Gary
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2014
Posts: 45,896
|
Post by Gary on Nov 7, 2021 13:15:59 GMT -5
General question if you stop listening to music because the artist was directly or indirectly responsible for a behavior or an act that is offensive to somebody - what's left? My take - unless the song itself drives you the listener to immoral behavior(which of course could happen but likely to a much smaller degree), then the song is innocent, even if the artist isn't. I will enjoy the music I enjoy and not worry about it, Well what's left is...you don't listen to their music. it's not that hard. To use an extreme example to make my point: I highly doubt the people who don't listen want to R. Kelly (like myself) are kicking themselves for doing so. There's thousands, if not millions of artists you could always listen to. Some people aren't comfortable listening to acts who've raped or killed or emotionally abused others, and some are content. Again, we all have different standards (especially if the artist is dead and can't actively gain any monetary compensation from consumption) but it's really not that painful to not want to support an artist after they're outted as being a POS. And I didn't even getting into artists that are actively spreading misinformation and conspiracies and harm with their music. My bad - I should have said "who is left?" not "what is left?" People in the public eye have lots of bad habits that are offensive to one person or another, much of which these days are captured by Twitter and anyone with a cell camera. I respect the desire of people to personally 'cancel' artists because they are in the news for a negative reason. If you 'cancel' an artist because you believe that by listening to a song you are supporting and taking responsibility for every aspect of the artists life - that is your choice. Others though like myself are in it for the music
|
|
Choco
Diamond Member
james dean daydream
Joined: February 2009
Posts: 27,985
My Charts
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by Choco on Nov 7, 2021 13:33:59 GMT -5
I promise y'all there are better acts out there than Travis Scott. You'll be fine not streaming him.
|
|
fridayteenage
5x Platinum Member
Shake it Off
Joined: April 2008
Posts: 5,493
|
Post by fridayteenage on Nov 7, 2021 13:34:35 GMT -5
yours by jin is #1 on itunes.
will it top sales this week, or does army not care about pushing the solo songs?
|
|
dremolus - solarpunk
Diamond Member
𝙁𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙋𝙖𝙡𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙋𝙃, 𝙎𝙩𝙤𝙥 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙐.𝙎. 𝙒𝙖𝙧 𝙈𝙖𝙘𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙚
Joined: August 2019
Posts: 13,326
My Reviews
Pronouns: (he/him/they)
|
Post by dremolus - solarpunk on Nov 7, 2021 13:39:13 GMT -5
Well what's left is...you don't listen to their music. it's not that hard. To use an extreme example to make my point: I highly doubt the people who don't listen want to R. Kelly (like myself) are kicking themselves for doing so. There's thousands, if not millions of artists you could always listen to. Some people aren't comfortable listening to acts who've raped or killed or emotionally abused others, and some are content. Again, we all have different standards (especially if the artist is dead and can't actively gain any monetary compensation from consumption) but it's really not that painful to not want to support an artist after they're outted as being a POS. And I didn't even getting into artists that are actively spreading misinformation and conspiracies and harm with their music. My bad - I should have said "who is left?" not "what is left?" People in the public eye have lots of bad habits that are offensive to one person or another, much of which these days are captured by Twitter and anyone with a cell camera. I respect the desire of people to personally 'cancel' artists because they are in the news for a negative reason. If you 'cancel' an artist because you believe that by listening to a song you are supporting and taking responsibility for every aspect of the artists life - that is your choice. Others though like myself are in it for the music Well the answer to who is left: as I keep saying, everyone has different standards. The point of these cancellations isnt to single out artists until we only listen to people who've never done a single bad thing, it's just everyone has their own big stances on morality and we try to limit those who cross that barrier. Everyone in the public eye may have "bad habits" but not all evils are equal. I doubt anyone would say being mean on Twitter is as cancelleable as coercing minors into having sex or emotionally abusing partners. Again, not trying to be smug or belittled on those who do seperate the art from the artist, I just hope I've made myself clearer
|
|
korbel16
Platinum Member
Joined: September 2017
Posts: 1,908
|
Post by korbel16 on Nov 7, 2021 13:40:42 GMT -5
I work with people who still refuse to not listen to r. Kelly and Tory lanez. U can’t stop people from listening to Travis if u tried cuz the fans are already Chaotic as u saw at the festival. So tragic
|
|
korbel16
Platinum Member
Joined: September 2017
Posts: 1,908
|
Post by korbel16 on Nov 7, 2021 13:42:14 GMT -5
Loved to see Happier Than Ever getting good radio updates. That song deserved top 10. feel like if she didn’t release 2 bland songs before the album, HTE coulda have debuted at number 1 🤷🏽♀️
|
|
|
Post by ontopofthis on Nov 7, 2021 13:45:24 GMT -5
Haven’t even bothered to listen to his new songs but it’s definitely obvious he will still have a huge following and his music will continue to chart high for a while. If someone does not want to listen because their personal stance then that’s fine but ultimately trying to convince/guilt others to also not listen will go nowhere. Everyone has their own personal limit on what will make them stop listening to music or supporting an artist (many people who won’t listen to Travis but will continue to stream songs Dr. Luke has involvement in for example). Every situation is complex and has dozens of factors which is why trying to pass your own personal assessment of how to go forward with consuming an artist as universally accepted goes nowhere. Chart wise… the new songs don’t appear to have any physical CDs available so far like Franchise/The Scotts/Highest in the Room. I don’t think it would be logical for his label to now release them directly following the drama either (not to mention they probably mostly wouldn’t even ship out in time at this point) so we can rule out another fluke #1 debut from him as of now. The fact of the matter is that the losers who are usually at the top of the internet whining about things are not why those people or things are successful in the first place. Listen to or do not listen to whatever you want, but people need to stop being obnoxious about it and need to stop trying impose their behaviors onto other people. That is why you are beginning to see see so much pushback about "cancel culture" and "wokeness." The people who are spearheading it are absolutely insufferable
|
|
|
Post by ontopofthis on Nov 7, 2021 13:46:45 GMT -5
I promise y'all there are better acts out there than Travis Scott. You'll be fine not streaming him. Why are you trying to control what random strangers are listening to?
|
|
|
Post by ontopofthis on Nov 7, 2021 13:49:22 GMT -5
It appears that the Post Malone song is not performing well anywhere
|
|
Gary
Diamond Member
Joined: January 2014
Posts: 45,896
|
Post by Gary on Nov 7, 2021 13:50:06 GMT -5
My bad - I should have said "who is left?" not "what is left?" People in the public eye have lots of bad habits that are offensive to one person or another, much of which these days are captured by Twitter and anyone with a cell camera. I respect the desire of people to personally 'cancel' artists because they are in the news for a negative reason. If you 'cancel' an artist because you believe that by listening to a song you are supporting and taking responsibility for every aspect of the artists life - that is your choice. Others though like myself are in it for the music Well the answer to who is left: as I keep saying, everyone has different standards. The point of these cancellations isnt to single out artists until we only listen to people who've never done a single bad thing, it's just everyone has their own big stances on morality and we try to limit those who cross that barrier. Everyone in the public eye may have "bad habits" but not all evils are equal. I doubt anyone would say being mean on Twitter is as cancelleable as coercing minors into having sex or emotionally abusing partners. Again, not trying to be smug or belittled on those who do seperate the art from the artist, I just hope I've made myself clearer I understand both sides of the picture. You keep talking evil and immorality. As a personal sign of not supporting that evil and morality of said artist in the news, you personally cancel the artist. I understand. I get it. I believe, in most cases, the song itself is innocent. The consumer of the song is responsible for their own behavior only, not the behavior and life choices of the artists that put the song out. The belief is that it is possible to support the songs without it being and equal show of support for evil and immorality. This is why you see <insert random artist hit by cancel culture> still popular. I also respect both sides and also would not try to judge one side or the other. SO I think we agree
|
|
dynamac
Charting
Joined: September 2017
Posts: 338
|
Post by dynamac on Nov 7, 2021 14:03:16 GMT -5
Me streaming Escape Plan will make Travis Scott a whopping $0.00437 per listen so I think any moral handwringing of “supporting the artist” or “giving them money” by streaming is pretty pointless.
Some people don’t feel comfortable listening to morally f**ked people, some people just like the songs regardless of context it’s as simple as that. None of these people will ever know we exist and are stars with more money than god so I don’t really see the point in policing their art.
|
|
enwhy
Gold Member
Joined: January 2021
Posts: 642
Pronouns: he/him
|
Post by enwhy on Nov 7, 2021 14:55:20 GMT -5
It appears that the Post Malone song is not performing well anywhere It's not doing #1 debut numbers, but I wouldn't say not performing well? I think it'll land in the top 10. #1 US Spotify (1.3M) #3 US iTunes (behind Adele + BTS) #28 US Apple Music (#9 excluding Summer Walker album bomb) On pace for ~20M Radio Audience + Top 20 on Pop radio by the end of the week
|
|
algo
Charting
the competition is getting serious
Joined: February 2021
Posts: 178
Pronouns: he/they
|
Post by algo on Nov 7, 2021 14:56:47 GMT -5
It appears that the Post Malone song is not performing well anywhere what are you talking about? it rose to #1 on spotify today, it's getting picked up fast by radio & is currently sitting at #4 on itunes
|
|
|
Post by nathanalbright on Nov 7, 2021 15:02:52 GMT -5
Some people have rather demanding standards of what it means to do well. If it doesn't beat Driver's License's numbers it's a flop.
|
|
JukeboxJacob
2x Platinum Member
Banned
another day another moment of cringe
Joined: November 2019
Posts: 2,472
|
Post by JukeboxJacob on Nov 7, 2021 15:22:29 GMT -5
I'm sure y'all ain't about conspiracies, but a satanist performing a song called "Escape Plan" while people are actually dying trying to escape is kinda sus
|
|
iHype.
4x Platinum Member
Joined: October 2014
Posts: 4,714
|
Post by iHype. on Nov 7, 2021 15:26:02 GMT -5
It is #1 on Spotify, but the numbers are pretty low. It's similar to how an album can be #1 but still have disappointing numbers.
It is just barely above "Industry Baby" on Spotify & Apple Music, and that song did 15 million audio streams last week. That means at the moment "One Right Now" is pacing around 15 million audio streams first week.
Even Take My Breath, Your Power, Motley Crew, and Bad Bunny's Yonaguni did more streams first week. For the #1 & #2 artist of 2020 year-end to collab and start out with lower numbers than those songs can ofcourse be pretty surprising to many people's standards.
|
|
|
Post by Baby Yoda Hot100Fan on Nov 7, 2021 16:01:21 GMT -5
|
|
mms82
Platinum Member
...
Joined: January 2019
Posts: 1,284
|
Post by mms82 on Nov 7, 2021 16:02:34 GMT -5
One right now is ''monster 2.0'' ..2 big pop stars failed to deliver and maybe it can have a top 10 debut ( thanks to radio support) but fall hard on the second week Is Mendes even considered a big pop star anymore? Either way, I think One Right Now will definitely fare a lot better than Monster. It has more casual replay value and a better sound for radio overall. Don't think it'll smash, but I can see it being a decent sized hit for sure. Shawn’s fall off was wild and so sudden- he had two #1 debuts blocked by OTR (and Señorita eventually got there) to not really being able to chart just over a year later
|
|
chanman
Gold Member
Joined: March 2018
Posts: 756
|
Post by chanman on Nov 7, 2021 16:22:24 GMT -5
It appears that the Post Malone song is not performing well anywhere I dont quite understand your post but care to explain! So far its doing fine on all 3 metrics .... And I like the song which is I think is quite better than each of the artists previous charted singles.... "Moth To A Flame" and "Motley Crue" ...the two Mott's
|
|
Normi
6x Platinum Member
Original Pop Flop Stan
probably high right now
Joined: February 2017
Posts: 6,931
|
Post by Normi on Nov 7, 2021 16:45:52 GMT -5
Post stays winning
|
|
NeRD
Diamond Member
RIHANNA NAVY
Joined: March 2010
Posts: 15,302
|
Post by NeRD on Nov 7, 2021 16:51:51 GMT -5
I didn't realize Travis' streaming power.
|
|
|
Post by ontopofthis on Nov 7, 2021 17:27:25 GMT -5
It appears that the Post Malone song is not performing well anywhere I dont quite understand your post but care to explain! So far its doing fine on all 3 metrics .... And I like the song which is I think is quite better than each of the artists previous charted singles.... "Moth To A Flame" and "Motley Crue" ...the two Mott's I am referring to the global Spotify performance. It is not putting up particularly strong numbers in any country
|
|
kindofbiased
Platinum Member
Rough surf on the coast
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,759
|
Post by kindofbiased on Nov 7, 2021 17:39:48 GMT -5
I don't know what this forum's standards are for hits anymore I cannot remember the last time a song went to #1 on Spotify and people responded to that with "hm. looks like it's flopping" (feels like this is the reaction to literally every new song that comes out too)
|
|
85la
3x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 3,919
|
Post by 85la on Nov 7, 2021 17:41:57 GMT -5
Me streaming Escape Plan will make Travis Scott a whopping $0.00437 per listen so I think any moral handwringing of “supporting the artist” or “giving them money” by streaming is pretty pointless. Some people don’t feel comfortable listening to morally f**ked people, some people just like the songs regardless of context it’s as simple as that. None of these people will ever know we exist and are stars with more money than god so I don’t really see the point in policing their art. This brings up a good point for people who can't always separate the art from the artist, because certainly there are different levels of financial compensation one gives an artist by listening to or supporting their music. Streaming a song, or downloading it illegally, will of course give them very little to no money, however purchasing their songs or albums, buying their merch/concert tickets, etc., will of course give them much more money that would keep their career going and would more likely enable them to continue whatever problematic behavior listeners have a problem with.
|
|
85la
3x Platinum Member
Joined: July 2007
Posts: 3,919
|
Post by 85la on Nov 7, 2021 18:44:18 GMT -5
|
|
iamsorare
Platinum Member
Banned
Joined: June 2020
Posts: 1,177
|
Post by iamsorare on Nov 7, 2021 19:03:49 GMT -5
I don't know what this forum's standards are for hits anymore I cannot remember the last time a song went to #1 on Spotify and people responded to that with "hm. looks like it's flopping" (feels like this is the reaction to literally every new song that comes out too) for example no one said that drivers licence was flopping or good for you was flopping or peaches was flopping,or stay was flopping.. they were legit hits with huge numbers..and it was impressive that a new artist like olivia did that or Bieber did that cause he had some underperform singles before.. post and weeknd are supposed to be huge pop stars ..#1 on TTH Spotify ,radio payola..the streaming numbers are low despite that it's #1 .. it's not something to be proud of..
|
|
|
Post by Baby Yoda Hot100Fan on Nov 7, 2021 19:40:11 GMT -5
In the Air Tonight in the top 10 of iTunes ...
|
|
Soundcl🕤ck
Diamond Member
Joined: August 2017
Posts: 11,072
|
Post by Soundcl🕤ck on Nov 7, 2021 19:53:44 GMT -5
Idk what's happening, but there's like 5 "create your own short to [Ed Sheeran song]" videos in the top 25 of most viewed YT videos in the past 24h. And all have more than 10 million views, Shivers short almost 90 million in like 2 weeks.
|
|
|
Post by phieaglesfan712 on Nov 7, 2021 19:53:57 GMT -5
In the Air Tonight in the top 10 of iTunes ... I guess everyone was watching that segment on Sunday NFL Countdown this morning.
|
|
gikem
3x Platinum Member
Joined: October 2020
Posts: 3,813
|
Post by gikem on Nov 7, 2021 20:00:30 GMT -5
Idk what's happening, but there's like 5 "create your own short to [Ed Sheeran song]" videos in the top 25 of most viewed YT videos in the past 24h. And all have more than 10 million views, Shivers short almost 90 million in like 2 weeks. I'd say that this is probably how artists and labels are trying to boost YouTube streams since music video views are down across the board, but then again UGC doesn't count for the Hot 100 anymore, so idk
|
|