wavey.
Moderator
Look...
Positive Vibes🙏🏾❤
Joined: August 2006
Posts: 43,658
Pronouns: He/Him
Staff
|
Post by wavey. on Dec 21, 2020 15:15:40 GMT -5
how is dynamite back in the top 10 again ;-; Holiday Remix.
|
|
jayhawk1117
2x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2013
Posts: 2,758
|
Post by jayhawk1117 on Dec 21, 2020 15:16:15 GMT -5
Obviously anyone is allowed to employ tactics to go/stay #1, and Mariah knows a few tricks herself from a few years ago But what is another week at #1 for AIWFCIY's success? Mariah probably doesn't even care, and rightfully so. I see your point. But to some people additional weeks at #1 is also just as nice to celebrate as going #1 the first time. Seen recently with Taylor herself doing the tactics/new versions against competition in further weeks after Folklore debuted #1 to get additional weeks atop. Mariah is past the point of strongly following her charting I would guess, and AIWFCIY hitting #1 for the first time was the final icing on the cake for the song to her. yeah until Mariah is close to the all time record, she won't have to do promo lol
|
|
Choco
Diamond Member
james dean daydream
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 27,977
My Charts
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by Choco on Dec 21, 2020 15:18:25 GMT -5
90s Mariah would've never let a #1 slip away by 2 points. Why wouldn't she let it slip away now? The song is a surefire hit with plenty of weeks at #1 (and probably many more to come). Pushing tactics to prevent it from falling from #1 would just have been petty. But she was straight up savage (and even petty sometimes) in how she worked the chart tactics back in the day. With her legacy secure now, I don't think she even cares for this particular chartweek, back in the day she would have discounted, sold signed copies and even done radio shows for promo.
|
|
deepston
5x Platinum Member
Nightmare Dressed Like a Kitty
just like a folk song, our love will be passed on
Joined: August 2017
Posts: 5,661
|
Post by deepston on Dec 21, 2020 15:21:59 GMT -5
Why wouldn't she let it slip away now? The song is a surefire hit with plenty of weeks at #1 (and probably many more to come). Pushing tactics to prevent it from falling from #1 would just have been petty. But she was straight up savage (and even petty sometimes) in how she worked the chart tactics back in the day. With her legacy secure now, I don't think she even cares for this particular chartweek, back in the day she would have discounted, sold signed copies and even done radio shows for promo. In my opinion using some sort of tactic to fend off Taylor for an extra week at #1 would have just tarnished this legacy. The song will return to #1 next week and collect its annual 2/3 weeks at #1 until God knows when anyways
|
|
renfield75
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 1,644
|
Post by renfield75 on Dec 21, 2020 15:21:59 GMT -5
So were there 20 or 21 number one hits this year? Billboard carefully worded it as 20 to "spend their first week at number one", but since AIWFCIY is technically in a separate chart run from last year it should be 21, yes? "The Twist" counted as a separate number one in 1962.
|
|
Choco
Diamond Member
james dean daydream
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 27,977
My Charts
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by Choco on Dec 21, 2020 15:27:17 GMT -5
So were there 20 or 21 number one hits this year? Billboard carefully worded it as 20 to "spend their first week at number one", but since AIWFCIY is technically in a separate chart run from last year it should be 21, yes? "The Twist" counted as a separate number one in 1962. Didn't it technically spend a week at #1 in a January week (according to the Billboard calendar). It should count as a returning #1 hit.
|
|
renfield75
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 1,644
|
Post by renfield75 on Dec 21, 2020 15:28:36 GMT -5
So were there 20 or 21 number one hits this year? Billboard carefully worded it as 20 to "spend their first week at number one", but since AIWFCIY is technically in a separate chart run from last year it should be 21, yes? "The Twist" counted as a separate number one in 1962. Didn't it technically spend a week at #1 in a January week (according to the Billboard calendar). It should count as a returning #1 hit. It did, but that was an entirely separate chart run from the current one.
|
|
Gary
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2014
Posts: 45,890
|
Post by Gary on Dec 21, 2020 15:31:00 GMT -5
All statistics are depending on how you word it.
Mariah was #1 in chart weeks for both years and "charted in 3 decades" based on that. It is also a 2019 #1 because that is when it first hit
Willow is the 1115th #1 of the Hot 100 era if you count The Twist once but it had two chart runs.
Another fun example: The "Trollz" record for instance is the biggest drop from #1 to another position
All in the wording
|
|
iHype.
4x Platinum Member
Joined: October 2014
Posts: 4,714
|
Post by iHype. on Dec 21, 2020 15:33:59 GMT -5
Didn't it technically spend a week at #1 in a January week (according to the Billboard calendar). It should count as a returning #1 hit. It did, but that was an entirely separate chart run from the current one. It's definitely a weird situation since it was #1 in 2019, going into 2020, then went #1 again in 2020. Which is definitely what caused them to practically re-word the way they'd phrased 2020 #1's. I think it's debatable. It had a separate chart run this year, but also, say if "Life Goes On" fell off last week and BTS stans miraculously mass-bought and it returned on the charts at #1 this week I wouldn't count it as two separate #1s in 2020 either.
|
|
slw84
7x Platinum Member
I only tolerate legends
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 7,897
|
Post by slw84 on Dec 21, 2020 15:38:09 GMT -5
7th #1 for Taylor.
Sadly, Mariah misses out on a week but as long as Billboard doesn't change any rules to prevent Mariah for slowly reclaiming her time from Old town road then i guess it's all good
|
|
Gary
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2014
Posts: 45,890
|
Post by Gary on Dec 21, 2020 15:39:28 GMT -5
Not to worry I think counting Christmas songs as "popular" during Christmas season is here to stay.
|
|
atg
3x Platinum Member
Joined: April 2016
Posts: 3,004
|
Post by atg on Dec 21, 2020 15:43:22 GMT -5
The fact nobody here brought up "FRANCHISE" in the discussion of forgettable #1s this year. 😭 That one definitely takes the cake, I think. As you said, at least "TROLLZ", "Stuck With U", and "Life Goes On" had some controversy attached to them. Franchise is so forgettable as a #1, it doesn’t even make ‘forgotten’ lists
|
|
|
Post by Henry Suárez on Dec 21, 2020 15:44:49 GMT -5
|
|
slw84
7x Platinum Member
I only tolerate legends
Joined: August 2008
Posts: 7,897
|
Post by slw84 on Dec 21, 2020 15:45:08 GMT -5
Wow, 2 points difference according to TOTC Giving me behind-the-scenes political moves but it wouldn't be the first time.
|
|
gikem
3x Platinum Member
Joined: October 2020
Posts: 3,813
|
Post by gikem on Dec 21, 2020 15:45:39 GMT -5
28 new arrivals this week. That's one more than the week Drake's album Scorpion impacted the Hot 100. Crazy.
|
|
kimberly
Diamond Member
act i RENAISSANCE
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 11,930
My Charts
Pronouns: they/them
|
Post by kimberly on Dec 21, 2020 15:50:48 GMT -5
Another fun example: The "Trollz" record for instance is the biggest drop from #1 to another position
All in the wordingaaah, Gareth never misses
|
|
85la
3x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 3,916
|
Post by 85la on Dec 21, 2020 15:52:55 GMT -5
I feel like up to a certain point, if AIWFCIY keeps reaching #1 for too many years, there will be backlash, and many people, even her fans, will start getting tired of it, in terms of both the chart placement and the song itself. It will just get too bland and predictable with such chart domination, and will block many other songs from #1. Eventually, I wouldn't be surprised if her label even tries to mitigate its success for this reason, such as voluntarily forgoing points towards the charts. I know this sounds crazy and don't even know if it's possible, but it's a similar thing with awards like the Grammy's or Emmy's, how on occasion, certain artists don't submit their work because they don't want to dominate and take away from other deserving artists too much.
More likely though, eventually sometime over the years it will decrease in popularity or consumption patterns or chart rules will change, in which it will slide lower and lower or eventually not chart at all. This is eventually what happened exactly to White Christmas - hard to believe that what just receives minor attention in recent years used to be the big Christmas hit for most of last century.
|
|
Gary
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2014
Posts: 45,890
|
Post by Gary on Dec 21, 2020 15:53:55 GMT -5
28 new arrivals this week. That's one more than the week Drake's album Scorpion impacted the Hot 100. Crazy. Will slow the upward movement of some of the Christmas songs but when most of the Taylor songs freefall next week, the Christmas songs will get one more week in the spotlights
|
|
Amnesiac
Platinum Member
Joined: November 2009
Posts: 1,683
|
Post by Amnesiac on Dec 21, 2020 15:59:19 GMT -5
Evermore charting all at once means Haim and The National have both made their first Hot 100 appearance. Haim have never even made the Bubbling Under chart before - not for "Forever" or "The Wire" or "Wan't You Back". It's less surprising to me that The National are making their Hot 100 debut, particularly because they didn't start charting on any of the three rock airplay charts (even Triple A!) until their seventh album.
|
|
renfield75
Platinum Member
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 1,644
|
Post by renfield75 on Dec 21, 2020 16:02:07 GMT -5
It did, but that was an entirely separate chart run from the current one. It's definitely a weird situation since it was #1 in 2019, going into 2020, then went #1 again in 2020. Which is definitely what caused them to practically re-word the way they'd phrased 2020 #1's. I think it's debatable. It had a separate chart run this year, but also, say if "Life Goes On" fell off last week and BTS stans miraculously mass-bought and it returned on the charts at #1 this week I wouldn't count it as two separate #1s in 2020 either. In that scenario I wouldn't count "Life Goes On" as a separate number one because it's still in the same promotional release cycle. If it became a TikTok hit and went to #1 next November I might consider it a different number one for 2021. Or, say "The Chipmunk Song" had a huge revival next Christmas and went to number one. Would it be considered a number one hit of 2021 or just a fifth week added to 1958? Christmas songs make for a lot of weird scenarios on the chart these days.
|
|
ry4n
7x Platinum Member
Joined: November 2014
Posts: 7,247
My Charts
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by ry4n on Dec 21, 2020 16:03:07 GMT -5
Most number one debuts:
Ariana Grande 5 Drake 3 Justin Bieber 3 Mariah Carey 3 Taylor Swift 3 Travis Scott 3
|
|
Gary
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2014
Posts: 45,890
|
Post by Gary on Dec 21, 2020 16:04:18 GMT -5
Or, say "The Chipmunk Song" had a huge revival next Christmas and went to number one. Would it be considered a number one hit of 2021 or just a fifth week added to 1958? . Both - all in the wording
|
|
ccchui
Charting
Joined: April 2008
Posts: 171
|
Post by ccchui on Dec 21, 2020 16:05:23 GMT -5
28 new arrivals this week. That's one more than the week Drake's album Scorpion impacted the Hot 100. Crazy. I think it is nice to see one of them is from Nat King Cole to debut another song in the chart.
|
|
Choco
Diamond Member
james dean daydream
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 27,977
My Charts
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by Choco on Dec 21, 2020 16:07:59 GMT -5
Tbh blocking Mariah next year is as easy as "BTS Xmas Single".
Imagine the mass buying.
Taylor did it this week and it wasn't even one of her strongest number one hits in terms of SPS.
|
|
Gary
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2014
Posts: 45,890
|
Post by Gary on Dec 21, 2020 16:10:30 GMT -5
From a market perspective, all the remixes being downloaded suggests to me that the digital single isn't quite dead yet and there is still a market for it. It is not really 100% streaming quite yet, people still buy stuff.
|
|
iHype.
4x Platinum Member
Joined: October 2014
Posts: 4,714
|
Post by iHype. on Dec 21, 2020 16:14:14 GMT -5
From a market perspective, all the remixes being downloaded suggests to me that the digital single isn't quite dead yet and there is still a market for it. It is not really 100% streaming quite yet, people still buy stuff. And the song will probably never even surpass 200k total pure sales seeing as it's possibly going to fall below 5k sales next week. We are in a time where songs are going Diamond off streams alone. Digital sales are practically a dead horse in comparison to streaming. Arguing over to the extent of how much they've eroded and how much further they can erode is rather semantics at this point.
|
|
Choco
Diamond Member
james dean daydream
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 27,977
My Charts
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by Choco on Dec 21, 2020 16:17:20 GMT -5
From a market perspective, all the remixes being downloaded suggests to me that the digital single isn't quite dead yet and there is still a market for it. It is not really 100% streaming quite yet, people still buy stuff. It's mostly just for chart manipulation though. There is no other reason for these people to mass-buy instead of mass-stream, if they really wanna play the track over and over again. If and when sales get nerfed to lower their impact on the Hot 100 these mass buying movements will die down, because it's not really about the product being bought, it's just to artificially drive up a peak position.
|
|
Gary
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2014
Posts: 45,890
|
Post by Gary on Dec 21, 2020 16:19:20 GMT -5
From a market perspective, all the remixes being downloaded suggests to me that the digital single isn't quite dead yet and there is still a market for it. It is not really 100% streaming quite yet, people still buy stuff. And the song will probably never even surpass 200k total pure sales seeing as it's possibly going to fall below 5k sales next week. We are in a time where songs are going Diamond off streams alone. Digital sales are practically a dead horse in comparison to streaming. Arguing over to the extent of how much they've eroded and how much further they can erode is rather semantics at this point. Wasn't trying to argue anything actually The point of my post was to point out people still download songs if there is enough interest in the song.
|
|
Soundcl🕤ck
Diamond Member
Joined: August 2017
Posts: 11,063
|
Post by Soundcl🕤ck on Dec 21, 2020 16:25:57 GMT -5
|
|
iHype.
4x Platinum Member
Joined: October 2014
Posts: 4,714
|
Post by iHype. on Dec 21, 2020 16:26:45 GMT -5
2020 Mid-Year Report:
TOP 10 DIGITAL SONG CONSUMPTION 1 “The Box” - 6.058 million (182k sales, 3% of total consumption) 2 “Life Is Good” - 4.248 million (145k sales, 3% of total consumption) 3 “Blinding Lights” - 3.748 million (372k sales, 10% of total consumption) 4 “Say So” - 2.677 million (217k sales, 8% of total consumption) 5."Dance Monkey” - 2.645 million (275k sales, 10% of total consumption) 6. “Savage” - 2.625 million (261k sales, 10% of total consumption) 7. "Don't Start Now” - 2.594 million (204k sales, 8% of total consumption) 8. "Circles” - 2.438 million (214k sales, 9% of total consumption) 9. “Rockstar” - 2.425 million (124k sales, 5% of total consumption) 10. “Roxanne” - 2.362 million (96k sales, 4% of total consumption)
And that's before they outruled the not-shipped-for-months bundles boosting some of these songs sales numbers lol. Let's see how lower sales are in the total consumption for hits a year from now.
Sales for songs are easily at early 2000s level at irrelevance. I think total digital sales will be the lowest since 2004.
|
|