missgenericnickname
2x Platinum Member
Probably watching YouTube or some other bull
Joined: December 2015
Posts: 2,097
|
Post by missgenericnickname on Jan 30, 2016 22:44:15 GMT -5
I have new ones
-I think that Work is going to screw over pretty much every single good song on the Hot 100 for the next 2-3 months -Most songs featuring Drake should have been solo for him only(only regarding 2015) -Silento sort of screwed over Desserts chances of getting high on charts -Jess Glyne is horrible(I don't know if I put that already) -Not that they're good,but I don't hate IHeartMemphis,Future or Young Thug -Marvin Gayes family&the lawsuits.....Echh
|
|
redrooster
New Member
Joined: June 2015
Posts: 437
|
Post by redrooster on Jan 31, 2016 18:43:02 GMT -5
I have new ones -I think that Work is going to screw over pretty much every single good song on the Hot 100 for the next 2-3 months -Most songs featuring Drake should have been solo for him only(only regarding 2015) -Silento sort of screwed over Desserts chances of getting high on charts -Jess Glyne is horrible(I don't know if I put that already) -Not that they're good,but I don't hate IHeartMemphis,Future or Young Thug -Marvin Gayes family&the lawsuits.....Echh Work won't go to #1 thanks to When We Were Young
|
|
missgenericnickname
2x Platinum Member
Probably watching YouTube or some other bull
Joined: December 2015
Posts: 2,097
|
Post by missgenericnickname on Jan 31, 2016 20:55:15 GMT -5
I have new ones -I think that Work is going to screw over pretty much every single good song on the Hot 100 for the next 2-3 months -Most songs featuring Drake should have been solo for him only(only regarding 2015) -Silento sort of screwed over Desserts chances of getting high on charts -Jess Glyne is horrible(I don't know if I put that already) -Not that they're good,but I don't hate IHeartMemphis,Future or Young Thug -Marvin Gayes family&the lawsuits.....Echh Work won't go to #1 thanks to When We Were Young I thought that was supposed to be slowing down?Well that's good at least
|
|
missgenericnickname
2x Platinum Member
Probably watching YouTube or some other bull
Joined: December 2015
Posts: 2,097
|
Post by missgenericnickname on Jan 31, 2016 21:13:25 GMT -5
Got some other ones
-Grease isn't bad,but when I watched it for the first time this past summer,I was disappointed -Dare I say so far I like the live version of Grease EDIT:-There is an unnecessary amount of hate for the live version when it was great -_-
|
|
frenchfry
Gold Member
Joined: August 2014
Posts: 564
|
Post by frenchfry on Feb 1, 2016 0:50:57 GMT -5
"Thinking of you" is definitely Katy Perry's best single.
Also, unrelated, but George Michael's career should have lasted a lot longer in the US
|
|
redrooster
New Member
Joined: June 2015
Posts: 437
|
Post by redrooster on Feb 1, 2016 19:31:35 GMT -5
Work won't go to #1 thanks to When We Were Young I thought that was supposed to be slowing down?Well that's good at least Dude, it's at #29 on tomorrow's chart and it's an ALBUM TRACK with no promotion or streaming.
|
|
|
Post by Devil Marlena Nylund on Feb 1, 2016 19:43:00 GMT -5
Apparently thinking of When We Were Young as a single is an unpopular opinion too.
|
|
redrooster
New Member
Joined: June 2015
Posts: 437
|
Post by redrooster on Feb 1, 2016 21:11:52 GMT -5
Apparently thinking of When We Were Young as a single is an unpopular opinion too. It's not an opinion. Go to that song's Wikipedia page and scroll down to its "Release History." It's only a single in Italy.
|
|
missgenericnickname
2x Platinum Member
Probably watching YouTube or some other bull
Joined: December 2015
Posts: 2,097
|
Post by missgenericnickname on Feb 2, 2016 0:02:43 GMT -5
Apparently thinking of When We Were Young as a single is an unpopular opinion too. Wait.Who said that?
|
|
YourFaveIsAFlop
5x Platinum Member
Catch me in the fridge, right where the ice be
Joined: April 2014
Posts: 5,471
|
Post by YourFaveIsAFlop on Feb 5, 2016 21:26:33 GMT -5
Apparently thinking of When We Were Young as a single is an unpopular opinion too. It's not an opinion. Go to that song's Wikipedia page and scroll down to its "Release History." It's only a single in Italy. Yes, a pop song's page on Wikipedia is certainly the final arbiter of everything... It was most definitely serviced to CHR several weeks ago and is on all steaming services so yes it is and always has been the second single.
|
|
redrooster
New Member
Joined: June 2015
Posts: 437
|
Post by redrooster on Feb 5, 2016 23:13:35 GMT -5
It's not an opinion. Go to that song's Wikipedia page and scroll down to its "Release History." It's only a single in Italy. Yes, a pop song's page on Wikipedia is certainly the final arbiter of everything... It was most definitely serviced to CHR several weeks ago and is on all steaming services so yes it is and always has been the second single. Yes it is the final arbiter. Radio is still paying more attention to Hello but that's probably going to change soon. It was just released to streaming services today. Confirming that it will be the second single isn't the same as actually releasing it as a single. All that means is they told us it will be released as a single at some point in the future. Prior to today it was just an album track with no promo or streaming. With that in mind, it's crazy that it's at #29 in its tenth week on the chart.
|
|
Az Paynter
Diamond Member
On Dsico's Block Listβ’
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 110,672
|
Post by Az Paynter on Feb 6, 2016 4:18:02 GMT -5
#FacePalm
Wikipedia should NEVER be your final destination for proof/confirmation of anything because it is so easy for someone to edit in false information either out of ignorance or just to flat-out troll people.
You absolutely can NOT say 'When We Were Young' is not a single at this point just because it's not listed as such on Wikipedia. You've got plenty of other evidence disseminated directly from the source (ie. Adele's label). You've got the Spotify release, you've got the stand-alone single release, there is a video coming. Point blank, it's a single, and screw what Wikipedia does or doesn't say about the matter.
|
|
redrooster
New Member
Joined: June 2015
Posts: 437
|
Post by redrooster on Feb 6, 2016 13:34:22 GMT -5
#FacePalm Wikipedia should NEVER be your final destination for proof/confirmation of anything because it is so easy for someone to edit in false information either out of ignorance or just to flat-out troll people. You absolutely can NOT say 'When We Were Young' is not a single at this point just because it's not listed as such on Wikipedia. You've got plenty of other evidence disseminated directly from the source (ie. Adele's label). You've got the Spotify release, you've got the stand-alone single release, there is a video coming. Point blank, it's a single, and screw what Wikipedia does or doesn't say about the matter. Yes you can edit in false information but Wikipedia's Skynet systems will catch and edit it back within like 2 minutes. They want to be accurate and they do a good job. Trust me, I know. I looked at its edit history and someone kept making joke edits and it kept getting reverted almost immediately and then they blocked the guy who kept making the edits. It's more reliable than you'd think. According to Wikipedia and the article I will link to below, When We Were Young was officially released as a single worldwide YESTERDAY. The streaming week runs from Friday to Thursday, so you will see the effects of this on the Feb 27th chart. www.billboard.com/articles/news/6866985/adele-when-we-were-young-single-childhood-photoOnce again, announcing it as the second single =/= releasing it as the second single. Adele could announce the order of all the rest of the singles off 25 and they would still all be album tracks until they were serviced to radio AND released to streaming services such as Spotify. Until just yesterday, WWWY was in the same situation as every song off 25 not named Hello yet it was still at #29 on the Hot 100. That is pretty crazy right there.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2016 0:33:36 GMT -5
-Liked Can't Remember To Forget You over Beautiful Liar, both are really really good though -Majority of Hot 100 2015 #1 songs I didn't like and none except The Hills were faveds of 2015 -Troye Sivan is overall kinda generic, same problem with Halsey -Never have been a fan of any Shawn Mendes songs yet
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2016 0:35:36 GMT -5
#nevertrustWiki
|
|
|
Post by Daryl the Beryl on Feb 7, 2016 0:48:59 GMT -5
Pageant Material > Traveller I would like to take this back now...
|
|
Mr. Thonk Eyes
4x Platinum Member
The great Mr. Eyes
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 4,614
|
Post by Mr. Thonk Eyes on Feb 7, 2016 1:03:22 GMT -5
I don't actually think that many people would disagree with you on this one, Jake.
|
|
π
³π
Έππ
²π
Ύ
Diamond Member
Banned
I will beach both of you off at the same time!
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 69,123
|
Post by π
³π
Έππ
²π
Ύ on Feb 7, 2016 3:09:10 GMT -5
Ratchet Beyonce is far more exciting than Becky Beyonce.
|
|
redrooster
New Member
Joined: June 2015
Posts: 437
|
Post by redrooster on Feb 7, 2016 12:31:51 GMT -5
Hah! You guys want When We Were Young to flop so badly. Just wait. Hurricane Adele is coming for your faves.
|
|
|
Post by Devil Marlena Nylund on Feb 7, 2016 12:44:14 GMT -5
Wikipedia is more reliable as a source than those hundreds of dollars worth of Encyclopedias gathering dust in the basement.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2016 13:48:33 GMT -5
Hah! You guys want When We Were Young to flop so badly. Just wait. Hurricane Adele is coming for your faves. I'm not rooting for it to flop.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2016 13:49:46 GMT -5
Wikipedia is more reliable as a source than those hundreds of dollars worth of Encyclopedias gathering dust in the basement. And yet it's against the rules to use as a source in papers and reports.
|
|
|
Post by Devil Marlena Nylund on Feb 7, 2016 14:33:50 GMT -5
Wikipedia is more reliable as a source than those hundreds of dollars worth of Encyclopedias gathering dust in the basement. And yet it's against the rules to use as a source in papers and reports. I'm not sure if you're doubting my post because of it not being allowed to be a citable source for academic papers. It's true it is easy to manipulate but Wikipedia also has dozens of people who are presumed experts on a particular topic who can edit inaccurate information when they come across it, unlike old style encyclopedias which, once printed, were taken as fact regardless of whether there were errors or not. It stuck until the next edition but no one is going to buy the next edition. Wiki also requires sources. I found it very helpful when writing papers because it would lead me to useful sources. It's all in knowing how to use it to get the most out of it.
|
|
YourFaveIsAFlop
5x Platinum Member
Catch me in the fridge, right where the ice be
Joined: April 2014
Posts: 5,471
|
Post by YourFaveIsAFlop on Feb 7, 2016 19:39:27 GMT -5
The Weeknd's album wasn't all that good, the only reason I can see for its success was the Beckys of the world thinking he's edgy
|
|
missgenericnickname
2x Platinum Member
Probably watching YouTube or some other bull
Joined: December 2015
Posts: 2,097
|
Post by missgenericnickname on Feb 7, 2016 22:04:45 GMT -5
-The hate towards Beyonce right now is really unnecessary
|
|
redrooster
New Member
Joined: June 2015
Posts: 437
|
Post by redrooster on Feb 7, 2016 23:27:04 GMT -5
And yet it's against the rules to use as a source in papers and reports. I'm not sure if you're doubting my post because of it not being allowed to be a citable source for academic papers. It's true it is easy to manipulate but Wikipedia also has dozens of people who are presumed experts on a particular topic who can edit inaccurate information when they come across it, unlike old style encyclopedias which, once printed, were taken as fact regardless of whether there were errors or not. It stuck until the next edition but no one is going to buy the next edition. Wiki also requires sources. I found it very helpful when writing papers because it would lead me to useful sources. It's all in knowing how to use it to get the most out of it. And all the junk edits get reverted within minutes. I've tested it. Plus they have sources that indicate that WWWY was not released as a single until last Friday.
|
|
The Upper Hand
3x Platinum Member
Dupe
Joined: March 2012
Posts: 3,188
|
Post by The Upper Hand on Feb 8, 2016 0:46:05 GMT -5
BeyoncΓ© and Rihanna should release straightforward Pop/R&B songs again.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2016 9:39:42 GMT -5
Beyonce is at her worst point musically right now. 7/11 is the worst song she ever made in her entire career and I didn't like any of the singles she released from her last album (though there's a few album songs I thought were good). I thought her new song she performed at the Super Bowl was terrible, she needs to stop trying to rap, it's not good. I also feel like she is wasting her talents on songs like these.
|
|
ml7673
New Member
Dupe
Joined: August 2015
Posts: 63
|
Post by ml7673 on Feb 11, 2016 4:35:59 GMT -5
I personally think Uptown Funk is extremely overrated
|
|
missgenericnickname
2x Platinum Member
Probably watching YouTube or some other bull
Joined: December 2015
Posts: 2,097
|
Post by missgenericnickname on Feb 13, 2016 18:55:55 GMT -5
-All of the people saying that "Taylor made Kanye famous"& "How dare he even make music" automatically makes me on Kanyes side
|
|