Billboard Hot 100: 07/17/2021

[wavey.]

Jul 6, 2021 22:46:10 GMT -5 Rose "Payola" Nylund said:

If anything, they're probably more jealous that they don't have an act on their roster with fans stupid enough to dish money over to them the way Army does for BTS.

This. I know thier label has to be eating good.

[85la]

Jul 6, 2021 22:46:10 GMT -5 Rose "Payola" Nylund said:

I mean, if we really think Billboard should change something and believe Billboard listen to the record labels, people could organize campaigns to attract the attention of non-BTS record labels and artists because they're the ones at a disservice. Although do we really think they actually care? If anything, they're probably more jealous that they don't have an act on their roster with fans stupid enough to dish money over to them the way Army does for BTS.

True, but I can definitely assure you other labels and artists do care because they simply don't have such fans. For sure they are definitely starting to take notice. Each additional week at #1 is a week less at #1 for other artists, and feathers are definitely being riled and their arsenals must be starting up.

[Deleted]

Jul 6, 2021 22:53:17 GMT -5 85la said:

Jul 6, 2021 22:27:12 GMT -5 @nicky1388 said:

If you DM me i can prove it ain't me.

How exactly can you "prove" that though? I'll admit I am a bit suspicious myself. You are the one who revealed to us that tweet with the screen capture, so you obviously know about it and it would seem not as likely (though not impossible) that you would just randomly happen to scroll by it.

Also a little something else I noticed, it might not have to do with anything, but your profile indicates you first joined this board in 2018, but didn't start posting until very recently if I'm not mistaken, 3 years later..

Edit: I was mistaken, it wasn't your first post, but still relatively few posts until recently

I can direct you to all 3 of my twitter accounts. Those posts pop up on my timeline because i am an army.

I am the one who chose to cut out names because i feel that when sharing screenshots you shouldn't share names and stuff from other sites.

Also, i joined 3 years ago because that is when BTS first started having a chance on the charts and i was curious about it. However, they were only hitting 85 so there weren't Any debates or mass buying to rally against.

I finally started talking because i hate what is happening. I hate my timeline being so obsessed with this title that unfortunately doesn't really belong to them organically as my timeline is wont to say.

However, if i said any of this on my twitter (and i did try) i would lose every friend that i have gained in the army community and as stated previously, when theyre not talking about mass buying, i enjoy talking to them. 

Here is the actual screenshot i took before cropping. These tweets are common my timeline because I am an army and these are big accounts looking for some reason to drive people to buy. So i see this stuff and thought i would share. Not in a vicious way but because if theyre gonna screenshot ya'll, why shouldn't you know?

[Rose "Payola" Nylund]

Jul 6, 2021 23:09:44 GMT -5 85la said:

Jul 6, 2021 22:46:10 GMT -5 Rose "Payola" Nylund said:

I mean, if we really think Billboard should change something and believe Billboard listen to the record labels, people could organize campaigns to attract the attention of non-BTS record labels and artists because they're the ones at a disservice. Although do we really think they actually care? If anything, they're probably more jealous that they don't have an act on their roster with fans stupid enough to dish money over to them the way Army does for BTS.

True, but I can definitely assure you other labels and artists do care because they simply don't have such fans. For sure they are definitely starting to take notice. Each additional week at #1 is a week less at #1 for other artists, and feathers are definitely being riled and their arsenals must be starting up.

Are they though? Has there been any indication as such anywhere?

My theory is that most labels don't actually care about the Hot 100 except in the contest of their biggest acts, and even then it's just bragging rights and an extra promotional item. There are tons of other charts and measures that showcase how well an artist is doing that is more relevant to the audience of those artists. I'd use streaming charts as a marketing tool over the Hot 100.

[dremolus - solarpunk]

Jul 6, 2021 22:37:04 GMT -5 wavey. said:

Jul 6, 2021 18:33:01 GMT -5 Gary said:

If this is really this serious of a problem, anyone try writing Billboard about this to see if they can recognize what you guys see as a problem and even see if they are willing to change to give you guys the chart you want?

We both wasted our keystrokes here. Let em be upset🤷🏽

Both of you need to shut up with this "If you're so annoyed about this then just write to Billboard" bs.

[KeepDeanWeird]

Jul 6, 2021 19:48:52 GMT -5 Baby Yoda Hot100Fan said:

^As one, the situation came as a result of bad chart rules that either hurt or benefited certain songs. The Billboard 200 was not without flaws in the 1990s due to existence of Top Pop Catalog Albums. The Top Comprehensive Albums chart was representative then and, not surprisingly, it eventually became the present Billboard 200.

Absolutely correct on both points. Particularly in the 90s, labels had a choice to not chart a song, limited release single (e.g., 'My Heart Will Go On'), or do a fully stock stores (e.g., 'How Will I Live').

Until the Comprehensive Album chart became current B200, there were huge flaws - like 'Dark Side of the Moon' usually being the only catalog album to chart... the pre-Soundscan chart bias against country and black albums, etc.

The biggest flaw in H100 is that the tracks from physical/digital full-album sales don't count to H100. There's no reason why the individual tracks shouldn't get points from the weekly album sales. Those same tracks get the streaming points or, if say, someone buys 9 individual tracks, but not the whole album. It illogical - especially since EVERYTHING counts toward B200.

[Rose "Payola" Nylund]

Jul 6, 2021 23:48:23 GMT -5 KeepDeanWeird said:

The biggest flaw in H100 is that the tracks from physical/digital full-album sales don't count to H100. There's no reason why the individual tracks shouldn't get points from the weekly album sales. Those same tracks get the streaming points or, if say, someone buys 9 individual tracks, but not the whole album. It illogical - especially since EVERYTHING counts toward B200.

This!

Though it’s probably less of an issue now than, say, 2015 when Adele should have literally have had the top 11.

[thegreatdivine]

Jul 6, 2021 22:46:10 GMT -5 Rose "Payola" Nylund said:

I mean, if we really think Billboard should change something and believe Billboard listen to the record labels, people could organize campaigns to attract the attention of non-BTS record labels and artists because they're the ones at a disservice. Although do we really think they actually care? If anything, they're probably more jealous that they don't have an act on their roster with fans stupid enough to dish money over to them the way Army does for BTS.

I think another way that changes to Billboard's methodology regarding certain metrics can be made is by them getting hit with a lot of negative press. Last year, I knew that when Kenny Chesney's album debuted at #1 over Drake's mixtape despite Kenny's album only reaching the #1 spot because of bundles for his tour (which he cancelled immediately following his album debuting at #1) and despite Drake's mixtape being streamed 20x more than Kenny's album for that week, they'd make some changes. I felt confident of a change being made because publications like the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal both covered what happened and they only covered it because Drake is such a huge artist. Throughout that week, more and more publications were very critical in their remarks, referring to how much of a joke Billboard's charts had become and how easy it was for artists to blatantly game their charts. When I saw all that bad press, I knew it wouldn't be long till they made some changes and I was right. I've noticed that Billboard doesn't like being publicly criticized, having their authority being questioned and getting a ton of negative press. They respond rather quickly to either of those things.

I think something similar would have to happen for a smiliar change to be made regarding mass-buying. If an act as major as Adele releases a new single and gets blocked by BTS because of their insistent mass-buying, the bad press from that will be much for Billboard to ignore. It may take a while but changes will be made. Especially if other artists also notice and speak on it and if Adele's label makes a complaint. Short of that, I really don't see them making any changes in regards to mass-buying.

[dremolus - solarpunk]

US Spotify - 07/05/21

1(=) Olivia Rodrigo - good 4 u 1,733,789 (-23,822)
2(=) Doja Cat - Kiss Me More 1,216,064 (-94,740)
3(=) Dua Lipa - Levitating 954,199 (-31,327)
4(+1) Olivia Rodrigo - deja vu 911,669 (+24,608)
5(-1) Lil Nas X - MONTERO (Call Me By Your Name) 904,483 (-14,149)
6(=) Polo G - RAPSTAR 874,246 (+7,498)
7(=) Måneskin - Beggin' 844,916 (+25,621)
8(+1) Olivia Rodrigo - traitor 839,833 (+34,139)
9(-1) Doja Cat, The Weeknd - You Right 804,585 (-13,848)
10(+1) Ed Sheeran - Bad Habits 788,492 (+15,535)

Others:
11(-1) Megan Thee Stallion - Thot Shit 746,049 (-50,490)
12(+2) Glass Animals - Heat Waves 745,665 (-7,077)
13(-1) Tyler The Creator, YoungBoy Never Broke Again, Ty Dolla $ign - WUSYANAME 742,472 (-23,237)
14(-1) Justin Bieber - Peaches 714,472 (-51,046)
15(+1) Drake - Wants and Needs 694,163 (-6,536)
16(-1) Bad Bunny - Yonaguni 678,686 (-41,072)
17(+2) Doja Cat - Ain't Shit 667,728 (+31,166)
18(+4) Olivia Rodrigo - favorite crime 646,997 (+49,147)
19(-1) Rauw Alejandro - Todo De Ti 612,120 (-32,413)
20(=) Bruno Mars, Anderson .Paak, Silk Sonic - Leave the Door Open 589,427 (-38,741)
21(+3) Olivia Rodrigo - happier 588,862 (+21,891)
22(+3) Olivia Rodrigo - brutal 582,169 (+18,933)
24(+2) The Weeknd - Save Your Tears Remix 557,398 (-2,784)
25(+2) Masked Wolf - Astronaut In The Ocean 553,747 (-3,728)
26(+4) WILLOW - t r a n s p a r e n t s o u l 514,063 (-7,423)
27(+5) Olivia Rodrigo - jealousy, jealousy 513,222 (+18,483)
28(+3) BTS - Butter 504,802 (-6,547)
29(+4) DaBaby - Ball If I Want To 491,162 (+6,101)
30(+4) DJ Khaled - EVERY CHANCE I GET 478,460 (-4,600)
31(+5) Doja Cat - Need to Know 467,298 (-9,915)
34(+8) Giveon - Heartbreak Anniversary 437,936 (+3,520)
35(+4) DaBaby - Red Light Green Light 435,883 (-2,962)
37(+9) Maroon 5 - Beautiful Mistakes 427,574 (+9,997)
38(+3) Nelly, Florida Georgia Line - Lil Bit 426,310 (-8,454)
39(+4) Trippie Redd - Miss the Rage 424,122 (-799)
40(=) Saweetie - Best Friend 414,115 (-21,497)
41(+8) Roddy Ricch - Late At Night 407,866 (+2,377)
42(+3) Tyler the Creator - JUGGERNAUT 403,687 (-14,658)
44(+6) Cochise, $NOT - Tell Em 396,790 (-5,596)
46(+8) Olivia Rodrigo - enough for you 389,733 (+17,946)
47(+6) Walker Hayes - Fancy Like 381,076 (+4,873)
51(+7) Marshmello - Leave Before You Love Me 376,611 (+14,177)
52(+5) Bella Poarch - Build a Bitch 364,160 (+1,106)
53(+9) Måneskin - I WANNA BE YOUR SLAVE 354,830 (+4,884)
54(+5) Kali Uchis - telepatía 352,825 (-6,460)
57(+14) Luke Combs - Forever After All 350,442 (+8,902)
58(+5) Surf Curse - Freaks 347,324 (-1,247)
62(-7) Nio Garcia, J Balvin, Bad Bunny - AM Remix 339,223 (-29,559)
64(+13) J. Cole - m y . l i f e 337,242 (+7,101)
69(=) Bo Burnham - All Eyes On Me 329,987 (-12,664)
70(+4) Tyler the Creator - LEMONHEAD 328,307 (-10,862)
71(+1) Tyler the Creator - LUMBERJACK 328,212 (-13,138)
72(-5) Brent Faiyaz - Wasting Time 325,913 (-20,098)
73(+16) Tyler the Creator - SWEET / I THOUGHT YOU WANTED TO DANCE 315,610 (+5,198)
75(+7) Bo Burnham - Welcome to the Internet 311,103 (-2,893)
76(+5) Doja Cat - I Don't Do Drugs 310,019 (-7,710)
79(+13) J. Cole - p r i d e . i s . t h e . d e v i l 304,362 (+1,055)
80(+5) J Balvin, Maria Becerra - Qué Más Pues? 297,663 (-14,158)
83(+10) Doja Cat - Get Into It (Yuh) 295,659 (-6,014)
86(+14) Interney Money - His & Hers 290,104 (+6,282)
88(+6) Tyler the Creator - HOT WIND BLOWS 287,515 (-11,862)
90(+15) Polo G - GANG GANG 279,663 (-40,187)
91(+5) MoneyBagg Yo - Wockesha 282,922 (-14,581)
92(+23) The Kid LAROI - WITHOUT YOU 282,232 (+9,405)
98(+6) Migos - Having Our Way 274,684 (-6,658)
100(+9) Tai Verdes - A-O-K 272,921 (-3,523)

101(+19) Billie Eilish - Lost Cause 272,917 (+3,971)
109(+16) The Weeknd - Save Your Tears 267,480 (+3,077)
112(+15) Lil Baby, Lil Durk - Hats Off 265,649 (+4,311)
117(+18) Bo Burnham - Bezos I 261,634 (+6,981)
118(+11) Chris Young, Kane Brown - Famous Friends 261,432 (+1,821)
120(-18) Big Red Machine - Renegade 260,656 (-21,276)
126(+19) Sleepy Hallow - 2055 250,344 (+7,139)
134(-33) Little Big Town - Wine, Beer, Whiskey 243,183 (-38,768)
138(-7) BIA - WHOLE LOTTA MONEY 240,142 (-18,870)
140(+28) Dan + Shay - Glad You Exist 236,866 (+14,443)
141(+8) Migos - Straightenin 236,706 (-4,139)
145(+7) Trinidad Cardona - Dinero 232,600 (-3,191)
148(+10) Lorde - Solar Power 231,175 (+2,037)
152(+12) Polo G - No Return 226,808 (+3,111)
153(+16) Madison Beer - Reckless 225,892 (+4,218)
159(+2) Young Stoner Life, Young Thug, Gunna - Ski 223,003 (-4,154)
162(+13) Elle King, Miranda Lambert - Drunk (And I Don't Wanna Go Home) 219,309 (-452)
164(+13) Bo Burnham - Look Who's Inside Again 218,176 (-608)
167(+7) G Herbo, Polo G, Lil Tjay - Cry No More 214,804 (-5,307)
170(+28) Sarah Cothran - As the World Caves In 214,009 (+6,083)
171(+20) Galantis - Heartbreak Anthem 213,718 (+3,393)
173(+23) PinkPantheress - Pain 212,403 (+3,650)
185(re-entry) Riley Green - If It Wasn’t For Trucks 204,157
186(re-entry) Duncan Laurence - Arcade 204,118
200(re-entry) Blueface, Og Bobby Billions - Outside (Better Days) 198,062

Total Streams for Save Your Tears: 824,878

[shayonce]

Jul 7, 2021 3:16:30 GMT -5 thegreatdivine said:

I think another way that changes to Billboard's methodology regarding certain metrics can be made is by them getting hit with a lot of negative press. Last year, I knew that when Kenny Chesney's album debuted at #1 over Drake's mixtape despite Kenny's album only reaching the #1 spot because of bundles for his tour (which he cancelled immediately following his album debuting at #1) and despite Drake's mixtape being streamed 20x more than Kenny's album for that week, they'd make some changes. I felt confident of a change being made because publications like the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal both covered what happened and they only covered it because Drake is such a huge artist. Throughout that week, more and more publications were very critical in their remarks, referring to how much of a joke Billboard's charts had become and how easy it was for artists to blatantly game their charts. When I saw all that bad press, I knew it wouldn't be long till they made some changes and I was right. I've noticed that Billboard doesn't like being publicly criticized, having their authority being questioned and getting a ton of negative press. They respond rather quickly to either of those things.

I think something similar would have to happen for a smiliar change to be made regarding mass-buying. If an act as major as Adele releases a new single and gets blocked by BTS because of their insistent mass-buying, the bad press from that will be much for Billboard to ignore. It may take a while but changes will be made. Especially if other artists also notice and speak on it and if Adele's label makes a complaint. Short of that, I really don't see them making any changes in regards to mass-buying.

all those media are scared of BTS Army and they don't want to be labeled as racist, xenophobic.
so we won't see that criticism from big media for a while.

[wavey.]

Omg is PinkPanthress gaining steam? I hope it stays consistent. Although her tracks are short, they are so good lol.

[kimberly]

#2 song of the summer my ass

[phieaglesfan712]

I just realized a Dirt Band song was in the Top 10 of iTunes, but it's not Mr. Bojangles. wtf?

[¤ Matthea ¤]

Jul 7, 2021 3:16:30 GMT -5 thegreatdivine said:

Jul 6, 2021 22:46:10 GMT -5 Rose "Payola" Nylund said:

I mean, if we really think Billboard should change something and believe Billboard listen to the record labels, people could organize campaigns to attract the attention of non-BTS record labels and artists because they're the ones at a disservice. Although do we really think they actually care? If anything, they're probably more jealous that they don't have an act on their roster with fans stupid enough to dish money over to them the way Army does for BTS.

I think another way that changes to Billboard's methodology regarding certain metrics can be made is by them getting hit with a lot of negative press. Last year, I knew that when Kenny Chesney's album debuted at #1 over Drake's mixtape despite Kenny's album only reaching the #1 spot because of bundles for his tour (which he cancelled immediately following his album debuting at #1) and despite Drake's mixtape being streamed 20x more than Kenny's album for that week, they'd make some changes. I felt confident of a change being made because publications like the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal both covered what happened and they only covered it because Drake is such a huge artist. Throughout that week, more and more publications were very critical in their remarks, referring to how much of a joke Billboard's charts had become and how easy it was for artists to blatantly game their charts. When I saw all that bad press, I knew it wouldn't be long till they made some changes and I was right. I've noticed that Billboard doesn't like being publicly criticized, having their authority being questioned and getting a ton of negative press. They respond rather quickly to either of those things.

I think something similar would have to happen for a smiliar change to be made regarding mass-buying. If an act as major as Adele releases a new single and gets blocked by BTS because of their insistent mass-buying, the bad press from that will be much for Billboard to ignore. It may take a while but changes will be made. Especially if other artists also notice and speak on it and if Adele's label makes a complaint. Short of that, I really don't see them making any changes in regards to mass-buying.

Adele and BTS are labelmates in the US. Columbia wouldn't complain about BTS blocking Adele, they wouldn't release Adele's new single while the Army is mass buying and delivering weeks at #1 for their label.

[thegreatdivine]

¤ Matthea ¤ oh right, they're labelmates in the US. I forgot about that. Anyways, my point was that it would take a major artist getting blocked due to BTS' mass-buying and that getting a ton of negative press for Billboard to make any changes concerning that.

[oliviafan101]

Jul 6, 2021 18:26:11 GMT -5 @nicky1388 said:

Jul 6, 2021 18:10:26 GMT -5 rimetm said:

(Yes, estimates for this past week place the song's sales outside of the webstore at just 7,000)

I don't understand why my fellow army can't see 17 as respectable. i personally think that isn't that bad 6 weeks in when just a couple years ago we were happy to get 1 week at 85. like, plenty of good artists don't spend all their time at #1. Honestly, i'd rather it stay stable in the top 50 then burn out at 1 before tanking.

Armys are just like corporatists. Nothing is enough for them and nothing will ever be enough for them.

[oliviafan101]

Imagine spending your entire life savings on trying to get some artist or artists who don’t care that much about you to reach #1 on an arbitrary chart instead of spending it on something that’s actually fun or helpful or donating some of it to the poor.

Remember, most of the profit that comes from sales goes to the label and the executives in the label (who are probably rich as shit) not the artist. You’re just making the rich richer and not helping the poor.

[meg]

Jul 7, 2021 8:28:12 GMT -5 oliviafan101 said:

Imagine spending your entire life savings on trying to get some artist or artists who don’t care that much about you to reach #1 on an arbitrary chart instead of spending it on something that’s actually fun or helpful or donating some of it to the poor.

Remember, most of the profit that comes from sales goes to the label and the executives in the label (who are probably rich as s**t) not the artist. You’re just making the rich richer and not helping the poor.

What life savings? Why do you all have this idea in your head that armys are some poor teenagers that spend their last $10 on BTS. Those who buy it are working adults who also buy ton of merch BH release basically every week. And shut up about donating to the poor when there's a legit organization created by Armys with experience who make projects around the world to help. And endless local fandoms who make donation projects like their build a school in China or donated thousands of money in hours to Palestine. They can do both and it's also their money.
BTS also are the global ambasadors of Louis Vuitton and today was a fashion show and I bet the clothes will be sold out too. Teenagers you all say? Life savings you say? And armys know BTS are getting richer and they are really happy about it.

[jeiboy]

US Spotify:


#1. good 4 u (=)
#3. deja vu (+1)
#5. traitor (+3)
#12. favorite crime (+6)
#18. happier (+3)
#20. brutal (+2)
#21. drivers license (+2)
#23. jealousy (+5)
#34. enough for you (+12)
#46. 1 step forward, 3 steps back (+21)


Week 7!

This is just insane!

[phieaglesfan712]

It's pretty obvious at this point that Good 4 u is going to return to #1 on the Hot 100 this week. Just like with LTDO, G4u just feels too big to only be a one-week #1.

[Choco]

Jul 7, 2021 8:48:47 GMT -5 phieaglesfan712 said:

It's pretty obvious at this point that Good 4 u is going to return to #1 on the Hot 100 this week. Just like with LTDO, G4u just feels too big to only be a one-week #1.

stfu before someone reads this and buys 365k copies of Margarine.

(Also am I the only one that feels like LTDO wasn't that big of a deal? Granted, I got bored of it quite quickly so it might just be me).

[lazer]

Jul 7, 2021 8:48:47 GMT -5 phieaglesfan712 said:

It's pretty obvious at this point that Good 4 u is going to return to #1 on the Hot 100 this week. Just like with LTDO, G4u just feels too big to only be a one-week #1.

You might want to delete this before someone from Twitter screenshots this.

[Groovy]

I don't see anything going recurrent other than maybe Calling My Phone but I think that'll rebound after the Doja Cat/Tyler songs exiting.

[Rose "Payola" Nylund]

Jul 7, 2021 8:01:17 GMT -5 ¤ Matthea ¤ said:

Jul 7, 2021 3:16:30 GMT -5 thegreatdivine said:

I think another way that changes to Billboard's methodology regarding certain metrics can be made is by them getting hit with a lot of negative press. Last year, I knew that when Kenny Chesney's album debuted at #1 over Drake's mixtape despite Kenny's album only reaching the #1 spot because of bundles for his tour (which he cancelled immediately following his album debuting at #1) and despite Drake's mixtape being streamed 20x more than Kenny's album for that week, they'd make some changes. I felt confident of a change being made because publications like the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal both covered what happened and they only covered it because Drake is such a huge artist. Throughout that week, more and more publications were very critical in their remarks, referring to how much of a joke Billboard's charts had become and how easy it was for artists to blatantly game their charts. When I saw all that bad press, I knew it wouldn't be long till they made some changes and I was right. I've noticed that Billboard doesn't like being publicly criticized, having their authority being questioned and getting a ton of negative press. They respond rather quickly to either of those things.

I think something similar would have to happen for a smiliar change to be made regarding mass-buying. If an act as major as Adele releases a new single and gets blocked by BTS because of their insistent mass-buying, the bad press from that will be much for Billboard to ignore. It may take a while but changes will be made. Especially if other artists also notice and speak on it and if Adele's label makes a complaint. Short of that, I really don't see them making any changes in regards to mass-buying.

Adele and BTS are labelmates in the US. Columbia wouldn't complain about BTS blocking Adele, they wouldn't release Adele's new single while the Army is mass buying and delivering weeks at #1 for their label.

Is it reasonable to suggest that Adele’s delay is being extended purely because of BTS?

[Rose "Payola" Nylund]

Jul 7, 2021 8:38:22 GMT -5 meg said:

Jul 7, 2021 8:28:12 GMT -5 oliviafan101 said:

Imagine spending your entire life savings on trying to get some artist or artists who don’t care that much about you to reach #1 on an arbitrary chart instead of spending it on something that’s actually fun or helpful or donating some of it to the poor.

Remember, most of the profit that comes from sales goes to the label and the executives in the label (who are probably rich as s**t) not the artist. You’re just making the rich richer and not helping the poor.

What life savings? Why do you all have this idea in your head that armys are some poor teenagers that spend their last $10 on BTS. Those who buy it are working adults who also buy ton of merch BH release basically every week. And shut up about donating to the poor when there's a legit organization created by Armys with experience who make projects around the world to help. And endless local fandoms who make donation projects like their build a school in China or donated thousands of money in hours to Palestine. They can do both and it's also their money.
BTS also are the global ambasadors of Louis Vuitton and today was a fashion show and I bet the clothes will be sold out too. Teenagers you all say? Life savings you say? And armys know BTS are getting richer and they are really happy about it.

How much do you get paid to spew stuff on here?

[Az Paynter]

More to the point, how much do we have to pay Kurt to get her to stop?

[gikem]

Jul 7, 2021 9:14:27 GMT -5 Groovy said:

I don't see anything going recurrent other than maybe Calling My Phone but I think that'll rebound after the Doja Cat/Tyler songs exiting.

Almost Maybes is right on the cusp as well thanks to its collapsing radio. I’d say its chances of going recurrent this week are 50/50. CMP is probably more likely to exit the week of 7/24.

[Choco]

Jul 7, 2021 9:22:22 GMT -5 Az Paynter said:

More to the point, how much do we have to pay Kurt to get her to stop?

Send a paypal or venmo link asap.

[meg]

Jul 7, 2021 9:18:40 GMT -5 Rose "Payola" Nylund said:

Jul 7, 2021 8:38:22 GMT -5 meg said:

How much do you get paid to spew stuff on here?

$5K for every comment. What? Are you interested in the deal too?

Also you all get mad for people screenshoting you and posting on twitter but you are screenshooting army from twitter and post here. Hypocrites much?

[Rose "Payola" Nylund]

What if this were, like, a song with Beyoncé?