leave for real now wait, you have school still? It's July. you're probably from the Southern Hemishphere then, huh. no, actually, i've been taking summer classes |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:28:08 GMT -5
#Mod: Cynthia is lynched when she reaches the same threshold as everyone else. It was literally a typo I forgot to remove from an older draft of the PM. oh ffs |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:29:00 GMT -5
i was wondering why you forgot to include the word hated in my title though, so that explains that.
OK I MEAN IT I'M GOING TO WRITE THIS STUPID PAPER NOW
|
|
|
|
Post by Rose "Payola" Nylund on Jul 9, 2014 23:30:53 GMT -5
wait so if i'm not hated what the hell am i? just a dummy who can get lynched with one less vote? boo idgi I already had a few votes on me as it is and the reasoning for it was probably justified (the annoying 'bandwagon' thing). Plus, icant has legitimately been bandwagoning (I personally pass that off as newbie actions tbh) so that's a few extra votes in my direction. what i mean is, you were the one who put landmarx at L-1, and you were quite anxious for someone to hammer. so when no one hammered, and in fact people started unvoting landmarx and moving their votes to you, that should have set off bells (assuming you didn't see my post where i claimed town for both landmarx and myself), but for some reason it didn't. if you're really town that means you're just really bad at paying attention, in which case i am inordinately irked because it makes you look scummier than what you really are. i will say that being able to name such a specific role title like that leans in your favor because scum did not receive safe claims, and the title really fits the flavor of the game. No, I actually missed that post the first time around... I never claimed to be good at attention to detail...  |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:38:53 GMT -5
Since kunt is probably drunk I wanted to put an updated post count:
Codex: 2 (Drag, Cynthia)
Drag: 3 (Codex, Landmarx, josh)
Landmarx: 3 (Ginger Spice, Lahey, Max)
Max: 3 (popstop, Zebra, icant)
It takes 6 to lynch.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:42:50 GMT -5
A question for Rose "Payola" Nylund: do you believe cynthia's landmarx claim and now that we got everything out in the open, who do you feel is most likely scum? @icantthinkofaname do you believe max's role claim? The reason I ask is since your vote is still on him. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:44:56 GMT -5
A question for Rose "Payola" Nylund: do you believe cynthia's landmarx claim and now that we got everything out in the open, who do you feel is most likely scum? @icantthinkofaname do you believe max's role claim? The reason I ask is since your vote is still on him. Yes I believe his claim. I legit forgot I still had my vote on him. Unvote: MaxTime to think again. |
|
|
|
Post by Rose "Payola" Nylund on Jul 9, 2014 23:51:17 GMT -5
A question for Rose "Payola" Nylund: do you believe cynthia's landmarx claim and now that we got everything out in the open, who do you feel is most likely scum? I'm not sure. I mean, it could be cover and they both could be scum and with Landmarx's inactivity, Cynthia could just be using this to cover for him. And I think she said if we lynch Landmarx, she's dead too? But it doesn't work the other way around. If it's not true, it's a good story. But I've no reason to doubt it at this point so for now, I'll say she's more likely town. Most likely scum I still feel you're the most likely based on active players but I'm stilling thinking the majority of the faction probably lie in the inactive people. Nobody else has really done anything particularly suspicious. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2014 23:53:25 GMT -5
#Mod: I'm totally sober.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2014 0:50:18 GMT -5
Codex has been in the gaming section but he hasn't posted in here hmmmmm.... 
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2014 1:02:21 GMT -5
Vote: Max
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2014 1:04:37 GMT -5
josh get in here and hammer him already
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2014 1:06:22 GMT -5
josh get in here and hammer him already you're awfully hasty? what's your reasoning for your vote? |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2014 1:07:03 GMT -5
Max is now at L-2 Codex. Try again boo.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2014 1:07:42 GMT -5
actually Vote: Landmarx cause he's more useless than me
|
|
|
|
Post by Rose "Payola" Nylund on Jul 10, 2014 1:09:15 GMT -5
Well that's rather strange.
Vote: Codex tbh because wtf was that?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2014 1:30:40 GMT -5
I support just moving votes to Landmarx, to be honest. . WTF, vote: LandmarxL-1 someone hammer clockedT let's just lynch Landmarx, I can't find the cynthia claim y'all are talking about |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2014 1:31:35 GMT -5
you did the same thing as me and are calling me out for it
Vote: Max
this was my plan all along to prove Max is scum
|
|
