avalyn
2x Platinum Member
Joined: February 2006
Posts: 2,422
|
Post by avalyn on Feb 21, 2012 16:24:10 GMT -5
Sugarland's management has released a statement about the civil lawsuit and the mud slinging the media has done today with their response filing that included asking for a trial by jury. That isn't what the mudslinging and everything was over but long story short the media has run with a supposed quote of Sugarland blaming the fans for the tragedy when the response filing doesn't say that at all.
"Sadly when a tragedy occurs, people want to point fingers and try to sensationalize the disaster. The single most important thing to Sugarland, are their fans. Their support and love over the past 9 years has been unmatched. For anyone to think otherwise is completely devastating to them," states Gail Gellman, Sugarland's manager.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2012 16:26:45 GMT -5
Rascal Flatts and AEG Live, in conjunction with NCM Fathom, will present a very special one-night-only in-theater event that will take place across the nation on Thursday, April 5 at 8pm ET/7pm CT/6pm MT/8pm PT (tape delayed). Rascal Flatts-CHANGED: One Night Exclusive Theater Event will deliver exclusive never-before-seen access into the lives of Gary LeVox, Joe Don Rooney and Jay DeMarcus, along with exclusive live performances of their biggest hits and music from their new album, Changed, set for release April 3 on Big Machine Records.www.countrymusicislove.com/2012/02/rascal-flatts-aeg-live-ncm-fathom-to-present-release-week-in-theater-event.html
|
|
StillTheSame
Gold Member
"Baby, you ain't worth the popcorn".
Joined: January 2011
Posts: 531
|
Post by StillTheSame on Feb 21, 2012 16:37:08 GMT -5
Sugarland's management has released a statement about the civil lawsuit and the mud slinging the media has done today with their response filing that included asking for a trial by jury. That isn't what the mudslinging and everything was over but long story short the media has run with a supposed quote of Sugarland blaming the fans for the tragedy when the response filing doesn't say that at all. "Sadly when a tragedy occurs, people want to point fingers and try to sensationalize the disaster. The single most important thing to Sugarland, are their fans. Their support and love over the past 9 years has been unmatched. For anyone to think otherwise is completely devastating to them," states Gail Gellman, Sugarland's manager. Thank you Gail!
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2012 19:50:23 GMT -5
Don't know if anyone's interested but I thought I'd share a list of labels and their rosters that I typed up over at CCT. countrycharttalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&p=13526#p13526It's not every single label, but it includes all "major" corporate and independent labels and the artists on their rosters.
|
|
|
Post by lesingleton on Feb 21, 2012 21:29:01 GMT -5
Sugarland's management has released a statement about the civil lawsuit and the mud slinging the media has done today with their response filing that included asking for a trial by jury. That isn't what the mudslinging and everything was over but long story short the media has run with a supposed quote of Sugarland blaming the fans for the tragedy when the response filing doesn't say that at all. "Sadly when a tragedy occurs, people want to point fingers and try to sensationalize the disaster. The single most important thing to Sugarland, are their fans. Their support and love over the past 9 years has been unmatched. For anyone to think otherwise is completely devastating to them," states Gail Gellman, Sugarland's manager. I saw the quote you mentioned too. But I also saw a quote from the lawyer's response that pretty much flat-out blamed the fans. Every story is slanted a different way depending on the opinions of the person who writes it. But there really isn't any denying that their attorney did place blame on fans. But in their response to a civil lawsuit, the band's attorneys said injured fans "failed to exercise due care for their own safety" and contended some or all of their injuries "resulted from their own fault." www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/sugarland-attorneys-injured-ind-fans-share-1006246352.story
|
|
avalyn
2x Platinum Member
Joined: February 2006
Posts: 2,422
|
Post by avalyn on Feb 21, 2012 22:34:19 GMT -5
^ Everything is slanted different yes. But I would like to say I did read the legal papers of the filing that is out on the internet. It's not so much blame to me as saying the attendee is responsible for their own selves really, being aware of surroundings and happenings at all times. Basically what is stated on the back of the tickets for shows and sporting events. That's how it came across to me. I always keep that in my mind when I go to shows. Last summer I went to a Sugarland show. It had stormed horribly all day until right before gates opened. But right as the encore started the raining started again and lightening close by and around the outside venue lines. I didn't feel safe so I left because I was on the lawn, in the middle of an open field. Sure, they didn't tell anyone to stay or leave in my situation but I chose for my own safety to leave. Maybe I am understanding it all wrong though?
|
|
|
Post by lesingleton on Feb 21, 2012 22:48:08 GMT -5
I see what you're saying, and I'm not saying that I necessarily DO think it's any one person's fault, but I don't think they should be surprised that people are getting mad they blamed the fans. I do agree that you attend any event at your own risk. Had the show been cancelled and they were still standing there it clearly would've been their fault. But that wasn't the case. They were led to believe the show would still go on. To me I would've thought that meant it wasn't serious enough to need to leave. I've been at 2 big concerts where we were evacuated for a short time with far lesser weather conditions than that show had. It sounds to me like the fans weren't properly informed of the severity of the situation. I've also heard that Sugarland was asked multiple times to postpone and they refused. Don't know whether that's true or not. But regardless, I don't think the blame can be laid on one party. However I don't think blaming the fans is right unless they were notified that it wasn't safe to still be standing there.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2012 22:48:26 GMT -5
Sugarland's management has released a statement about the civil lawsuit and the mud slinging the media has done today with their response filing that included asking for a trial by jury. That isn't what the mudslinging and everything was over but long story short the media has run with a supposed quote of Sugarland blaming the fans for the tragedy when the response filing doesn't say that at all. "Sadly when a tragedy occurs, people want to point fingers and try to sensationalize the disaster. The single most important thing to Sugarland, are their fans. Their support and love over the past 9 years has been unmatched. For anyone to think otherwise is completely devastating to them," states Gail Gellman, Sugarland's manager. I saw the quote you mentioned too. But I also saw a quote from the lawyer's response that pretty much flat-out blamed the fans. Every story is slanted a different way depending on the opinions of the person who writes it. But there really isn't any denying that their attorney did place blame on fans. But in their response to a civil lawsuit, the band's attorneys said injured fans "failed to exercise due care for their own safety" and contended some or all of their injuries "resulted from their own fault." www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/sugarland-attorneys-injured-ind-fans-share-1006246352.storyI could see how the response could be interpreted that way, but it seemed to me their lawyer was trying to say that the fans could've gotten themselves out of the situation if they felt unsafe. In this case, I could see how the lawyer would be placing some of the responsibility on the fans; ultimately they could've chosen to remove themselves from the situation, but now that they're injured they're looking for someone else to blame. Suing Sugarland isn't going to solve anything; they're entertainers and they chose to put on a show for the fans that paid to see them. Honestly, I really don't have much sympathy left for the 'fans" suing Jen and Kristian because the fact that they're placing the blame on the wrong party just tells me they care more about exploiting the situation involved than they do about the actual issue at hand. You can't tell me these people are stupid enough to believe the folks who built the stage have less responsibility for the injuries caused by its collapse than the singers performing on it?? If they are so intent on placing the blame on someone, they should've took the venue to court; the fact that they took Sugarland to court despite the fact that they have no case says it all. I'd be more sympathetic if the move didn't reek of publicity and desperation, but it's obvious they chose to sue Sugarland due to the fact that they care more about the fame of the duo and publicity attached to their name than figuring out their own situation in a dignified and appropriate manner. I hope this judge gives these "fans" no sympathy whatsoever, because they are sick people to be putting two people through so much pain.
|
|
|
Post by lesingleton on Feb 21, 2012 22:53:50 GMT -5
I saw the quote you mentioned too. But I also saw a quote from the lawyer's response that pretty much flat-out blamed the fans. Every story is slanted a different way depending on the opinions of the person who writes it. But there really isn't any denying that their attorney did place blame on fans. But in their response to a civil lawsuit, the band's attorneys said injured fans "failed to exercise due care for their own safety" and contended some or all of their injuries "resulted from their own fault." www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/sugarland-attorneys-injured-ind-fans-share-1006246352.storyI could see how the response could be interpreted that way, but it seemed to me their lawyer was trying to say that the fans could've gotten themselves out of the situation if they felt unsafe. In this case, I could see how the lawyer would be placing some of the responsibility on the fans; ultimately they could've chosen to remove themselves from the situation, but now that they're injured they're looking for someone else to blame. Suing Sugarland isn't going to solve anything; they're entertainers and they chose to put on a show for the fans that paid to see them. Honestly, I really don't have much sympathy left for the 'fans" suing Jen and Kristian because the fact that they're placing the blame on the wrong party just tells me they care more about exploiting the situation involved than they do about the actual issue at hand. You can't tell me these people are stupid enough to believe the folks who built the stage have less responsibility for the injuries caused by its collapse than the singers performing on it?? If they are so intent on placing the blame on someone, they should've took the venue to court; the fact that they took Sugarland to court despite the fact that they have no case says it all. I'd be more sympathetic if the move didn't reek of publicity and desperation, but it's obvious they chose to sue Sugarland due to the fact that they care more about the fame of the duo and publicity attached to their name than figuring out their own situation in a dignified and appropriate manner. I hope this judge gives these "fans" no sympathy whatsoever, because they are sick people to be putting two people through so much pain. ^^I'm sorry but that's about the most insensitive thing I've read. You act like it's some petty lawsuit like you'd see on Judge Judy. Remember this lawsuit also involves family members of 7 PEOPLE who LOST THEIR LIVES. It's not only "fans" looking for a payday. I've never said I agreed it was Sugarland's fault. But I think every person involved in that day holds partial responsibility for it. But it was a very unfortunate freak accident. And to be quite honest, I have zero sympathy for Sugarland, because I've thought from day one they were completely milking this for media attention. Edited to Add: Also, this lawsuit isn't only against Sugarland. They're just the only ones receiving the media attention. They lawsuit is also against the people responsible for the festival, etc.
|
|
|
Post by Fanofctrymusic on Feb 21, 2012 22:56:43 GMT -5
I have a friend who set's up many of these stages. He said the equipment at the top was not distributed evenly plus a crew should be positioned around the stage to remove the canvas top so the wind couldn't topple it.
|
|
|
Post by castleoblivion26 on Feb 21, 2012 23:58:47 GMT -5
I understand that the lawsuit is from the families of some of the victims of that tragedy but is suing Sugarland really going to do them any good? Are people supposed to be able to tell the future just because they are putting on a show? This is not something that has happened before, and was not expected. Had people seriously thought the stage might collapse then they should have shut it down. The people who were in charge of the stage could have shut it down regardless of what Jennifer Nettles said or didn't say. If it wasn't safe, they should have known it, but they didn't know it and could not have possibly prevented it.
Lawsuits like this makes me ashamed of people. If it was something that could have theoretically been prevented then yes they should be held accountable but they had no idea that would happen, how could they?
this is a case of lawyers trying to milk this tragedy to gain recognition and people grieving trying to blame anyone and everyone. Sorry if this seems cold but I just think this situation is getting out of hand
|
|
viviiscool
New Member
Joined: November 2009
Posts: 73
|
Post by viviiscool on Feb 22, 2012 0:50:59 GMT -5
I see what you're saying, and I'm not saying that I necessarily DO think it's any one person's fault, but I don't think they should be surprised that people are getting mad they blamed the fans. I do agree that you attend any event at your own risk. Had the show been cancelled and they were still standing there it clearly would've been their fault. But that wasn't the case. They were led to believe the show would still go on. To me I would've thought that meant it wasn't serious enough to need to leave. I've been at 2 big concerts where we were evacuated for a short time with far lesser weather conditions than that show had. It sounds to me like the fans weren't properly informed of the severity of the situation. I've also heard that Sugarland was asked multiple times to postpone and they refused. Don't know whether that's true or not. But regardless, I don't think the blame can be laid on one party. However I don't think blaming the fans is right unless they were notified that it wasn't safe to still be standing there. That part is turning into a he said she said situation. Apparently a rep from one of the companies that is getting A LOT of the blame is saying they asked to delay twice (though idk what delaying would have done because most fans would probably not have left because they would have lost their spot in the pit) but Sugarland's Rep (Hellen) is saying they were NEVER asked. And how was Sugarland milking this for attention? They were victims as well. They went through this HORRIBLE situation and they (Jennifer and Kristian) barely spoke about it. It's in the news now because their attorney said some poorly worded statement about how the fans were responsible for themselves more than Sugarland was (which is true).
|
|
musicbuff78
5x Platinum Member
Joined: January 2005
Posts: 5,280
|
Post by musicbuff78 on Feb 22, 2012 3:02:21 GMT -5
I could see how the response could be interpreted that way, but it seemed to me their lawyer was trying to say that the fans could've gotten themselves out of the situation if they felt unsafe. In this case, I could see how the lawyer would be placing some of the responsibility on the fans; ultimately they could've chosen to remove themselves from the situation, but now that they're injured they're looking for someone else to blame. Suing Sugarland isn't going to solve anything; they're entertainers and they chose to put on a show for the fans that paid to see them. Honestly, I really don't have much sympathy left for the 'fans" suing Jen and Kristian because the fact that they're placing the blame on the wrong party just tells me they care more about exploiting the situation involved than they do about the actual issue at hand. You can't tell me these people are stupid enough to believe the folks who built the stage have less responsibility for the injuries caused by its collapse than the singers performing on it?? If they are so intent on placing the blame on someone, they should've took the venue to court; the fact that they took Sugarland to court despite the fact that they have no case says it all. I'd be more sympathetic if the move didn't reek of publicity and desperation, but it's obvious they chose to sue Sugarland due to the fact that they care more about the fame of the duo and publicity attached to their name than figuring out their own situation in a dignified and appropriate manner. I hope this judge gives these "fans" no sympathy whatsoever, because they are sick people to be putting two people through so much pain. ^^I'm sorry but that's about the most insensitive thing I've read. You act like it's some petty lawsuit like you'd see on Judge Judy. Remember this lawsuit also involves family members of 7 PEOPLE who LOST THEIR LIVES. It's not only "fans" looking for a payday. I've never said I agreed it was Sugarland's fault. But I think every person involved in that day holds partial responsibility for it. But it was a very unfortunate freak accident. And to be quite honest, I have zero sympathy for Sugarland, because I've thought from day one they were completely milking this for media attention. Edited to Add: Also, this lawsuit isn't only against Sugarland. They're just the only ones receiving the media attention. They lawsuit is also against the people responsible for the festival, etc. I don't think it's insensitive at all and I agree with every word of it. The venue and the stage company should be the ones responsible for all of this. If mother nature could be sued, she'd be one broke bitch. Look at all the freak accidents that happen ALL the time weather realted (musical event or not). Like some others have posted, I think the people that are trying to sue Sugarland for this are just trying to milk every penny however they can right now because they know they have NO CHANCE IN HELL of winning this lawsuit.
|
|
Dustin J.
3x Platinum Member
90's country guru
Joined: January 2005
Posts: 3,088
|
Post by Dustin J. on Feb 22, 2012 8:33:53 GMT -5
^^I'm sorry but that's about the most insensitive thing I've read. You act like it's some petty lawsuit like you'd see on Judge Judy. Remember this lawsuit also involves family members of 7 PEOPLE who LOST THEIR LIVES. It's not only "fans" looking for a payday. I've never said I agreed it was Sugarland's fault. But I think every person involved in that day holds partial responsibility for it. But it was a very unfortunate freak accident. And to be quite honest, I have zero sympathy for Sugarland, because I've thought from day one they were completely milking this for media attention. Edited to Add: Also, this lawsuit isn't only against Sugarland. They're just the only ones receiving the media attention. They lawsuit is also against the people responsible for the festival, etc. I don't think it's insensitive at all and I agree with every word of it. The venue and the stage company should be the ones responsible for all of this. If mother nature could be sued, she'd be one broke bitch. Look at all the freak accidents that happen ALL the time weather realted (musical event or not). Like some others have posted, I think the people that are trying to sue Sugarland for this are just trying to milk every penny however they can right now because they know they have NO CHANCE IN HELL of winning this lawsuit. I don't get to say this very often, so I'll take advantage of the opportunity to do so now... I agree with, Steelo! :)
|
|
Dustin J.
3x Platinum Member
90's country guru
Joined: January 2005
Posts: 3,088
|
Post by Dustin J. on Feb 22, 2012 8:42:20 GMT -5
Random Video of the Day
River Road - "Breathless" (note - video starts at :27; documentary follows)
|
|
Ten Pound Hammer
9x Platinum Member
Banned
I watched it all on my radio
Joined: August 2006
Posts: 9,595
|
Post by Ten Pound Hammer on Feb 22, 2012 12:54:59 GMT -5
^That so should've been a hit. Hell, so should've "Nickajack".
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2012 13:12:08 GMT -5
I could see how the response could be interpreted that way, but it seemed to me their lawyer was trying to say that the fans could've gotten themselves out of the situation if they felt unsafe. In this case, I could see how the lawyer would be placing some of the responsibility on the fans; ultimately they could've chosen to remove themselves from the situation, but now that they're injured they're looking for someone else to blame. Suing Sugarland isn't going to solve anything; they're entertainers and they chose to put on a show for the fans that paid to see them. Honestly, I really don't have much sympathy left for the 'fans" suing Jen and Kristian because the fact that they're placing the blame on the wrong party just tells me they care more about exploiting the situation involved than they do about the actual issue at hand. You can't tell me these people are stupid enough to believe the folks who built the stage have less responsibility for the injuries caused by its collapse than the singers performing on it?? If they are so intent on placing the blame on someone, they should've took the venue to court; the fact that they took Sugarland to court despite the fact that they have no case says it all. I'd be more sympathetic if the move didn't reek of publicity and desperation, but it's obvious they chose to sue Sugarland due to the fact that they care more about the fame of the duo and publicity attached to their name than figuring out their own situation in a dignified and appropriate manner. I hope this judge gives these "fans" no sympathy whatsoever, because they are sick people to be putting two people through so much pain. ^^I'm sorry but that's about the most insensitive thing I've read. You act like it's some petty lawsuit like you'd see on Judge Judy. Remember this lawsuit also involves family members of 7 PEOPLE who LOST THEIR LIVES. It's not only "fans" looking for a payday. I've never said I agreed it was Sugarland's fault. But I think every person involved in that day holds partial responsibility for it. But it was a very unfortunate freak accident. And to be quite honest, I have zero sympathy for Sugarland, because I've thought from day one they were completely milking this for media attention. Edited to Add: Also, this lawsuit isn't only against Sugarland. They're just the only ones receiving the media attention. They lawsuit is also against the people responsible for the festival, etc. I feel horrible for the victims of this tragedy and I'm NOT trying to minimize that in any way. What happened was truly terrible, and I'm sure their families have gone through unbearable pain. However, the way this whole situation has been handled leaves a bitter taste in my mouth; suing everyone under the sun isn't going to do any good, and it's not going to bring any of the victims back. I know everyone deals with grief differently, but dragging people to court and trying to get money out of them accomplishes nothing, and frankly, I think it's pretty insensitive. There are plenty of ways to honor the victims to begin a healing process, but I can't agree that this is a tasteful way to do it. In my mind, these families are not doing themselves (or the victims) any favors by portraying themselves this way; the families are the one's representing the victims, so I think it's kind of disrespectful to them to be carrying on this way about money that cannot replace the loss felt by so many.
|
|
onebuffalo
Diamond Member
#LiteralLegender
I am One Buffalo.
Joined: June 2009
Posts: 26,619
|
Post by onebuffalo on Feb 22, 2012 13:35:17 GMT -5
^It certainly does not help when a lawyer for Sugarland is blaming the fans for the tragic incident. How can anyone blame them? If I were Jennifer Nettles and Kristian Bush, I would fire those attorney(s) and start all over again. Yes, they need legal protection at this time!
|
|
StillTheSame
Gold Member
"Baby, you ain't worth the popcorn".
Joined: January 2011
Posts: 531
|
Post by StillTheSame on Feb 22, 2012 14:32:29 GMT -5
^^^^^^That's EXACTLY how I feel. I cannot fathom why any lawyer would say that about their client. I know it's their job to defend them, but good gracious - not like THAT.
|
|
|
Post by lesingleton on Feb 22, 2012 16:01:14 GMT -5
^It certainly does not help when a lawyer for Sugarland is blaming the fans for the tragic incident. How can anyone blame them? If I were Jennifer Nettles and Kristian Bush, I would fire those attorney(s) and start all over again. Yes, they need legal protection at this time! That was really my point to begin with. The original post was talking about the mud slinging and my point was that it was totally ridiculous for their lawyer to have ever said that. And they shouldn't be surprised that it's pissing people off. Especially if they stick with that lawyer, in which case you're left to assume they agree with the stupid statement. The reason this irritates me so bad though is because I'm so sick of hearing how it affects Sugarland, how they feel about it, etc. I don't think it really matters how they feel. They were never in danger. They were safely under ground while 7 people were being killed and many more injured. Who cares how they feel about it? If anything I bet the main thing they feel is "glad we weren't on that stage."
|
|
Typo
6x Platinum Member
Dispensable
Joined: September 2009
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Typo on Feb 22, 2012 18:42:14 GMT -5
Kacey Musgraves earned a standing ovation for her performance of "Merry Go Round" at today's UMG Nashville Luncheon:
Love this girl. I really hope she hits it big. She deserves it.
|
|
|
Post by lesingleton on Feb 22, 2012 19:15:37 GMT -5
^^Thanks for posting! I love her too, can't wait to see how things go for her! (And to hear about this tour she's going to be on!)
|
|
avalyn
2x Platinum Member
Joined: February 2006
Posts: 2,422
|
Post by avalyn on Feb 23, 2012 3:35:08 GMT -5
I suppose this isn't expected but Vince Gill is no longer signed to UMG. They parted ways I take it? He appeared at the luncheon for the label yesterday as a thank you to radio and made the announcement according country aircheck.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2012 5:48:59 GMT -5
I suppose this isn't expected but Vince Gill is no longer signed to UMG. They parted ways I take it? He appeared at the luncheon for the label yesterday as a thank you to radio and made the announcement according country aircheck. Yep, Country Aircheck tweeted that Vince is no longer with the label :( Also, some new artist signings that I've added to the artists by label thread I compiled at CCT. EMI Records Announces New Signing EMI Records Nashville has signed singer/songwriter Kelleigh Bannen to the label. The Nashville native has been hard at work in the studio working with Paul Worley and Jerry Smith on her debut album. Bannen’s first single will hit radio later this year. Website: www.kelleighbannen.com/Myspace: www.myspace.com/kelleighbannenFacebook: www.facebook.com/kelleighbannenSource: MusicRow ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- New Artist Signed to Stoney Creek Records - Lindsay EllNew website is coming soon! The current page includes links to her: - Facebook Page - Twitter Page - YouTube Account - MySpace Page ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- New Artists on Bigger Picture GroupChris Janson*Janson was formerly signed to BNA. Rachel Bradshaw*Rachel is the daughter of Terry Bradshaw and the co-writer of Jerrod Niemann's top 5 hit "What Do You Want". D. Vincent Williams*He has co-written several big hits, including James Otto's "Just Got Started Lovin' You", Rascal Flatts' "I'm Movin' On", Neal McCoy's "The Last Of A Dying Breed", and Ty Herndon's "Hands Of A Working Man". Ryan Kinder*Ryan is a singer-songwriter from Alabama who has built a following in the south.
|
|
Dustin J.
3x Platinum Member
90's country guru
Joined: January 2005
Posts: 3,088
|
Post by Dustin J. on Feb 23, 2012 8:24:32 GMT -5
Random Video of the Day
Shane McAnally - "Say Anything"
|
|
McCreerian
9x Platinum Member
Joined: June 2010
Posts: 9,074
|
Post by McCreerian on Feb 23, 2012 18:16:49 GMT -5
Apparently the only songs Scotty and Lauren sang at CRS's UMG show was "You Make that Look Good" and "Dirt Road Prayer" respectively. So that is pretty good indication those will be their 3rd singles, theres no better place to sing them first than there! If this is the case, then I believe both will finally get their first top 10 hits or even better. Heres a cool pic I found of Scotty and King George! twitter.com/#!/kyfan4scotty/status/172797506466488320/photo/1
|
|
.indulgecountry
Diamond Member
Best Country Poster 2011, 2017, & 2018
"You left a mark on my face // And brought a dozen red flags in a vase"
|
Post by .indulgecountry on Feb 23, 2012 18:32:12 GMT -5
^ I think Scotty will definitely be headed for the Top 10 once they get that single out there. It is a very strong choice for radio, and I think he'll finally get some radio success to mirror his excellent album/single sales.
However, I am skeptical about Dirt Road Prayer for Lauren. Its a pretty great song, and a lovely vocal, but I'm not sold on it being a breakout hit. Georgia Peaches is a lot more radio friendly and it has been doing only mildly better than her lead single, while I had expected it to perform quite a bit better. If GP can't get her to the Top 20, I'm not sure she has a song from Wildflower that will do it. She has several ballads on the album that sound like something that could be a surprise hit like THTBM was for Miranda, but that song only caught on because Miranda was already a rising star at that point. Lauren's efforts will probably sputter.
|
|
avalyn
2x Platinum Member
Joined: February 2006
Posts: 2,422
|
Post by avalyn on Feb 23, 2012 20:59:23 GMT -5
» Dungan To Helm UMG/Nashville: No official comment has been made, but Country Aircheck has confirmed that Capitol/Nashville & EMI Nashville President/CEO Mike Dungan is moving to UMG/Nashville in a similar capacity, as UMGN Chairman Luke Lewis transitions to a new yet-to-be-determined role with the company. Details as they become available.
- breaking country aircheck news
|
|
carriekins
5x Platinum Member
With my mouth wide open in a whiskey rain, I could stand here 24 hours a day...
Joined: November 2011
Posts: 5,328
|
Post by carriekins on Feb 23, 2012 21:01:46 GMT -5
Whoa.
Well. With the pending sale of EMI to UMG, this isn't all that surprising, I guess.
Curious to see how this move affects the Capitol Roster.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2012 21:31:41 GMT -5
|
|